I can no longer
support young earth creationism in good conscience.
Not exact matches
E.g., in regards to scientific
support for evolution and rejection of
creationism and the
young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of
creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.
According to this chart, the Christian worldview includes belief in
young earth creationism,
support for the death penalty, a commitment to mind / body dualism, rejection of non-traditional family structure, and devotion to fee enterprise and capitalism.
TheTraveler:
Creationism has no place in a science class because there is no scientific evidence to support it, and there is strong scientific evidence against «young earth» c
Creationism has no place in a science class because there is no scientific evidence to
support it, and there is strong scientific evidence against «
young earth»
creationismcreationism.