Not exact matches
To be sure, this
oppressive regime does not obtain in all seminaries, but the evidence suggests that it is widespread, and was even more common ten and twenty years ago, thus lending
support to the claim that the crisis in priestly vocations is, in large part, «artificial and contrived.»
The church often
supports oppressive political and military
regimes, thus turning Christ's suffering into a destructive reality, a civil religion supportive only of the rich and powerful.
Initially, RCDA had
support from some of the oldline churches, but that dried up when leaders decided that embarrassing news about Communist behavior got in the way of a «peace and justice» agenda that required cordial relations with the
oppressive regimes of the East.
If Schulweis were correct, Whitehead's theodicy would indeed lend itself «too easily» to the
support of
oppressive regimes.
What's so controversial about disliking
oppressive regimes and
supporting individual rights?