Sentences with phrase «support arguments with»

If you want to lose, you don't need to support your arguments with authority.

For example, if you are writing a research paper on ethics of abortions, you have to support your arguments with evidence from secondary sources.

They can write better, deeper academic papers because they can support their arguments with more evidence.

He supports his argument with numerous persuasive anecdotes about individuals who have walked out of the underclass with the help of faith - based, grassroots groups that practice «hard - headed, soft - hearted» compassion.

I suppose that if supporting my arguments with what I consider to be reliable evidence is the limitation of ideas in your view, then I'm willing to accept that.

At other times, however, especially when he is speaking systematically and not illustrating or supporting his argument with concrete examples, Whitehead seems to make a stronger claim for causal efficacy.

Why doesn't she support her argument with quotes from the bible?

The doctor who posted the inkblots supported his argument with a nod to the optometric Snellen eye chart (it starts with that big letter E) which is posted on Wikipedia.

McCleary makes a case for the benefits of a high intake of healthy fats and supports his argument with clinicial research

The main article I have used is one on Kenya as I look to develop pupils knowledge of other countries and the skill of supporting arguments with evidence from articles.

While editing a research paper analyze whether your thesis statement is clear, whether you have supported your arguments with secondary resources, whether you have structured the paper logically, and whether your introduction is truly concluding.

The purpose of writing an analytical essay is to help the student learn how to support his argument with evidence from secondary resources.

You have to write about your perception of an object or situation, refer to secondary sources, develop the argument (point of view), and support this argument with evidence.

Just keep in mind that you always need to support the argument with evidence so remember to extensively research and plan your essay writing process.

Before a rage - fueled fanboy suffers an imminent stroke, thus casting a dark shadow over this post, I will try to actually start supporting my argument with a quick synopsis of a shitty, low budget movie I once saw.

Supporting your argument with the possibility that I'm either insane or dishonest suggests that you yourself have some doubts that your argument might not stand on its own merits.

In your letter, you need to convince the reader that you are the best candidate for event manager position by providing them with supporting arguments with real - life examples of your achievements.

Not exact matches

Both sides of the discussion are armed with data to support their argument.

A parade of reports and experts explained away high house prices and debt levels with many of the same arguments we hear today in Canada — yes, prices are way up compared to rents, but the analysis is built on flawed data; debt levels are high, but so are house prices, which minimizes the risk; America's demographics support the boom; and then the classic: There'll be a soft landing.

Come up with your thesis, three supporting arguments, and a concluding statement.»

Experts said the Bank of Canada's statement also raises other arguments to help support a wait - and - see approach with the interest rate.

Q. On the reference case the Supreme Court of Canada is slated to hear sometime in the spring, do you plan to file arguments with the court supporting the federal government's position?

The argument from people in support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining.

Though one of American's core arguments for the merger was that the company needed to grow to compete more aggressively with Delta and United, the chief executives of those companies came out in support of the deal and further industry consolidation.

The last childlike argument from someone with no valid position or evidencial support.

Who would ever imagine that a book written to control the masses through fear and guilt would ever predict that some would question its validity??? My 5th grader could have come up with random statements to support this circular argument.

Kaine started out with a version of the «personally opposed but publically supporting» argument based on the specious claim that the First Amendment of the Constitution prevents us from imposing our religious «values» on public life.

If your position is that objective moral values don't exist (which you've clearly stated) then support that theory with a sound argument # 4 What have you brought?

To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization from features found in human experience is not sufficient to justify the claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical argument rather than intuition or generalization is necessary to support the claim that experience is essentially temporal.

If there is no god what argument is needed to support that position if it doesn't conflict with any facts or evidence?

You ridiculed the idea that 40K was a reasonable number with no logical argument to support your view at all.

By contrast the second kind of argument mounted under the banner of process hermeneutics supports a claim that such - and - such a tenet of process theology is «Biblical theology» in the sense of being compatible with what some Biblical texts say on a theological topic.

You have yet to directly respond to the specific points I've made at least three times now, i.e.: 1) the immutable good nature argument is simply unsupported definitional fiat (god can be equally described as malevolent or apathetic with equal support); 2) the immutable good nature argument presents a source of morality beyond god's direct control placing the argument in the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) the argument suggests god is not omnipotent because god is constrained to only a limited set of potential behaviors.

And even if there are valid arguments in support of churches with a predominant ethnic group, still the wider Christian community often falters when it comes to demonstrating unity in Christ.

However, I also support my right to call them loons, or to pick apart their arguments, or generally treat their ideas with contempt (and some beliefs are deserving of contempt even if labeled religious).

I'm fine with you or anyone else believing in a god, but to claim this discovery as proof or even support of that belief is unnecessary and even detrimental to the larger argument for a god.

«One thing only do I know for certain,» he wrote in Civilization and Its Discontents, «and that is that man's judgments of value follow directly his wishes for happiness — that, accordingly, they are an attempt to support his illusions with argument.»

In essence, Petigny's argument is that these were all ephemeral developments, almost illusions, and the strongest evidence in support of his view is the rapidity with which these signs of social health evaporated...

Built right into the religion of Christianity is the insane capability for an individual to take any side of any argument and support it with some from their precious Bible.

and because what is being asked doesn't fit in with what they choose to do... they reject God and use whatever arguments are at hand to support their position.

Just because pro-choice advocates make these arguments does not mean that courts (the same courts that are ready to overrule Roe) are likely to discover abortion rights under a statute that does not even mention abortion and that was enacted with the support of pro-life groups like the National Association of Evangelicals and the Mormon Church.

It also won't do to enter the public arena ready to slash the perceived enemy with arguments that offer superior support for the sole correct worldview, namely Christianity.

Concealing the Word of God [2:76] And when they meet the believers, they say, «We believe,» but when they get together with each other, they say, «Do not inform (the believers) of the information given to you by GOD, lest you provide them with support for their argument concerning your Lord.

We concluded that there are several reasons that could be used to support an argument for choosing Jesus as our compass, for granting him a sacred role as meaning - giver: first, we are not aware of any especially good alternatives; second, his ability to serve in this role has been confirmed in many faithful lives; and third, in choosing him we align ourselves with a compass which is in the public domain, and as such our interpretation is subject to the correction of tradition and public debate.

Please go do some homework and come up with a non-circular argument supporting your claim.

It is a term historically associated with argument in support of specifically religious claims, but it is a more widely applicable intellectual virtue.

You can blow away any remaining support for the bible and argument over the details of its crazy contents (if anyone still tries to support that cr @p pile of a book) with the following anyway:

I was reading the thread here, and happened to notice as the other posters began to dismantle your arguments with their strongly supported assertions, you, as most often «believers» tend to do, began to get less and less specific, and... began to skate past their points, while bringing in more and more «fluffy» scriptural references.

Best Argument: Daniel Kirk with «Gay Marriage in New York» «As long as the state is in the marriage business, Christians should support gay marriage as an embodiment of our calling to love our neighbor as ourselves.»

In fact, trade today must be supported with arguments based on absolute advantage.