Managing Regional Director, Northern and Central California 916-250-2884
[email protected] Jeff works with school leaders, elected officials, and community members to
support quality school choice for families from Redding to Ventura by overseeing collective action and advocacy strategies to address funding, authorization, facilities and other critical issues facing schools.
Since its inception 20 years ago, CSDC's mission has been to
support quality school choice for underserved students by developing and financing affordable charter school facilities.
Not exact matches
«We're going to do everything we can to
support the governor in advancing a bold education reform agenda that improves the
quality of traditional public
schools and expands
choice for families,» the group's executive director, Jenny Sedlis, said in an interview.
In addition to losing
quality if key
choice backers were to
support charters to the exclusion of private
school choice, there are obvious political advantages to backing both types of
choice.
In polls, parents and community members generally
support reforms like
school choice, charter
schools, and improved teacher
quality.
Attitudes:
support for diversity (racial integration), a perception of inequity (that the public
schools provide a lower
quality education for low - income and minority kids),
support for voluntary prayer in the
schools,
support for greater parent influence, desire for smaller
schools, belief in what I call the «public
school ideology» (which measures a normative attachment to public
schooling and its ideals), a belief in markets (that
choice and competition are likely to make
schools more effective), and a concern that moral values are poorly taught in the public
schools.
Well - functioning
school choice requires a federal role in gathering and disseminating high -
quality data on
school performance; ensures that civil rights laws are enforced; distributes funds based on enrollment of high - need students in particular
schools; and
supports a growing supply of
school options through an expanded, equitably funded charter sector and through the unfettered growth of digital learning via application of the U.S. Constitution's commerce clause.
We see only slight changes in people's views on the
quality of the nation's
schools, for instance, or on federally mandated testing, charter
schools, tax credits to
support private
school choice, merit pay for teachers, or the effects of teachers unions.
Schneider and his colleagues believe that consumer
choice in
schooling can have positive effects on education
quality, and they
support their belief with test score data from New York City.
The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and
support • Early identification of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support • Early identification of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years •
Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high
quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control •
Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early
support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of
support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support; slim down requirements on
schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over
support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the T
support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear
choice of
school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded
school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal
They should continue to
support funding for the replication and expansion of high -
quality charter
schools, and they should make new investments in research and
support for parent information, equitable funding and facilities, and innovative, low - regulation approaches to equity and effectiveness in
schools of
choice.
Recent and ongoing projects include a researcher - practitioner partnership focused on familial and
school - based relationships that
support adolescents» emerging sense of purpose, academic engagement, achievement and post-secondary
school transitions; Project Alliance / Projecto Alianzo, a multiethnic study of parental involvement in education during adolescence; and collaboration with a local
school district focused on
school choice policies to examine equity and access to high
quality schools, along with demographic variations in parental priorities and experiences with these policies.
Ravitch also falsely claims that there is «no new evidence to
support»
school choice despite a large and growing body of high -
quality research that says otherwise.
But parents were gravely concerned with issues of
school quality, and they wanted economic integration efforts that
supported their
choice of a high -
quality school.
LFC
supports a wide range of educational
choice initiatives, so that high
quality public, charter and private
schools flourish and parents will have the opportunity to select the
quality school that works best for their children, and so that teachers will have the flexibility to select the
school that best utilizes their strengths and interests.
And just this month Nashville Rise parents made another splash onto the scene by using their most powerful weapon in
support of
quality choices by speaking against the
school board's proposed resolution to stop charter growth.
Said President and CEO Al Dubin, «This grant will allow CSDC to
support more charter
school founders dedicated to improving the educational outcomes of the children in their communities by providing
quality educational
choice in a responsive, fiscally sustainable way.»
«We're encouraged that independent observers of public education share our
support for legislative and
school board candidates across California who
support parental
choice and who are working to provide high
quality education to all children,» said Gary Borden, Executive Director of CCSA Advocates.
The mission of the Office of K - 12
School Choice is to support quality public and private educational choice programs by providing information and assistance to promote successful outcomes for students, families, institutions and commun
Choice is to
support quality public and private educational
choice programs by providing information and assistance to promote successful outcomes for students, families, institutions and commun
choice programs by providing information and assistance to promote successful outcomes for students, families, institutions and communities.
In a national survey of public
schools, the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher
Quality and Public Agenda (2007) found that if given a
choice between two otherwise identical
schools, 76 percent of secondary teachers and 81 percent of elementary teachers early in their careers would rather be at a
school in which administrators strongly
supported teachers than at a
school that paid significantly higher salaries.
It is critical for us that LAUSD board members
support parent
choice, the growth of high -
quality charter
schools in Los Angeles and funding and facilities equity for all students,» said Corri Ravare, managing regional director, Los Angeles for the California Charter Schools Association
schools in Los Angeles and funding and facilities equity for all students,» said Corri Ravare, managing regional director, Los Angeles for the California Charter
Schools Association
Schools Association (CCSA).
This means being thoughtful and forceful, willing to challenge one's own assumptions and strongly poke holes in myths, and even using media smartly in advancing
support for
school choice, teacher
quality reforms and Parent Power.
It is our hope that we can collaborate with the incoming Secretary of Education to enact policies that
support increased access to high -
quality public magnet
schools that promote
choice, equity, diversity, and academic excellence for all students.»
Quality and accountability matter, particularly when one considers the Wild West version of
school choice that DeVos
supported in Michigan to detrimental ends — 80 percent of charters are below the state average in reading and math.
Rather than bowing to special interests that seek to roll back or limit access to educational
choice, Arizona policymakers should
support policies that create more
quality public
school options.
I commend our Nation's students, parents, teachers, and
school leaders for their commitment to
quality, effective education, and I call on States and communities to
support effective education and
school choice for every child in America.
We remain committed to ensuring every child has access to a
quality school of their parents»
choice and will continue to stand alongside elected officials, Democratic or Republican, who
support and protect our
school choice programs.»
The brief lays foundational
support for
school choice as a viable, effective means for children to receive a
quality education and confirms the confusion and harm caused by Blaine amendments in state constitutions.
STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT FOR HIGH
QUALITY: * Pre - Kindergarten — College Graduation Systems * Real Parent Power through
School Governance Councils *
School Choice Options * Early Child Education & Afterschool Programs * English Language Learners (ELL)
Supports * Children w. Special Needs &
School Based Health Care Services * Effective Teacher / Principal Preparation & Evaluation Systems * High
School Drop Out Prevention
Supports * Children in Foster / Adoptive Care & Alternative Education Services
* Title I — $ 1 billion increase * New private
school choice program — $ 250 million (increase since it's new) * Charter
schools — $ 168 million increase * Title II A,
Supporting Effective Instruction Program — $ 2.4 billion cut * 21st Century Community Learning Centers — $ 1.17 billion cut * Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program — $ 190 million cut * Impact Aid Payments for Federal Property — $ 66.8 million cut * Teacher
Quality Partnership — $ 43.1 million cut
The Mission of the Idaho Charter
School Network is to improve student achievement and expand
choice among high
quality public
schools by advancing and
supporting Idaho's charter
schools.
Around 3,000 families and educators from northeast San Fernando Valley charter
schools marched in
support of expanding high
quality schools, securing better facilities and protecting parent
choice in public education at last Saturday's «Rally in the Valley.»
Charter public
school parents and advocates made their voices clear at the ballot box in
support of parent
choice and improved access to
quality public
schools for every student.
Democratic and Republican candidates
supporting school choice were successful across the state, showing that Florida's families believe it is their right to choose the best high
quality school for their child, whether public, private, charter or virtual.
Position Summary: The Colorado League of Charter
Schools exists to improve student achievement and expand choice among high quality public schools by serving and supporting Colorado's charter s
Schools exists to improve student achievement and expand
choice among high
quality public
schools by serving and supporting Colorado's charter s
schools by serving and
supporting Colorado's charter
schoolsschools.
Great Public
Schools Now supports the expansion of high - quality choices for students in high need neighborhoods, which includes charter schools as well as many other types of public o
Schools Now
supports the expansion of high -
quality choices for students in high need neighborhoods, which includes charter
schools as well as many other types of public o
schools as well as many other types of public options.
We work in partnership with charter
schools and the community to
support, promote, and advocate for high
quality charter
schools that provide educational
choice to families statewide.
She values
quality education and
supports school choice.
The first
choice of most parents is to send their child to a high -
quality neighborhood
school; it is unclear how this bill
supports that
choice.
But on the positive side, Dei Rossi and other experts
support the additional, no - cost option that publicly - funded charters provide to parents who otherwise would have no
choice but to send their children to their traditional district's neighborhood
school, regardless of its
quality.
Those recommendations include a greater focus on
quality choices, simplifying all steps of the
school choice process, improving families» access to
school quality data, and strengthening the role that interpersonal networks play in
supporting families as they choose
schools for their children.
Learn how DCSRN helps fill an important gap of needed
support in the public
school choice sector and watch this video to hear from a parent how DCSRN's free services were instrumental in helping her access a
quality school for her child.
Under the guise of «
choice» to improve
schools for low - income children, WFF has
supported the unregulated growth of a privatized education industry — quantity over
quality, and «freedom» over regulation.
Working with grassroots activists on the ground to provide parents buses that can inform families about the
quality of
choice options (along with information on, for example, what a child should know by third grade) would not only improve data
quality, but also bolster
support for
school choice and education reform overall.
Tell Mayor de Blasio to
support policies that are proven to help students succeed, including phasing out failing
schools, investing in teacher
quality,
supporting high - performing charter
schools, and broadening
school choice.
This is
supported by the National Association of Realtors» ® Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers 2016, which found almost half of all buyers with children under 18 are influenced by the
quality of the
school district in their neighborhood
choice.