Not exact matches
Congress in 2007 required that refiners blend 36 billion gallons of
ethanol into fuel
supply by 2022.
The rest can still be fed
into the corn
supply chain to make
ethanol or grits or any of the other products corn is already used for.
You then take that
ethanol and burn it
into an internal combustion engine that is maybe 20 - 30 % efficient, and you end up with a tremendous amount of wasted energy... And you've used up farmland that could instead have grown food for human consumption, increasing food prices by reducing
supply.
Market - based principles should guide policymakers away from top - down, government - mandated ventures such as the flawed Renewable Fuel Standard — which could force higher
ethanol blend fuels
into the national
supply, potentially damaging vehicle engines and saddling consumers with repair costs.
Last week the EPA dismissed a petition by the American Petroleum Institute seeking relief from the cellulosic
ethanol mandate, which requires that oil refiners blend 8.65 million gallons of
ethanol into the fuel
supply by the end of 2012:
NASCAR racing team owner Richard Childress has an op - ed in the Charlotte Observer this week in which he renders a full - throttle endorsement of E15 gasoline and the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), the federal program that requires more and more
ethanol be blended
into the nation's fuel
supply.
The 2005 energy bill and a 2007 revamp mandated increasing volumes of cellulosic
ethanol be blended
into the nation's gasoline and diesel
supplies each year through 2022.
They want Washington to force refiners like ExxonMobil to blend 15 percent
ethanol — or E15 —
into the motor - fuel
supply.
Because, as I wrote in 2012, under the current law, refiners (and, indirectly, consumers) have to pay a fee for failing to blend cellulosic
ethanol into existing fuel
supplies.
Almost all of these projects differ from the
ethanol being blended
into the US gasoline
supply in that they are made from inedible feedstocks, which sidesteps one of the critiques often leveled at biofuels: that they compete in with crops raised for people or livestock, driving up food prices.
Rather, the agency set
ethanol requirements higher and higher with no apparent regard for falling U.S. gasoline consumption, allowing the RFS to drive the country headlong toward the «
ethanol blend wall» — and potential harms from forcing more
ethanol into the fuel
supply than it can safely absorb.
Unfortunately, the bill is a distraction from fundamental problems with the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which is forcing more and more
ethanol into the nation's fuel
supply.
The history of the RFS is that EPA's enthusiasm for the program has seen the agency mandate ever - increasing volumes of
ethanol in the fuel
supply, potentially putting consumers at risk by pushing fuels
into the marketplace that could damage the engines of vehicles, motorcycles, boats and small power equipment.
Trees turned
into ethanol are less productive than if the biomass is used to
supply power to PHEVs,
The Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) program requires fuel
suppliers to incorporate a minimum quantity of renewable, biomass - based
ethanol or biodiesel
into gasoline
supplies.
That's what we draw from EPA's requirements for levels of corn
ethanol and other renewable fuels that must be blended
into the U.S. fuel
supply.
Under the current law, refiners (and, indirectly, consumers) have to pay a fee for failing to blend cellulosic
ethanol into existing fuel
supplies.
API Downstream Group Director Bob Greco told reporters EPA is right to use its waiver authority to set the requirements below the original congressional mandate, calling it an acknowledgment of the «market limitations of the
ethanol blend wall» — the amount of
ethanol that can be safely blended
into the fuel
supply as E10 gasoline that's standard across the country.
Turn the high fructose corn syrup
into ethanol instead of use it to pollute the food
supply with unnecessary calories.