Thus my own beliefs allow for and
support spiritual existence, and I could not hold these beliefs if I did not find them to have great persuasive power.
Not exact matches
He has a body, and it is in and through this body that his character must be developed, his physical
existence supporting and standing as a pledge for the reality of his rational and
spiritual commitments.
My argument is that while science does tell us much about the world around us, IT (science - our most favored epistemological standard) obviously only deals with the physical and can not disprove the
spiritual, and that there are other ways of knowing truth that do prove (
support is the word I prefer, since no «proof» is satisfactory to al epistemological standards) the
existence of God.
Cobb wants then to argue in
support of the Christian claim for the finality of Jesus Christ by making the case «that in
spiritual existence personal
existence was fulfilled and transformed» (SCE 140).