Sentences with phrase «support plaintiffs and defendants»

The Small Claims Wizard supports plaintiffs and defendants who wish to be self - represented and at the same time want legal guidance in commencing, defending, litigating, enforcing and settling a claim.

Not exact matches

e) Even if the defendant's negligence created causal uncertainty and the plaintiff has adduced some evidence in support of its theory of causation, the trial judge is not obliged to draw an inference of causation against the defendant: Benhaim at para. 42.

Despite significant medical testimony in support of plaintiff's case and in spite of enormous emotional impact of the death of a young woman who left a widower and a young son, Kevin obtained a defendant's verdict and then was able to protect the verdict at the Appellate and Supreme Court level.

With the support of fellow BROKE members Dutton filed his mid-December application for a summary judgment to include dismissal of Kinder Morgan's damage claims and an «Order for special costs payable by the Plaintiff to the Defendant.»

«Nothing in this order shall prevent the plaintiff and defendant from being fully discharged from the debts allocated in this order in a bankruptcy proceeding except for any orders expressly for spousal support ann the following debts.»

[40] I agree with the plaintiffs that the case law supports the proposition that, notwithstanding there was no written agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants, the defendants breached their duties of loyalty, good faith and avoidance of conflict of interests and self - interest while working in the plaintiff's employ... [more]

Link transcript passages to supporting documents to see all pertinent information in one place, and categorize them as plaintiff or defendant to tie all the pieces of your case together.

The Court of Appeal set aside the dismissal where the plaintiff continued to move the action along, participated in examinations for discovery before and after the action was dismissed, and actions taken by the defendants» counsel did not support actual prejudice or reliance on finality.

Florida laws support plaintiffs» rights to recover from negligent defendants, and the experienced South Florida wrongful death attorneys at Friedman, Rodman & Frank have the knowledge and skill to seek the compensation that you deserve.

After more than two years of protracted and contentious litigation, Justice David Schmidt granted the defendants» motion for summary judgment finding that the plaintiff was unable to support her allegations with any evidence.

[59] The defendants rely on Mak v. Eichel, 2008 BCSC 1102, and Vasilyev v. Fetigan, 2007 BCSC 1759, in support of their position on the issue of gaps in the plaintiff's reporting to her physician and the inference to be drawn.

Relying on the fair use doctrine, we are posting substantive filings in White v. West here: 02/22/2012 - Class Action Complaint 04/06/2012 - Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by Reed Elsevier) 04/06/2012 - Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by West Publishing) 04/26/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants» Motions to Dismiss (filed by White and Elan) 05/07/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by West Publishing) 05/07/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (filed by Reed Elsevier) 05/17/2012 - Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 5/16/2012) 05/22/2012 - Transcript of Proceedings held on 5/16/2012 05/30/2012 - Answer to Complaint (filed by West Publishing) 05/30/2012 - Answer to Complaint (filed by Reed Elsevier) 06/26/2012 - Amended Complaint (filed by White) 07/10/2012 - Answer to Amended Complaint (filed by West Publishing) 07/13/2012 - Answer to Amended Complaint (filed by Reed Elsevier) 10/05/2012 - Memorandum in Suppport of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by White) 10/05/2012 - Memorandum in Suppport of Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by Reed Elsevier) 10/23/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by West Publishing) 10/23/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants» Summary Judgment Motions (filed by White) 10/23/2012 - Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by Reed Elsevier) 11/02/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by West Publishing) 11/02/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (filed by White) 11/02/2012 - Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (filed by Reed Elsevier) 11/30/2012 - Transcript of Proceedings Held on 11/20/2012 02/11/2013 - Order Granting Defendants» Motions for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 2/8/2013)

The plaintiff felt trapped in her position at the corporate defendant, as she was financially dependent on the job to support her daughter and herself.

The Court noted that «some of the plaintiff's initial negotiating positions were clearly inflated» but ultimately it was reasonable for the Plaintiff to refuse the Defendant's offer and proceed to trial in the face of medical evidence supporting her alleged claim of chronic pain and related diplaintiff's initial negotiating positions were clearly inflated» but ultimately it was reasonable for the Plaintiff to refuse the Defendant's offer and proceed to trial in the face of medical evidence supporting her alleged claim of chronic pain and related diPlaintiff to refuse the Defendant's offer and proceed to trial in the face of medical evidence supporting her alleged claim of chronic pain and related disability.

Furthermore, the defendants had an opportunity on the mediation to canvas fully with the plaintiff's legal advisers the extent of the plaintiff's claim and the evidence at trial which would be advanced to support the claim.

Specifically, the Judge stated that the jury would be instructed about the data loss and that the lost data affirmatively would have provided information relevant to the claims and defenses; defendant would be precluded from offering certain evidence in support of its defense; plaintiff would be able to re-depose, at defendant's cost, defendant's key witnesses about belatedly produced «substitute» data; and defendant would be responsible for 75 % of the Special Master's fees and costs and 50 % of plaintiff's attorneys» fees incurred during the Special Master proceedings.

[40] I agree with the plaintiffs that the case law supports the proposition that, notwithstanding there was no written agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants, the defendants breached their duties of loyalty, good faith and avoidance of conflict of interests and self - interest while working in the plaintiff's employ.

If a defendant has pleaded that a clam is statute barred and the plaintiff intends to try to get around the limitation period by relying on discoverability, the plaintiff needs to plead the facts that support the discoverability argument in a Reply or otherwise (Collins v. Cortez, 2014 ONCA 685).

Judge Koh wrote in her decision that the court «is not convinced that Marsh can be extended to support Plaintiff's contention that Defendants should be treated as state actors subject to First Amendment scrutiny merely because they hold out and operate their private property as a forum for expression of diverse points of view.»

The plaintiff must give the defendant copies of the divorce papers, including one copy of the Complaint, one copy of the Summons and Preliminary Injunction, one copy of the Child Support Affidavit, two copies of the Acknowledgment of Receipt of Summons and Complaint (after completion of the caption), and a stamped, self - addressed envelope.

In Weiler v. Household Finance Corp., the district court held that (1) the plaintiff was not disabled under the ADA; (2) the defendant reasonably accommodated the plaintiff; and (3) the ADA does not support claims of supervisor liability.

Due to the complexity of such disputes, our tax practice offers litigation support and expert testimony for both plaintiff and defendant positions with regard to tax abatement proceedings.