There are a host of papers that
support skeptical arguments but she did not do that fine an analysis.
Not exact matches
A number of
skeptical analysts have used job growth in the lower - wage «leisure and hospitality» sector to
support their
arguments that the labor market is merely optically healthy.
Sometimes he clearly grasps what he is talking about, at other times he is simply arm waving like a hummingbird and even if he perfectly understands his own post, it is not cogent to the
skeptical argument conveyed, nor does the technical correctness of it, in any way
support CAGW.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lead author, Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, has previously rebuked the
arguments of political scientist Bjorn Lomborg, contained in his book, The
Skeptical Environmentalist, for «selective inattention to inconvenient literature and overemphasis of work that
supports his lopsided views».