NCLB's
supplemental services provisions are significant because they offer real options to some parents who previously had none and because of the precedent it sets: true Title I portability — the first time the federal government has formally established in law that «the money follows the child.»
He bases this conclusion solely on the fact that few parents in Worcester chose to exercise their rights to switch schools or to choose a for - profit vendor for after - school tutoring - options they possess under the federal law's school choice and
supplemental services provisions.
School districts confront the challenges of rolling out No Child Left Behind's school choice and
supplemental services provisions
The public school choice and
supplemental services provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act were to be the most tangible lifelines for parents whose children attend low - performing schools.
And just one more had taken advantage of
the supplemental services provision to obtain tutoring from a provider outside of the public school system.
The Worcester district also uses its control over the flow of information to limit the influence of NCLB's
supplemental services provision.
Not exact matches
School choice and
supplemental educational
services were not high on the political priority list under the first Bush administration, but it does not follow that these two vital
provisions for parents can not be made to work.
NCLB has a fairly simple structure: states were required to develop learning standards along with consistent assessments of student accomplishment of these standards; schools were required to be on a glide path to get all of their students up to a state - defined proficiency level by 2013; and the federal government established a series of corrective actions — including
provision of
supplemental services, broad student choice, and reconstitution — that were required of individual schools after continual deviation from this glide path.
EdNext: Observers have noted that many states appear to be complying with NCLB's highly qualified teacher (HQT)
provision mostly through creative bookkeeping, and are doing no more than they must when it comes to public - school choice or
supplemental services.
Youll probably see a stepped up effort on the departments part to work with states and — when we can — with local districts to make sure the notification
provisions on teacher quality, school choice, and
supplemental services are more fully implemented.
The basics of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)-- adequate yearly progress benchmarks,
provision of
supplemental services, and a «highly qualified» teacher in every classroom — are known.
In Florida, we embraced the
Supplemental Educational
Services (SES)
provision of NCLB by communicating it as a three - way partnership where the parents, the private tutoring provider, and the school are all working together for the benefit of the student.
Case Studies of
Supplemental Services Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Findings from 2003 - 04 (2005) examines implementation of supplemental educational services provisions of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) during the 2003 - 04 school year, the second year the requirements were in effect, through case studies of nine districts in
Supplemental Services Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Findings from 2003 - 04 (2005) examines implementation of supplemental educational services provisions of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) during the 2003 - 04 school year, the second year the requirements were in effect, through case studies of nine districts in six
Services Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Findings from 2003 - 04 (2005) examines implementation of
supplemental educational services provisions of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) during the 2003 - 04 school year, the second year the requirements were in effect, through case studies of nine districts in
supplemental educational
services provisions of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) during the 2003 - 04 school year, the second year the requirements were in effect, through case studies of nine districts in six
services provisions of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) during the 2003 - 04 school year, the second year the requirements were in effect, through case studies of nine districts in six states.
Jennifer led the development of the SESQ Center's nationally recognized website (www.tutorsforkids.org) and produced widely used tools to help states, districts, providers and families understand and implement the
Supplemental Educational
Services (SES)
provision of the No Child Left Behind Act (NLCB).
Government funded programs that do not have as their principal purpose the
provision of, or payment for, the cost of health care but which do incidentally provide such
services are not health plans (for example, programs such as the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) and the Food Stamp Program, which provide or pay for nutritional
services, are not considered to be health plans).