Massachusetts 2020 and the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, along with education, civil rights and child advocacy leaders, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in
support of the plaintiffs in the Hancock vs. Driscoll school financing case.
On November 23, 2015, the Nevada State Education Association and National Education Association filed an Amicus Curiae Brief In
Support of Plaintiffs» Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
Amicus Curiae Brief of Public Law Center, NCLC, Public Counsel in
Support of Plaintiffs» Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Case Challenging Dep» t of Education's Abandonment of Full Loan Relief for Defrauded Corinthian Students (Manriquez v. DeVos, April 16, 2018)
Despite significant medical testimony in
support of plaintiff's case and in spite of enormous emotional impact of the death of a young woman who left a widower and a young son, Kevin obtained a defendant's verdict and then was able to protect the verdict at the Appellate and Supreme Court level.
What is interesting about this case is that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed an amicus brief in
support of Plaintiff's claims.
[Note 6] We acknowledge the amicus brief submitted in
support of the plaintiff by the Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys, as well as the amicus brief submitted in support of the defendant by the Massachusetts Defense Lawyers Association.
The following applications for permission to file an amicus / amici curiae brief in
support of plaintiffs / respondents / cross-appellants Andrea Savaglio et al. are granted: (1) Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California et al., (2) La Raza Centro Legal and Equal Rights Advocates, (3), California Employment Lawyers Association, and (4) Alameda County Central Labor Council et al..
[108] The evidence in
support of the plaintiff's claim for loss of housekeeping capacity was not extensive.
Relying on the fair use doctrine, we are posting substantive filings in White v. West here: 02/22/2012 - Class Action Complaint 04/06/2012 - Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by Reed Elsevier) 04/06/2012 - Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by West Publishing) 04/26/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants» Motions to Dismiss (filed by White and Elan) 05/07/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by West Publishing) 05/07/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by Reed Elsevier) 05/17/2012 - Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 5/16/2012) 05/22/2012 - Transcript of Proceedings held on 5/16/2012 05/30/2012 - Answer to Complaint (filed by West Publishing) 05/30/2012 - Answer to Complaint (filed by Reed Elsevier) 06/26/2012 - Amended Complaint (filed by White) 07/10/2012 - Answer to Amended Complaint (filed by West Publishing) 07/13/2012 - Answer to Amended Complaint (filed by Reed Elsevier) 10/05/2012 - Memorandum in Suppport of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by White) 10/05/2012 - Memorandum in Suppport of Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by Reed Elsevier) 10/23/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by West Publishing) 10/23/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants» Summary Judgment Motions (filed by White) 10/23/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by Reed Elsevier) 11/02/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by West Publishing) 11/02/2012 - Reply Memorandum in
Support of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by White) 11/02/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (filed by Reed Elsevier) 11/30/2012 - Transcript of Proceedings Held on 11/20/2012 02/11/2013 - Order Granting Defendants» Motions for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 2/8/2013)
Wilson v West Hartlepool Railway Co came into the picture because looking at Snell's Equity during the argument, I found the case cited there on what seemed to be the relevant point, and I drew counsel for the plaintiffs» attention to it; and at the conclusion of leading counsel for the plaintiffs» argument his junior read me certain passages from the case in
support of the plaintiffs» cause.
Geoffrey Hoffman was among a group of legal scholars who submitted an amici curiae brief in
support of the plaintiff - appellee in the case of City of Chicago v. Sessions.
Not exact matches
A careful reading
of the documents in the lawsuit reveals that the company's human resources department plays a consistent
supporting role in the accounts
of the
plaintiffs — that
of a seemingly disinterested observer.
The
plaintiffs» motion states that in June 14 and 15 conference calls, counsel for the three sets
of plaintiffs stated that they
supported coordination or consolidation, «subject to the parties» agreement that these three cases will retain their separate identities, allowing each set
of plaintiffs to file separate briefs, make separate oral arguments, and independently make other litigation decisions.»
But the lawyer for the
plaintiffs,
supported by Americans United for Separation
of Church and State, said unlike legislatures, Greece had no official policy on prayers.
As you may have seen, last week, Reformed leaders Mark Dever, Ligon Duncan, Al Mohler, Don Carson, Kevin DeYoung, and Justin Taylor reaffirmed their
support of C.J. Mahaney, president
of Sovereign Grace Ministries, after a judge ruled that that nine
of the eleven
plaintiffs in the massive sexual abuse lawsuit against him and his ministry did not sue in time before the statue
of limitations had expired.
«
Plaintiffs have put forward no evidence
supporting the proposition that engaging in memorabilia fraud is the kind
of task that any Giants employee was ever employed or otherwise authorized to perform,» the Giants» lawyers argue, per ESPN.
The burden
of proof is on the
plaintiff and I see nothing that counts as real evidence to
support the story they are telling.
At the time
plaintiff filed the motion for default judgment in default
of defence, the defendants had not been served with any Statement
of Claim as required under the Rules
of Court in
support of the amended Writ
of Summons to which they could respond by way
of a statement
of defence.
A
supporting affidavit deposed to by a lawyer, Otika Stephen, in the law firm
of the
plaintiff's lead counsel, described Dawodu as a US - based Nigerian.
As the Rokita court noted, voters who lack Photo ID undoubtedly exist somewhere, but the fact that
Plaintiffs, in spite
of their efforts, have failed to uncover anyone «who can attest to the fact that he / she will be prevented from voting» provides significant
support for a conclusion that the Photo ID requirement does not unduly burden the right to vote.
The U.S. District Court had put them both on the ballot on February 3, on the basis that the ballot access law for newly - qualifying parties is unconstitutional and that these two
plaintiff political parties had shown they have a modicum
of support.
Here is the brief
of the
plaintiffs, in
support of the motion for an injunction.
Judge Story wrote «it appears beyond doubt that the
plaintiff can prove no set
of facts in
support of the claim», and his authority for that was that the Georgia ballot access laws held been upheld already in Jenness v Fortson, Cartwright v Barnes, and Coffield Kemp.
Plaintiffs John Cocuzza, Jacquelin Millien, Greg Esposito, Stefan Tchor, Larry Lans and Melissa Seminara, Rockland County Corrections Officers and members
of the Correction Officers Benevolent Association
of Rockland County, or «COBARC» allege that after he was re-elected in 2015, Falco retaliated against them by filing disciplinary charges against them for publicly
supporting his opponent, Richard Vazquez.
The 80 minutes
of occasionally spirited argument at the high court this morning focused on the two main issues in the greenhouse gas litigation: For the case to go forward, the
plaintiffs must prove that the case has legal standing (they must show that the court is the right venue for resolving this dispute), and that the common law definition
of nuisance can
support suits over greenhouse gases.
«It was an error on the part
of the patent office to grant the patents,» says Marcy Darnovsky
of the Center for Genetics and Society in Oakland, Calif., which has voiced their
support for the
plaintiffs in the case.
In Friedrichs, the
plaintiffs — teachers who disagreed with the politics
of their union — argued that the act
of collective bargaining is inherently political, and thus by being forced to
support an organization they do not agree with, their free speech is being violated.
Over the past two years, the highest courts
of New York, Texas, and Massachusetts have decided to end or limit their
support for adequacy
plaintiffs.
A ruling in favor
of the Friedrichs
plaintiffs — or
plaintiffs in future cases like it — would mean less money to
support members in all states, even those that are not directly affected by the ruling.
The Martinez v. Malloy
Plaintiffs are
supported by Students Matter, the organizational sponsor
of the landmark Vergara v. California lawsuit.
I want to thank our partners in advocacy for their
support of this event: The Northeast Charter School Network who have been the chief advocates for the
plaintiffs in Western New York and,
of course, the NYC Charter School Center, who have been unwavering supporters
of every charter school in this city.
Partnership for Educational Justice is grateful to have the
support and counsel
of law firms Arnold & Porter and Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry LLP, which have assembled a top - notch team
of attorneys who are donating their services to the parent -
plaintiffs on a pro bono basis.
ENN was instrumental in
supporting plaintiff - parents
of public schools students who, in Lopez v. Schwartz, viewed the voucher program as undermining and shortchanging public schools.
The changes, however, prompted Students Matter, the organization
supporting the student
plaintiffs in the Vergara trial, to withdraw its
support for the bill, calling it «a mere shell
of its former self.»
Josh Lipshutz, a
plaintiffs» lawyer, attempted to undercut her, by referring to an interview she gave to a local newspaper in which she stated «Teachers have expressed a lot
of frustration with the lack
of support they received from the district administration.»
Last month, my organization, Students Matter, issued its
support of California's AB 934 — a state bill that, though imperfect, honestly attempted to address the grave defaults in the state's teacher tenure, dismissal and layoff laws challenged by the student
plaintiffs in Vergara v. California.
With the
support of two advocacy groups, 25
plaintiffs across the state filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging a private school voucher law passed earlier this year.
«I would stand in
support of being a
plaintiff on this case.»
Before the school board voted on the issue, MCSD Superintendent Joe Petrone said he stood behind the lawsuit and
supported the concept
of Moffat County as a
plaintiff.
Despite having promised their
support for the lawsuit, they are now not only trying to get the case dismissed, but are asking the court to prevent the Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding [CCJEF], a broad coalition
of towns, schools, parents and public school advocates, from even serving as the
plaintiffs in the case.
Once upon a time, when Governor Dannel Malloy was Mayor Dan Malloy
of Stamford, he not only
supported the CCJEF v. Rell lawsuit but was an original
plaintiff in the historic battle to force the State
of Connecticut to fulfill its constitutional obligation to the children
of Connecticut.
Brown v. New York parent
plaintiffs continue to fight for their day in court; supporters rally with them in
support of fair funding Rochester court heard arguments about why the charter funding case should not be dismissed, as the state continues to try to have it thrown out; parents and supporters rallied before hearing
Leading up to oral arguments for Friedrichs v. California E4E conducted a survey
of over 1,000 members — current classroom teachers from across the country — and found that a majority
of teachers
support paying fair - share fees and were opposed to the
plaintiffs» position in this case.
I'll be talking more about what those depositions revealed over the next few weeks, but if you would like to read the (lengthy) documents yourself, the
Plaintiff's Memorandum
of Law in
Support of their Motion for Class Certification is here (PDF) and the deposition excerpts are here (PDF).
In a January complaint, the
plaintiffs had implied that the bookseller may have
supported the conspiracy because it wanted to protect the price
of its hardcover books.
The
plaintiff's attorney cites a number
of different legal cases to
support the finding that Smith should be held personally liable for his negligence: «It is well settled that an individual member
of a limited liability company or an office
of a corporation may be individual liable for his or her own torts, including negligence.»
The
plaintiff argues the briefs filed in
support of the University
of Pennsylvania provide the university an argument word - count advantage and seek to inject irrelevant issues that are not before the court.
In both local lawsuits, the
plaintiffs have pointed out that when the laws were passed last year, they didn't have the
support of three large veterinary associations — the America Veterinary Medical Association, Chicago Veterinary Medical Association, and Illinois State Veterinary Medical Association.
But the EPA's Endangerment Finding and
supporting Technical
Support Document (TSD) have been attacked by a large number
of plaintiffs.
But contrary to the Journal's claim that the EPA disavowed that finding because the agency had been «barraged by
plaintiff attorneys and Hollywood celebrities,» it was actually changed after the EPA's scientific advisory board, which evaluates the agency's «use
of science,» pointed out that the draft conclusion wasn't
supported elsewhere in the report: