The legendary Alan Rosenblatt, Dr. Digipol himself, did come up with one idea that jumped out at me — digital graffiti screen as a public billboard, inviting people to register
their support of a given policy.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels
of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments
of the aerospace industry, levels
of air travel, financial condition
of commercial airlines, the impact
of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition
of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery,
support, performance and realization
of the anticipated benefits
of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing
of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition
of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration
of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization
of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels
of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability
of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope
of future repurchases
of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level
of other investing activities and uses
of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition
of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery
of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits
of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits
of diversification and balance
of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome
of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact
of the negotiation
of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect
of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect
of changes in U.S. trade
policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade
policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect
of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition
of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits
of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing
of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence
of events that may
give rise to a right
of one or both
of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee
of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million
of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects
of the announcement or the completion
of the merger on the market price
of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation
of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value
of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Tech stocks, thought to thrive more under Clinton
given her
support of net neutrality and other tech - friendly
policies, also sold off, including Netflix (nflx), down almost 2 %.
The
policy as it stands today provides relief to working parents by
giving them a non-refundable tax credit
of up to $ 1,000 annually, and it has had bipartisan
support since it became law in 1997.
Given the high level
of discontent expressed on the say - on pay proposal last year, when 56.6 %
of non-state shareholders voted against, securing
support for the proposed remuneration
policy may be a challenge.
The Bank
of Canada will continue to focus on what it does best:
supporting the economic and financial well - being
of Canada by achieving low, stable and predictable inflation; by keeping core financial market infrastructure safe; and by
giving sound advice on financial sector
policies so that vulnerabilities do not get in the way
of sustainable, productive growth for all Canadians.
As I argued in a recent speech, simple
policy rules, including the most popular versions
of the Taylor Rule, understate the degree
of monetary
support that may be required to achieve a
given set
of economic objectives in a post-financial crisis world.
«This program is intended to
support the other measures by additionally lowering long - term interest rates... and at the same time it
gives a signal that monetary
policy is committed to its goal
of stable prices.»
The limitations
of macroprudential
policies reflect the potential for risks to emerge outside sectors subject to regulation, the potential for supervision and regulation to miss emerging risks, the uncertain efficacy
of new macroprudential tools such as a countercyclical capital buffer, and the potential for such
policy steps to be delayed or to lack public
support.14
Given such limitations, adjustments in monetary
policy may, at times, be needed to curb risks to financial stability.15
The televangelists not only
gave whole - hearted
support to America's
policy of stockpiling nuclear weapons, but encouraged people to look forward to the expected nuclear war with joyful expectation.
10) Catholics, in seeking to form their judgment as to whether the death penalty is to be
supported as a general
policy, or in a
given situation, should be attentive to the guidance
of the pope and the bishops.
The faith
of a President is important in that it's a part
of his character and
gives us an insight into what
policies we can expect him to
support or not
support.
Many who
support this kind
of development also
give moral and political
support to the top down
policies that dominate the global economic system.
«Unsustainable Liberalism» is one
of three addresses
given to a symposium on «After Liberalism,» put on in late February with the
support of the Simon / Hertog Fund for
Policy Analysis and
of Fieldstead and Company.
This paper and the responses by Daniel J. Mahoney and Paul J. Griffiths were
given at a First Things symposium titled «After Liberalism» and were prepared and published with the
support of the Simon / Hertog Fund for
Policy Analysis and
of Fieldstead and Company.
Although it is now clearly demonstrated that the most cost - effective step for most utility companies and industries is to invest in more efficient equipment so as to reduce the use
of fuel, the energy
policy of the Bush administration,
supported by prevailing preferences among economists,
gives only lip service to this approach.
But we who are aware
of the deep interconnectedness
of all things, notice how the true wellbeing
of one part
of creation
supports that
of others, and we are led to see how
policies that reduce pressure on resources and defend the commons also
give opportunities to the poor to survive and even prosper.
«SPL is far from perfect as a
policy, but we need to
give it time to «bed down» and for employers to get to grips with their vital role in
supporting mums and dads to share it more equitably — to the benefit
of both parents» careers, and their children's wellbeing.»
Given the Trump administration's zealous quest to roll back many other food
policy advances achieved under President Obama — restaurant menu labeling, improved Nutrition Facts boxes, food safety measures and more — it's understandable why Perdue's announcement has caused a lot
of consternation among those who
support healthier school meals.
Charlotte Wright, professor
of community child health at the University
of Glasgow and one
of the members campaigning for the change in the
policy, told The BMJ that she had no objection to the college surveying its members
given that the numbers who voted at the annual general meeting were so small — 66 delegates
supported the motion and 53 were against it.
(1) to protect and promote breastfeeding, as an essential component
of their overall food and nutrition
policies and programmes on behalf
of women and children, so as to enable all infants to be exclusively breastfed during the first four to six months
of life; (2) to promote breastfeeding, with due attention to the nutritional and emotional needs
of mothers; (3) to continue monitoring breastfeeding patterns, including traditional attitudes and practices in this regard; (4) to enforce existing, or adopt new, maternity protection legislation or other suitable measures that will promote and facilitate breastfeeding among working women; (5) to draw the attention
of all who are concerned with planning and providing maternity services to the universal principles affirmed in the joint WHO / UNICEF statement (note 2) on breastfeeding and maternity services that was issued in 1989; (6) to ensure that the principles and aim
of the International Code
of Marketing
of Breastmilk Substitutes and the recommendations contained in resolution WHA39.28 are
given full expression in national health and nutritional
policy and action, in cooperation with professional associations, womens organizations, consumer and other nongovermental groups, and the food industry; (7) to ensure that families make the most appropriate choice with regard to infant feeding, and that the health system provides the necessary
support;
Given the potentials the card reader has for disinfecting the process with the scrutiny
of authentication
of the voter register, all those who stand for genuine electoral reform have no choice but to improve the enabling
policy ambiance for
supporting the card reader by ensuring judicial clarity which
supports its use.
The current incongruent decisions by the tribunals must therefore be put to rest with an unequivocal declaration by the Supreme Court, and it is the prayer
of all who want to see credible elections endure in Nigeria, that the decision
of the apex court
gives undisputed
support for the card reader, an election tool which was budgeted for, resources allocated and the allocation approved by the National Assembly, this being the universal process
of policy implementation.
The survey also showed cross-party agreement on the degree
of priority
given to LEPs but the picture is a little more complicated when it comes to the Northern Powerhouse, the series
of policies to
support economic growth in Northern cities.
However, if a more isolationist or nationalist US president emerges from the 2016 electoral process in America, and European electors
give ever higher levels
of support for nationalist - oriented parties, then we have little reason to expect partnership on foreign
policy issues, and even fewer reasons to expect multilateral responses to global problems.
Neglecting these «output» and «input» aspects
of legitimacy and
giving priority instead to a euronationalist justification
of a European sovereignty in the making could also turn out to be detrimental to individual freedoms: the illusion
of homogeneity it would produce could incite European citizens to
support policies sold by political leaders as being in the interest
of the European «community» or «people», but actually only serving a tiny minority.
Our
policies will be aimed at the least well off and will address the need to
support vulnerable families, provide proper education, tackle the epidemic
of debt, fight crime and drug abuse and
give people a decent environment to live in.
Ms Burrow also warned against the dangers
of austerity: «
Given a choice
of economic
policies, two - thirds
of people
support government action to invest in job creation to allow economies to grow and pay off debts compared with less than one in four who want debts paid off now by cutting back on government spending.»
«
Given the important role public
policies and services play in
supporting individuals to make the most
of their talents, we will consider legislating to make clear that tackling socio - economic disadvantage and narrowing gaps in outcomes for people from different backgrounds is a core function
of public services,» the white paper stated.
At the very least we should be looking to test the
support and commitment
of councillors (and MPs)
given the opportunity to
support a platform if robust left
policies.
At worst, he could
give to these
policies the impression
of cross-party
support: «It is a Labour MP pushing these measures through, you know!».
Malliotakis has criticized that plan, as well as the current
policy of placing homeless in hotels,
supporting instead supportive housing for homeless, which includes offering more vocational training to help people get jobs, and
giving those with mental illness treatment.
The
policy in brief is
giving students financial
support upfront so that they can pay for their living costs while at university rather than
giving them money to pay back a loan they can pay back over a number
of years.
Those polled were dismissive
of the reasons offered for not holding a referendum, with 52 % saying that politicians who did not
support a vote did so because they thought it would not
give them the result they wanted, while 46 %
of Labour supporters agreed — despite this being their party's
policy.
In the 2015 leadership contest I
supported Andy Burnham to be our leader because I agreed with his
policies and views on the NHS and also because I had been a workplace rep for Unite and Andy had
given us a great deal
of support.
The SLF therefore reiterates its strong
support for Coalition
policy towards the Post Office, and calls on Liberal Democrat ministers to carefully bear in mind the impact
of reforms to Royal Mail,
giving full consideration to increased worker - and public - ownership.
Lib Dem party
policy is to
support the injection
of much - needed private capital, but crucially 51 % would remain in public hands through a mix
of mutualisation and direct public ownership; the same arguments for keeping the Post Office network in public hands apply to Royal Mail too, particularly
given the pressing need to retain a universal and affordable service.
Ultimately this setup would mean that the Republicans nor Democrats could put through
policy without winning over
support of this third party, basically allowing the 3rd party to put their spin on any
given bill to suit their agenda prior to
supporting (the third party here gain tremendous influence for a tiny portion
of seats).
Yet the overall result
of this election proved that the
policies of Margaret Thatcher retained significant
support, with the Conservatives
given a third convincing majority.
That outcome was stunning
given the speaker's long identification with the LGBT community — as the 1991 campaign manager and later chief
of staff to Tom Duane, the Council's first out gay member; as head
of the New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project; as a demonstrator arrested year after year in protests against the exclusion
of openly gay participants in Manhattan's St. Patrick's Day Parade; and as a Council member who pursued a range
of initiatives in
support of the community, including a school anti-bullying law, a requirement that the city only do businesses with contractors with anti-discrimination
policies in place, and funding for LGBT homeless youth services, senior services, and the capital needs
of the LGBT Community Center.
And although we do not generally
support stuffing the budget with
policy items, it might be smart to put ethics reform there,
given the urgency for change after the recent corruption convictions
of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos.
«The Tories fended off attacks on their plans to
give married couples a tax break as political parties engaged in angry clashes over family
policy... Mr Cameron renewed his commitment to the
policy, saying he wanted to send out a message that «If you take responsibility, you'll be rewarded»... As family
policy took centre stage in pre general - election skirmishes, Mr Cameron said
supporting marriage was an important part
of his plans to tackle Britain's «broken society».
The year's most prominent science issue, federal
support of embryonic stem cell research, is so controversial that the sons
of Ronald Reagan
gave dueling speeches at the opposing party conventions; Michael Reagan backs President George W. Bush's
policies, including the ban on funding for research on new stem cell lines, while Ron
supports Senator John Kerry's promise to lift restrictions.
The team ranked the strength
of the evidence
of a
given policy's effectiveness as limited (at least one study showed an effect, which wasn't contradicted by other studies), moderate (two or more studies showed the same effect, no contradictory studies) or
supported (three or more studies with at least two independent datasets found an effect with no contradictory studies).
The award is
given annually to recognize an individual who either has worked to put in place
policies grounded in educational research or has spearheaded efforts to increase the recognition and
support of educational research.
Given the interconnectedness
of global challenges,
policy - makers must also build solid frameworks with human and financial
support to coordinate multidisciplinary research to optimize local coherence, minimize duplication, and avoid maladapted practices.
Republican -
supported health
policy proposals aim to increase the use
of HSAs, which
give people a tax - free place to put cash aside to pay for their deductibles and other health expenses.
Given our rapid responses to administration
policies that affected science and scientists, our vocal
support for positive legislative initiatives, and our coordination and engagement with an excited and interested scientific community, we believe we'll look back at 2017 as a year
of awakening for the science advocacy community.
The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and
support • Early identification of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support • Early identification
of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years •
Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint
policy statement on the early years; tickell review
of EYFS; free entitlement
of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness
of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks
Giving parent's control •
Supporting families through the system: a continuation
of early
support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer
of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information •
Giving parents more control over
support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice
of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use
of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal
Back to reformers: If these results stand — and possibly improve as more teachers hold these roles and help one another succeed — can we possibly all work together to change
policies and systems to
support giving every student access to excellent teaching, and
giving every teacher outstanding career opportunities without being forced up and out
of the classroom?