Sentences with phrase «support under a court order»

Not exact matches

In support of its restructuring and in order to satisfy its obligations under the plan of reorganization confirmed by the bankruptcy court, the Company closed the following financing transactions:

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».

However, under Canadian law, certain debts remain even in Bankruptcy: student loans less than seven years old, spousal or child support, alimony, debt arising from fraud, restitution orders and any court imposed fines.

However, certain debts are not dischargeable under Chapter 7; most student loans, recent taxes, alimony, child and court ordered support payments and drunk driving judgment.

As well, in many provinces these limits don't apply to those who are self - employed, or owe child support / alimony under a court order.

Most types of debt except: student loans, magistrates» court fines, maintenance payments or maintenance arrears ordered by a court, Child Support Agency or Child Maintenance Service arrears, money owed under a criminal confiscation order, debts resulting from certain personal injury claims and budgeting or crisis loans.

Most debts except: fines, penalties, compensation and forfeiture orders imposed by any court; any debt that has been incurred through fraud; student loans; any obligation to pay maintenance to an ex-spouse due under a court order (not Child Support Agency arrears or Child Maintenance Service arrears); and money owed to a creditor whose debt is secured on your property (such as a mortgage or secured loan).

Are there obvious constitutional problems with the state court order, and if so, under what theories and supported by what precedents?»

It is suggested that the agreement will be legally binding under s 9 (1) and (2) of the Child Support Act 1991 and its existence will entitle the court to make an order under s 4 (10) which will have the effect of preventing any further child support calculation for 12 Support Act 1991 and its existence will entitle the court to make an order under s 4 (10) which will have the effect of preventing any further child support calculation for 12 support calculation for 12 months.

«The court will retain jurisdiction to enforce payment of debt obligations, in the event a party files bankruptcy, including, but not limited to, the ability to determine the debt assigned is in the nature of Maintenance, necessity or support and is therefore non dischargeable in bankruptcy, and / or making a future spousal support order, regardless of the spousal support order set forth below under FOURTH: SPOUSAL SUPPORT.support and is therefore non dischargeable in bankruptcy, and / or making a future spousal support order, regardless of the spousal support order set forth below under FOURTH: SPOUSAL SUPPORT.support order, regardless of the spousal support order set forth below under FOURTH: SPOUSAL SUPPORT.support order set forth below under FOURTH: SPOUSAL SUPPORT.SUPPORT.»

Maintenance Enforcement Program: The Alberta Maintenance Enforcement Program (MEP) is authorized by the Alberta Maintenance Enforcement Act to ensure that individuals meet their obligations to pay spousal and child support under the terms of their court orders and certain agreements.

Under Tennessee law, the court shall issue a temporary order of child support in cases of disputed paternity.

The Supreme Court has recently supported the use of random stop and search powers allowed under s60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act on the basis this may save lives.

Section 281 (5) provides as follows: «Discharge does not, except to such extent and on such conditions as the court may direct, release the bankrupt from any bankruptcy debt which --(a) consists in a liability to pay damages [of specific types]... in respect of personal injuries to any person; or (b) arises under any order made in family proceedings or under a maintenance calculation made under the Child Support Act 1991.»

Under the Family Law Act or the Divorce Act, a court can order a support payor to designate the support recipient as the irrevocable beneficiary of a life insurance policy to ensure funds exist at the time of the payor's death to satisfy his (or her) support obligations specified in the support order.

(3) If a person having a duty to pay child support or spousal support under an agreement or order dies and the agreement or order is silent respecting whether the duty continues after the death of the person and is a debt of his or her estate, (a) the person receiving support may make an application under section 149 [orders respecting child support] or 165 [orders respecting spousal support], and (b) if, on consideration of the factors set out in subsection (1) of this section, an order is made, the duty to pay child support or spousal support continues despite the death of the person and is a debt of his or her estate for the period fixed by the court.

If no payment is required by paragraph 1, an additional payment to the insured person's dependants and the persons, other than a former spouse of the insured person, to whom the insured person had an obligation at the time of the accident to provide support under a domestic contract or court order, to be divided equally among the persons entitled, of,

Posted Monday, July 27th, 2015 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

The testator may be required, by court order or under a domestic contract, to pay support to a dependent ex-spouse or child.

If no payment is required by paragraph 1, an additional payment to the insured person's dependants and the persons, other than a former spouse of the insured person, to whom the insured person had an obligation at the time of the accident to provide support under a domestic contract or court order, to be divided equally among the persons entitled, in an amount equal to $ 25,000 if the accident occurred before October 1, 2003 or, if the accident occurred on or after October 1, 2003,

Under Florida law, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed by his or her own choice, the court can order child support based on the amount of income he or she could earn by pursuing more gainful employment.

I and my ex spouse agreed under a separation agreement incorporated, merged into and made part of the court order for a settlement of Child Support, Spouse Support and Medical Support of $ 1,036,570.00 USD he has only paid $ 350,500.00 February 18th, 2013 but still owing $ 686,070.00 and the stipulated time for the completion of payment May 17th, 2013 has long elapsed.

Posted Friday, August 27th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments»

Among other things: successfully obtaining the continuation of a US $ 2 billion freezing order under s. 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support of Russian proceedings; and successfully acting on an ex parte appeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiorder under s. 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support of Russian proceedings; and successfully acting on an ex parte appeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiorder — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben GriffiOrder was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiths).

In Priest, the self - represented appellant Mr. Reilly attempted to appeal a spousal support order made under Part III of the Family Law Act in the Hamilton Superior Court of Justice (Family Court) by proceeding directly to the Court of Appeal.

Court ordered amounts and payment schedules can not be altered without revisiting the support issue under the guidance of both an attorney and the court with appropriate jurisdicCourt ordered amounts and payment schedules can not be altered without revisiting the support issue under the guidance of both an attorney and the court with appropriate jurisdiccourt with appropriate jurisdiction.

However, the situation under the provincial Family Law Act was different: the Ontario court could still rule on questions relating to child support, since the foreign court in China had not already done so in its divorce order.

After pointing out that the husband would have an easier time satisfying his hefty support arrears without a bankruptcy trustee in the way — and after taking pains to clarify that such a discharge would have no effect on the wife's support entitlement (since by law a discharge does not release a person from child / spousal support or maintenance obligation arising under a court order), the court ordered him to pay $ 25,000 to the trustee immediately.

Allowing the Ontario court to continuing to make orders under the Family Law Act even though the Divorce Act provisions had been trumped was actually a harmonious outcome to ensure child support would be covered.

Posted Sunday, July 29th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

The Act lists a variety of proceedings in respect of which there is no limitation period (section 16): proceedings for declarations; proceedings to enforce court orders and other orders that are enforceable in the same way as court orders; proceedings under the Family Law Act relating to support; proceedings to enforce arbitration awards; proceedings by persons in possession of collateral to redeem or realize on it; proceedings arising from sexual assault in certain circumstances; proceedings to recover fines, taxes and penalties owing to the Crown; proceedings relating to claims by the Crown (or by a delivery agent under social welfare legislation) in various circumstances; proceedings to recover money owing in respect of certain student loans, awards and grants.

Some courts may find it desirable in modification proceedings to gradually implement the Guideline order over a period of time, especially where support computed under the Guideline is considerably higher than the amount previously paid.

The dependency benefits paid directly to a child who has reached the age of majority under the Social Security law, rather than to the custodial parent, as representative payee, do not fulfill the obligations of court - ordered child support.

The court rejected Stanley's argument, that in making her order for support, the trial judge erred by failing to consider the factors she was required to consider under the Divorce Act or by considering only certain factors in isolation.

The second is that where the court makes an express order requiring the parent with care to comply with contact arrangements, and that order is breached, then, in the interests of consistency, the judge must support the order by considering enforcement, either under the enforcement provisions in section 11J of the 1989 Child Act or by contempt proceedings.

Under the prior version of the law, the Foreign Country Money - Judgments Recognition Act, an authenticated copy of a foreign judgment, decree, or order could be directly filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of New Jersey, along with a supporting affidavit from the judgment creditor.

Although a Roanoke City Circuit Court ordered husband, who has been under guardianship of his mother and then his brother beginning in 1968, in 2001 to pay $ 250 in monthly spousal support after his 1993 Virginia divorce from wife and...

Some encouragement can be derived from provisions such as s 42 of the English Arbitration Act 1996, which explicitly allows courts to mandate compliance with tribunals» orders (albeit only as long as there is no agreement by the parties to the contrary and the seat of the arbitration is in England or Wales), and recent US case law under the Federal Arbitration Act in support of enforcement of tribunals» determinations relating to disclosure.

To vary support orders made under provincial acts, the courts apply the Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act support orders made under provincial acts, the courts apply the Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act (orders made under provincial acts, the courts apply the Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act Support Orders Act (Orders Act (ISOA).

(3) When the Ontario court acts under subsection (2), it may also make a temporary support variation order.

(6) If a provisional order made under this section comes before a court in a reciprocating jurisdiction and confirmation is denied in respect of one or more persons for whom support is sought, the Ontario court that made the provisional order may, on motion within six months after the denial of confirmation, reopen the matter, receive further evidence and make a new provisional order for a person in respect of whom confirmation was denied.

(4) If the Ontario court does not receive the information or documents requested under subsection (2) within 12 months after the request is made, it may dismiss the support application and terminate any temporary support order made under subsection (3).

23 This Part applies in respect of support orders that are made in Ontario or made in a reciprocating jurisdiction and registered in an Ontario court under Part III or the former Act, but not in respect of provisional orders or provisional variation orders.

(4) If the Ontario court does not receive the information or documents requested under subsection (2) within 12 months after the request is made, it may dismiss the support variation application and terminate any temporary support variation order made under subsection (3).

39 (1) The Ontario court may, on a party's motion, after taking into account any right of a government or delivery agent under section 45, vary a support order made or registered in Ontario under this Act or the former Act,

John Smith will pay to Jane Smith the sum of $ 800 per month for the support of the children, May Smith born June 1, 2011 and Lee Smith born July 3, 2012, commencing on October 1st 2015 and continuing on the first day of each and every month thereafter, for as long as the children are eligible for support under the Family Law Act or until further Court order.

Either parent can apply to vary (change) a child support order made under the Family Law Act provided 6 months have elapsed since the order was made or the court last dealt with an application to vary.

(2) Despite subsection (1), a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice may make a provisional order to vary a support order made in Canada under a provincial enactment by a federally appointed judge.

(6) If a provisional variation order made under this section comes before a court in a reciprocating jurisdiction and confirmation is denied in respect of one or more persons for whom support is payable, the Ontario court that made the provisional variation order may, on motion within six months after the denial of confirmation, reopen the matter, receive further evidence and make a new provisional variation order for a person in respect of whom confirmation was denied.

How do I handle requests for such references?Thank you so much for your help!CherylCHERYL M. EARLE3407 Old Dobbin Road, Montgomery, Alabama 36116 - 1903Home Phone: [phone] Cell Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [email protected] position managing legal discovery and document review with opportunity to assist attorneys with civil litigationBAR ADMISSIONAlabama State Bar, 1999LAW - RELATED EXPERIENCELaw Firm, AlabamaResearch Attorney for Special Projects, Mass Torts Department, November 2001 — February 2008 • Managed Multi-District Litigation (MDL) Document Depository (September 2002 to February 2008) o Reviewed more than 1 million pages of evidentiary documents for litigation purposes and for inclusion in electronic databaseso Coordinated document review assignments with attorneys at local depository and at other sites across the USo Retrieved, reviewed and coded documents in Concordance and Summation legal databaseso Prepared memoranda and spreadsheets providing detailed analysis of discovery materials • Aided attorneys and support staff with processing and preparation of personal injury claims and litigationo Conducted legal research and drafted pleadingso Conducted supplementary online research for additional documents and information pertinent to litigationo Assisted with preparation of correspondence to clients and referring attorneyso Contacted clients for additional information needed in case preparation, litigation, and potential settlementso Prepared and input case intakes and referrals into databaseLaw School, AlabamaStudent Intern, Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (ADAP), August 1996 — June 1997 • Participated in law school clinical program under third - year law student practice rule (as authorized by Alabama Supreme Court) o Assisted attorneys and advocates in cases involving mentally ill patients confined to state mental health facilitieso Interviewed clients in person (at state facilities) and over the phoneo Worked with clients, attorneys, and social workers to investigate and resolve issues concerning involuntary confinement and treatmento Aided in legal research on an appellate brief submitted to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (ruling granted in favor of our client) Faculty Research Assistant for Library Services, Bounds Law Library, March 1996 — June 1997 • Prepared research and teaching materials for law school faculty; worked 20 hours per week while matriculating 10 - 15 hours per semester) o Investigated copyright issues related to procuring and reproducing texts for academic useo Conducted legal research using WESTLAW, LEXIS and the InternetADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCEManufacturing Company (MC), Montgomery, AlabamaAdministrative Assistant and Cost Analyst, Materials Purchasing Department, April 1999 — September 2001 • Assisted materials buyers in negotiating and preparing commodities contracts between raw materials suppliers and MC for manufacturing plants in the US and Mexicoo Assisted Legal Department at MC's corporate headquarters with coordination and preparation of documents for litigationo Notified and educated suppliers about MC's freight - on - board policy and its corresponding Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provisions; result was the reduction of freight claims for both the company and its supplierso Prepared contracts and purchase orders for raw materials and capital projects involving plant maintenanceo Solicited price quotations from current vendors and established Excel spreadsheet format which simplified quote submission process and allowed MC to track and compare usage volumes and costs over timeo Prepared and analyzed cost reports used by materials buyers and production planners in purchasing decisions, including cost reductions, materials consolidation, and selection of vendorso Acted as liaison between vendors and the Purchasing, Transportation and Accounting Departments on issues concerning inbound freight, commercial carriers, and payment terms for commodities, resulting in reductions in freight costs and greater payment discounts for raw materialso Established online databases and printed directories for the Purchasing Department, allowing buyers to have easier and faster access to current vendor informationo Completed Year 2000 (Y2K) compliance project, which involved data collection and communication with MC's past, present, and potential materials suppliers and service providersNot - For - Profit Organization, AlabamaAdministrative Assistant, Combined Federal Campaign, September 1998 — January 1999 • Aided Campaign Director with 1998 Federal Campaigns (CFCs) in City 1 and City 2, which together generated nearly $ 700,000 for more than 1,000 local, national and international charitieso Prepared weekly reports on donations using WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, Excel and dBase IVo Wrote script for Talent Showcase at City 1's 1998 CFC Kickoffo Assisted Director with merger of the City 1 and City 2 CFCs in 1999Regional Bank, AlabamaAdministrative Assistant, Year 2000 (Y2K) Department, March — June 1998 • Worked with Vice President of Corporate Projects on short - term project for the bank's Y2K Departmento Analyzed and processed data on Y2K readiness for all branches of Bank throughout the southeastern USo Organized meetings for personnel of Banko Communicated with vendors of computer hardware, software, and office equipment to request information on Y2K complianceo Prepared compliance files for Federal Reserve auditso Prepared in - house memoranda and reports using Microsoft Word and ExcelRecord / Music Promotion Company, AlabamaRecord Pool Co-Founder; Office Manager, September 1990 — December 1991 • Co-founded record pool to enhance promotion of music in Alabama and the southeastern USo Procured and distributed records from major and independent labels for club, radio and mobile disc jockeyso Coordinated jointly sponsored promotional events with record companies, radio stations and clubso Designed, wrote, and published bi-weekly reports and brochures to inform the music industry of the progress and popularity of music and performers in the region, with specific focus on the Alabama music sceneMajor University, AlabamaGraduate Research Assistant, AUM Department of Marketing, June 1989 — August 1990 • Worked 13 - 20 hours per week as a research assistant to Marketing faculty while carrying a full course load in the MBA programo Analyzed consumer surveys used in academic researcho Assisted Conference Chairperson with coordination for Atlantic Marketing Association (AMA) annual meeting (October 1989) o Co-authored five - year index and classification of AMA Proceedings (published Fall 1991) EDUCATIONLaw School, AlabamaJuris Doctor (JD), 1997 • Scholarshipso Seybourn H. Lynne Scholarship, 1996 - 97o Dexter C. Hobbs Memorial Scholarship, 1995 - 96o E. W. Godbey Memorial Scholarship, 1994 - 95 • Honorso Who's Who Among American Law School Students, 1996 - 94o Arthur Davis Shores Award, 1997 • Activitieso Frederick Douglass Moot Court Team Manager, 1996 - 97 Southern Regional Competition, Second Place National Competition, Eighth Placeo John A. Campbell Moot Court Competition, Spring 1996o Black Law Students Association Delegate, BLSA National Convention, 1997 Co-Chairperson, Public Relations Committee, 1996 - 97 Chairperson, Public Relations Committee, 1995 - 96 BLSA President's Award, 1996 and 1997o American Bar Association, 1996 - 97 Entertainment and Sports Industries Forum Intellectual Property Section Law Student Divisiono LAWS Student Group Leader, 1995 - 96Major University, AlabamaMaster of Business Administration (MBA), 1990Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (B.S.B.A.), 1988 (Major: Marketing — Advertising and Promotion Track) • Honorso Dean's List • Activitieso National Student Advertising Competition Team, 1988 - 90 Seventh District Competition: Third Place, 1990o Marketing Club, 1987 - 90 Vice President — Career Development, 1988 - 89o Public Relations / Advertising (PR / AD) Club, 1988 - 90 Charter Member, 1988 Active in fund - raising and membership driveso Theater Guild, 1988 - 90 Screening Committee, 1989REFERENCESAvailable upon request