Sentences with phrase «supplanting federal»

The department's initial release of regulations addressing the issue of supplanting federal funds drew a sharp rebuke from key lawmakers including Sen. Lemar Alexander, R - Tenn., chair of the Senate's education committee and a primary architect of ESSA.

(District of Columbia) With the curtain fast falling on the Obama White House, a broad coalition of school officials is taking one last stab at rolling back a proposed rule over supplanting federal education money.

But the FBI director is never empowered to supplant federal prosecutors and assume command of the Justice Department.»

And in Connecticut v. AEP, the Court held that by creating that regulatory authority, Congress intended to supplant federal tort liability for CO2 emissions.

Not exact matches

If the U.S. establishes a federal trading system in response, the scale of U.S. emissions trading could supplant the dominance of the E.U. in the budding global carbon market.

The third is the topic getting much attention of late: the administration's interpretation of the federal law's longstanding «supplement, not supplant» language.

And how should districts ensure they are truly using federal dollars to «supplement not supplant» state and local funds?

And, finally, they would need to demonstrate that districts won't simply use federal benefits to supplant planned increases in teacher pay.

The federal supplement, not supplant provision is intended to ensure that services provided under Title I are in addition to, and not in place of, services that would otherwise be provided to participating students with state and local funds if Title I, Part A funds were not allocated to the school site.

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) negotiated rulemaking committee completed its third and final session today coming to consensus on the assessment (testing) issues but failing to reach agreement on supplement, not supplant (ESSA provisions requiring that federal Title I funds be used in addition to state and local education investments and not as a substitute for such).

NOTE: Funds made available under the RLIS Program shall be used to supplement, not supplant, any other Federal, State or local education funds.

Federal law is very clear that such money is to be used to supplement education spending for the neediest students, not supplant all state funding.

AASA, the School Superintendents Association, highlighted a joint letter on the Dept. of Education's proposed «supplement, not supplant» regulations, which called them «far - reaching federal mandates» that are «in conflict with the spirit and intent of the underlying statute, which is premised on state and local...

Dear U.S. Secretary John B. King, Jr.: Write regulations for the Every Student Succeeds Act that ensure schools serving poor students get the federal funds they were intended to get and don't back down from the fight over supplement - not - supplant, nine Democratic senators — including presidential contender Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont — wrote in a letter Monday.

When federal funds are made available, they will be used to supplement the amount of state and local funds that would, in the absence of such federal funds, be made available for the uses specified in the state plan, and in no case supplant such state or local funds.

The U.S. Department of Education is seeking public comment on the proposed regulation to implement the requirement in Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, revised as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), that federal funds must supplement, and may not supplant, state and local funds.

King countered that under No Child Left Behind, the implementation of supplement, not supplant was not successful in achieving the goal of ensuring federal funding was supplemental, and disadvantaged students at continuously low - performing schools failed to receive supportive services.

The U.S. Department of Education (ED), Senate Republicans, and education leaders continue to spar over ESSA requirements related to «supplement - not - supplant,» a tricky funding issue in the law that stipulates that federal funding should not replace state and local education dollars but, instead, should add to them.

How does a great deal of the federal legislation read, «supplement, not supplant?»

The No Child Left Behind Act requires that schools use federal funding to supplement existing services — the law prohibits schools, districts and states from using federal money to supplant existing spending.

There are concerns that schools might overlook the federal supplant rules as they implement the LCFF — especially as it relates to the use of Title III money intended for English learners.

A prominent academic think tank is questioning whether three key federal compliance rules - supplement - not - supplant, comparability and maintenance of effort - pose more of a barrier to school innovation than a deterrent to scofflaw administrators.

Beginning with the original supplement - not - supplant provision in 1970, the federal government has had a responsibility to enforce this requirement of the law.

To address this inequity, Congress approved the first supplement - not - supplant provision in 1970 to ensure that districts did not use federal money to replace state and local dollars.

And we have federal (public) currency that used to compete with and has now supplanted private bank notes.

Provide additional financial resources in addition to technical assistance and other in - kind supports that will enhance access to and the quality of early childhood education programs in the state, and in so doing, ensure that additional resources do not supplant other federal, state, local or private dollars for similar purposes.