Two regulations that could turn me to
support oil sands development would be that 1) all development is done in - situ and 2) that all extraction energy is derived from renewable energy such as wind power or hydropower.
Not exact matches
In fact, U.S. employment
supported by
oil sands development could grow to a peak of 600,000 jobs in 2035, according to one scenario in a new report from the Canadian Energy Research Institute.
Indeed, our analysis
supports recent comments in the EPA's review of the State Department's final impact statement that, with
oil prices in a sustained range of $ 65 - $ 75, «construction of the pipeline is projected to change the economics of
oil sands development and result in increased
oil sands production, and the accompanying greenhouse gas emissions, over what would otherwise occur» [2].
•
Oil sands development associated with the Keystone XL could
support 117,000 new U.S. jobs by 2035, according to the Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI).
In fact, one study has estimated that greater
oil sands development as a whole could
support 600,000 U.S. jobs in 2035.
She reports there are about 960 American companies that
support Alberta
oil sands activities, with thousands more jobs that could be created if the U.S. would take steps to promote greater
oil sands development — such as approving the Keystone XL pipeline.
As has become the norm, their objections were
supported by over-estimates of the greenhouse gas implications of
oil sands development.