He didn't
support slavery in the first place so yes, being a spy was the more noble course of action.
Jesus would not
support slavery in any form.
If all the verses that clearly
support slavery in today's bible are untrue because they were scrambled over time, then how can you put stock in anything else said in the bible?
Two hundred years from now people will look back and say, how could people have
supported slavery in the 1800's?
when the bible
supports slavery in chapter after chapter, how do you justify that?
Not exact matches
He spent a night
in jail, July 24 or 25, 1846, to avoid
supporting slavery, inspiring generations.
In a newspaper article from May 1948, Rep. Buffett wrote, «
In a free country the monetary unit rests upon a fixed foundation of gold... independent of the ruling politicians... unless you are willing to surrender your children and your country to galloping inflation, war and
slavery, then this cause demands your
support... we must win the battle to restore honest money.»
Marr also mischaracterizes Daniel Webster, who opposed
slavery and opposed its extension into the territories but was willing to make political compromises about
slavery to preserve the Union; who fully expected
slavery to gradually disappear
in the Southern states; who
supported plans for the colonization of freedmen outside the United States; and who
in general held views on the subject that were strikingly similar to those of his follower and ardent admirer, Abraham Lincoln.
if you're from the US like i am, please move far, far away so those who believe
in the first amendment and
support all people the freedom to believe and live as they choose so we can focus on real issues like the economy, education, and ending oppression /
slavery throughout the world.
In modern society
slavery, or women being the property of a father / husband is seen as morally wrong, yet these beliefs are
supported as moral by the OT / NT.
What good are morals if the one giving them
supports morals that most people consider to be awful like
slavery and discrimination against women, gays and the handicapped, as well as beating children and slaves without punishment
in some cases?
God's «morals» come
in handy for Christian h0mophobes looking for an EXCUSE for their prejudice, but are ignored when any discussions come up that are embarrassing like
support for
slavery and discrimination against the handicapped.
Is this text clearly
in support of
slavery?
It is implicit
in these words, straight from his own mouth, that Jesus
supported or, at a minimum, was nonchalantly accepting of
slavery and the beating of slaves.
Loki, his «church» was quite literally FOUNDED on the principle that Southern
slavery was Biblical and just; further, that «church» has NEVER issued a binding, formal apology for its
support of
slavery, racial etiquette, and Jim Crow;
in fact, they were their most ardent supporters.
I challenge you to quote anything that I have ever said
in support of 19th century American
slavery.
Does that wisdom
in include
support for
slavery, discriminations and beating children with sticks for discipline like the Bible says?
And we
in the modern West are against
slavery and the racism that
supported it, right?
«
In particular, those who saw in Scripture a sanction for slavery were both more insistent on pointing to the passages that seemed so transparently to support their position and more confident in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss biblical truths.&raqu
In particular, those who saw
in Scripture a sanction for slavery were both more insistent on pointing to the passages that seemed so transparently to support their position and more confident in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss biblical truths.&raqu
in Scripture a sanction for
slavery were both more insistent on pointing to the passages that seemed so transparently to
support their position and more confident
in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss biblical truths.&raqu
in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss biblical truths.»
The Bill received its first reading
in the House of Lords on 26 June 2017 and highlights the fact that, once someone is freed from
slavery they often need medical treatment, mental health
support, legal advice and education.
observer «The Bible
supports:» «
slavery» = > No, the Bible begins to reign
in the abuse of slaves as was common and remind the Hebrew to never forget what it felt like for 430 years as oppressed slaves under Egypt; «I am the Lord your God who set you free from the
slavery of Egypt».
-- Christians were responsible for
slavery in the US — and this is
supported biblically (
in Leviticus) as theologically sound, even if immoral to our contemporary thinking.
Did he command genocide,
support slavery, and
in demanding his debt of flesh is he Shylock's archetype?
However, by 1995, the convention issued its Resolution on Reconciliation, publicly denouncing its past racism, and asking forgiveness for its role
in supporting slavery and segregation — an unprecedented action by a Southern denomination.
Christianity,
in its long history, has often not recognized or advocated for the individual rights that AMERICA stands for (Ephesians 6:5
supports slavery).
This classic essay explains and justifies his refusal, arguing that each citizen has a duty to resist a government whose actions —
in this case,
supporting slavery, mistreating Indians and prosecuting the Mexican - American War — offend the higher law of conscience.
Thus, for instance, Paul's apparent
support of
slavery lost its authority for us only after eighteen centuries and seventy or so generations, as the full implications of Jesus» message of the worth of each human being finally sank
in and became authoritative instead (at least with regard to
slavery).
Yet you seem to speak as if the truth of the practice of
slavery being immoral is universally understood and appeal to the teachings of Christ to
support this notion... yet He Himself never condemned it, even including the practice
in many of His parables.
So if we say that our slaves are equal but still overwork them, own them, mistreat them, and grossly underpay them, then we still deep down believe
in, endorse,
support and promote
slavery.
At the end of the day Anna, the bible is found to be far less reliable
in condemning homosexuality than it is
in supporting slavery and misogyny.
After all, God's Word was clear
in supporting slavery — right?
Someone mentioned
slavery — which is
supported in the law and I think most of us would agree that we are extremely glad this «practice of human subjugation» has ended.
Justin applies this approach to the passages of Scripture that seem to
support slavery: «With these standards
in mind, it became much easier to interpret Scripture's difficult passages consistently.
Democrats (and liberals
in particular) love to enforce economic
slavery to push forward their agenda and thus make people reliant on government programs to
support them.
jbhollen The bible does not
support sex
slavery in Exodus 21:7 - 11.
The Bible endorses
slavery, too, buster, and abolition was opposed because of passages
in the Bible that
support it.
Using additional criteria, (which we will discuss later), Webb asserts that the redemptive movement of Scripture
supports the abolition of
slavery, a more egalitarian approach to women's roles
in society, and the continued condemnation of homosexual behavhior.
All the good christians
in the south
supported slavery, KKK stll lurks here and there.
I can't
support the majority when they are terribley wrong...»
In defense of christians... you are referring to the southern cult (Baptists) that later apologized for its part in supporting slavery... and yes, they did it to keep gietting MONEY from the wealthy plantation owners who had started donating to the church.
In defense of christians... you are referring to the southern cult (Baptists) that later apologized for its part
in supporting slavery... and yes, they did it to keep gietting MONEY from the wealthy plantation owners who had started donating to the church.
in supporting slavery... and yes, they did it to keep gietting MONEY from the wealthy plantation owners who had started donating to the church...
When people are left out, when they're neglected, when they're not
supported, and when they're not given the love they need to grow, it becomes an incubator for trafficking, and this refugee crisis, if we want to be serious about ending
slavery, we can not ignore them, we can not ignore our
support for this issue
in that space, because otherwise, we're going to have to deal with it for years to come.
Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A)
in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding
in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about
slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who
supported, or fought against
slavery... many justified
slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?
Slavery in the United States was
supported by Christians who saw it as God's will, defending it with scripture and opposed by Christians who saw it as not God's will attacking it with scripture.
Christians have often had to reconsider their interpretation of the Bible
in light of new information, he argued, just as many did when they concluded
slavery was immoral
in spite of biblical instructions that seem to
support it.
Nowhere
in these verses does it say Christ
supported slavery.
Between July 2015 and July 2016 The Salvation Army
supported more than 4,300 potential victims of modern
slavery in England and Wales.
The Salvation Army was awarded the Government contract
in 2011 to provide specialist
support for adult victims of modern
slavery including safe accommodation, counselling, medical care, translation services and legal counselling.
These same people likely choose to
support some of the discriminations
in the Bible (like against gays), but choose NOT to
support the Bible when it comes to
slavery, beating children, etc..
Question: Do you believe that
slavery is moral because it is
supported in the bible?
It certainly forbids divorce except
in the case of adultery (and remarriage even then), but has no objection to
slavery; and appears to
support the subordination of women.
I wonder how he would feel if the introduction made mention of the fact that Christianity has been used to
support slavery, war, genocide, inquisitions, murders, and all kinds of injustices, including recent wars
in Uganda
in which children are kidnapped and forced into the «Lord's Liberation Army» by a man claiming to act on behalf of the God of the Bible.