Sentences with phrase «support order from the court»

Post-divorce, parents are legally required to comply with support orders from a court or as per a written agreement.

When child support payments are owed, the custodial parent can seek a child support order from the court.

Once you have a support order from a court, you or child support authorities in your country can contact authorities responsible for enforcing international support orders in the province or territory where the other parent lives.

Not exact matches

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

Federal appeals court judges weighed whether they should consider Trump's previous statements supporting a complete ban on Muslims entering the country when ruling on his revised order to suspend travel from six Muslim - majority countries.

Through the petition, Ajie made what she described as a clarion call on President Obama and other concerned stakeholders to «respectfully call President Buhari to order, prohibit violence from politics and rights advocacy campaigns, ask President Buhari to respect court orders or resign, support Nigeria and Nigerians to achieve true federalism or support the path to a confederation of independent states in Nigeria.»

The sweeping anti-busing legislation — approved by the Senate as part of a bill providing funds for the Justice Department this year — not only forbids the Justice Department from bringing desegregation suits that could result in busing and limits the power of federal courts to order busing for such purposes, but allows Justice Department officials to support the removal of court - ordered busing plans already in operation.

An educator certificate suspended pursuant to paragraph (1)(i) may be reinstated only upon notice from the court or the Department of Revenue that the party has complied with the terms of the support order, subpoena, order to show cause, or written agreement.

However, under Canadian law, certain debts remain even in Bankruptcy: student loans less than seven years old, spousal or child support, alimony, debt arising from fraud, restitution orders and any court imposed fines.

Any child support court order that was written or modified after the 31st of December 1993 will automatically be deducted from your wages if you are employed.

For arrears of maintenance payments ordered by a court, Child Support Agency arrears, Child Maintenance Service arrears and debts resulting from personal injury claims, the court has the power to order that you do not have to pay all or part of these.

Most types of debt except: student loans, magistrates» court fines, maintenance payments or maintenance arrears ordered by a court, Child Support Agency or Child Maintenance Service arrears, money owed under a criminal confiscation order, debts resulting from certain personal injury claims and budgeting or crisis loans.

These exceptions could be broadly categorized as (1) debts owed to the government or subject to a court order, such as certain tax debts or child support obligations; and (2) debts incurred through some fault of the debtor, such as those arising from civil judgments for fraud or other injury.

Thus the court has been prepared to make an interim order to suspend the decision to withdraw benefits from asylum seekers and often grants permission to restrain an allegedly unlawful eviction or a failure to provide social services support.

When the court orders a child support payment different from the presumptive amount determined pursuant to the child support guidelines.

It was also noteworthy that the court - ordered support amount was based on the court imputing the father with a rental income of $ 16,800 per year from his home; the court had been forced to guess at the father's income because he had not been forthcoming with the requisite financial disclosure.

For example, if you have been requesting child support or even disclosure of income from your ex to determine child support for 5 years without cooperation, then a court may very well order retroactive child support for 5 years.

The written separation agreement was properly made a part of the final decree by virtue of Virginia Code Section 20 - 109.1, and was enforceable as any court order, even though spousal support is different from other monetary obligations.

If you are trying to separate from your spouse and to deal with corollary issues of support, property division, and child custody and access, but your spouse is withholding their consent to religious divorce in order to influence the separation process, you can apply to the courts to intervene.

Japanese law enforcement and social service agencies unfortunately seem unable to enforce custody and support orders - even those laid down by their own courts, let alone from another country's courts.

In some cases a court will allow a deviation from the child support guidelines, or will order a child support maintenance supplement in addition to the G.I. child support obligation.

Support for live - blogging courtroom proceedings and discrediting class distinctions drawn in this regard also stems from a promotion of the model of discursive democracy outlined above in Part I. Drawing on the work of theorists including Lon Fuller, recall that the Supreme Court of Canada and legal scholars such as Jeremy Waldron held that the fair functioning of the liberal democratic order required civilian access to information and the attendant opportunity to deliberate upon that information critically.

Although you could still get divorced because of your spouse's adultery or cruelty, misconduct was removed as a consideration in making orders for child support, and the court was expressly forbidden from considering the conduct of a spouse during the marriage when making orders for spousal support and the custody of children.

Section 281 (5) provides as follows: «Discharge does not, except to such extent and on such conditions as the court may direct, release the bankrupt from any bankruptcy debt which --(a) consists in a liability to pay damages [of specific types]... in respect of personal injuries to any person; or (b) arises under any order made in family proceedings or under a maintenance calculation made under the Child Support Act 1991.»

The ABA letter supports enactment of state laws that would allow courts to issue gun violence restraining orders that temporarily remove guns from people who are dangerous to themselves or others.

For this reason, Canadian law empowers a court to make one or more temporary or «interim» orders for support, which are intended to address the support recipients» needs on a shorter - term basis, pending the full resolution of the issues that arise from the dissolution of the couple's relationship.

The court does have some discretion to deviate from the orders, but a judge will stick close to the calculations unless a persuasive argument can be made by a skilled Minnesota child support lawyer.

If you are taking care of your child all or a majority of the time based on an agreement with the other parent or a court order, then you have the right to ask for child support from the other parent.

Keep in mind that, unless equalization and support issues have been resolved by way of a signed Separation Agreement or court order, your spouse may still be able to make a claim for equalization from your estate, or make a claim for dependant's relief, which is akin to spousal support.

The Court also reviewed the basic principles underlying the Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, legislation allowing BC courts to handle child and spousal support orders from other jurisdiSupport Orders Act, legislation allowing BC courts to handle child and spousal support orders from other jurisdicOrders Act, legislation allowing BC courts to handle child and spousal support orders from other jurisdisupport orders from other jurisdicorders from other jurisdictions.

When the parents don't live together, the custodial parent (the parent who has custody) can obtain court - ordered child support from the noncustodial parent (the parent who does not have custody or who has less custodial time with the children).

In the case of child support, matters are also heard in the Court of Queen's Bench, unless you are bringing an application for the reciprocal enforcement of a child support order from another province, in which case you will be heard in the Provincial Court, and so on.

When you are not receiving court - ordered child support payments, you can seek assistance from the CSSD enforcement section.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repCourt of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repcourt against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

While the applicants in this case hadn't yet been subjected to such a fear, the Court found no support in these provisions for the requirement that one should abstain from a religious practice in order to avoid such a fear.

For instance, for spousal support, para. 62 of the Alberta Family Law Act states that the court can make an order that differs from an agreement on spousal support if the court thinks that the terms are very unfair and the person who wants the agreement changed signed it without receiving independent legal advice.

When a support payor is self - employed, a court may determine that certain deductions from the payor's income or business be added back into the payor's declared income in order determine his / her income for child support purposes.

In some cases the court will order a child support payment that is different from the number in the guidelines.

After pointing out that the husband would have an easier time satisfying his hefty support arrears without a bankruptcy trustee in the way — and after taking pains to clarify that such a discharge would have no effect on the wife's support entitlement (since by law a discharge does not release a person from child / spousal support or maintenance obligation arising under a court order), the court ordered him to pay $ 25,000 to the trustee immediately.

You can request an order from the court for temporary child support, alimony, visitation rights or custody if your spouse isn't cooperating and you need assistance before your final hearing.

A 1999 Supreme Court case on this issue stated that there is a strong presumption in favour of using the Table amount for all income over $ 150,000, and that the support payor will have to show that the Table amount would be unsuitable in order for the court to deviate froCourt case on this issue stated that there is a strong presumption in favour of using the Table amount for all income over $ 150,000, and that the support payor will have to show that the Table amount would be unsuitable in order for the court to deviate frocourt to deviate from it.

Overall, the Court of Appeal found that the UK must pay Zambrano carers such amount as will enable them to support themselves in order to be the carer for the EU citizen child within the EU but, subject to that, may determine to pay social assistance to them on some different basis from the basis applied to EU nationals themselves.

The deceased in the appeal court case separated from his wife in 2012 and took out a court - ordered life insurance policy that named his ex-wife as beneficiary in order to secure his future child and spousal support obligations.

When a support payor is self - employed, a court may determine that certain personal deductions from the payor's income or business be added back into the payor's declared income, and grossed up for tax, in order determine his / her income for child support purposes.

The reason why the courts order spousal support is to «to relieve economic hardship that results from marriage or its breakdown».

To protect children from being entirely abandoned by their noncustodial parent, the court may choose to issue a child support order to ensure that the child is still supported by both parents.

This deduction is intended only for spousal maintenance, not for periodic payments from a property settlement although the court may consider periodic payments when determining whether or not to deviate from the guideline amount when ordering support.

The Act lists a variety of proceedings in respect of which there is no limitation period (section 16): proceedings for declarations; proceedings to enforce court orders and other orders that are enforceable in the same way as court orders; proceedings under the Family Law Act relating to support; proceedings to enforce arbitration awards; proceedings by persons in possession of collateral to redeem or realize on it; proceedings arising from sexual assault in certain circumstances; proceedings to recover fines, taxes and penalties owing to the Crown; proceedings relating to claims by the Crown (or by a delivery agent under social welfare legislation) in various circumstances; proceedings to recover money owing in respect of certain student loans, awards and grants.

In 2014, Chevron obtained court - ordered discovery from H5 for the company's role in supporting and advancing the lawsuit led by Steven Donziger, which a federal judge found to be tainted by fraud.

However, the court has leeway to deviate from those caps in high - net - worth scenarios in order to provide child and spousal support which will allow the «non-moneyed» custodial parent to afford themselves and the children a lifestyle commensurate with the marital lifestyle if possible.