Sentences with phrase «support your claim as»

We can support this claim as the Corolla diesel remained vibration free and reasonably quiet even at the top of its rev range.

Other moral arguments support the claim as well.

Not exact matches

In light of the Israeli claims and the impending May 12 deadline, Congressional committees should press adviser Bolton and Secretary Pompeo on the specific sections of the Iran deal that evidence supports are being violated by Iran and to seek assurances on U.S. actions to continue diplomatically to address these as provided in the JCPOA itself.

As proposals advance through the system, they gain support and weight from various quarters and can eventually be claimed and properly attributed to their authors.

If your down - on - her - luck pal has been sleeping on your sofa for the past year and earned less than $ 4,050 while you've been mostly supporting her (or him), then you may be able to claim the sponger — er, friend — as a dependent and deduct up to $ 4,050 on your federal return, even though the two of you are not related at all.

The EU team alleged that websites such as Sputnik had spread false notions such as the idea that the Balearic Islands also wanted to declare independence — a claim not supported by any opinion poll or by the islands» local assemblies.

Ellison said that Oracle's cloud computing strategy takes into account the idea that customers want to use a mix of their own data centers, as well as those from providers, an idea that some refer to as a «hybrid cloud,» which Microsoft has also claimed it supports.

In determining a taxpayer's eligibility to claim a dependency exemption, these proposed regulations change the IRS's position regarding the adjusted gross income of a taxpayer filing a joint return for purposes of the tiebreaker rules and the source of support of certain payments that originated as governmental payments.

For example, HomeKit for smart home features appears to be gaining more vendor support, the announcement mentions ESPN as a media partner which likely will be followed by many more in the category, and SiriKit integration is claiming integration with Evernote and other productivity apps.

Susan Jones is a researcher uncovering the truth about the Massey tunnel replacement project While the public has shown support for a new crossing over the south arm of the Fraser River, there is no «overwhelming support» for the planned $ 3.5 billion planned bridge as claimed by B.C.'s Minister of Transportation, Todd Stone.

Dale Brown, FSI's president and CEO, stated on the call that FSI, as well as the other groups joining the suit, «has supported a uniform fiduciary standard since 2009 — before Dodd - Frank became law... but the Department of Labor's complex and unworkable rule will only harm the smaller investors it claims to protect.»

Entrepreneur, Five - Step Guide to Marketing a Business As Green: The best way to avoid these claims, according to Shel Horowitz, CEO of Greenandprofitable.com, is to keep messages consistent and support every claim with incontrovertible evidence.»

Under Andresen's definition, which you can check out here, any one of the three versions could claim the throne as long as they have a majority of community and industry support.

If you have fantastic content on your website, such as an infographic with unique insights, or an in - depth blog post written by an industry expert on your staff, journalists at major media publications may find it helpful to cite those resources to support claims within stories that they're writing.

If it's to compensate for emotional distress well, then, that seems awfully low (and in United credit, not cash as well — it wouldn't even cover United's pet in cabin fee for a pet that isn't claimed to be an emotional support animal).

I believe pet in cabin policies should be more liberal than they are currently, and that cost and restrictiveness have led to the explosion of using the claim of emotional support as a justification to avoid those rules.

The Internal Revenue Service will expect you to have documents such as receipts, bank statements and supporting documentation for any business deductions you claim.

Indeed, the Nikkei newspaper, often perceived as a forum for strategic media trial balloons in advance of policy decisions, claims that support for further easing is growing within the BOJ.

While realizing it's literally impossible for an advisor or client to learn and retain all the rules and nuances of a system as complex as the Social Security retirement system, Cheryl was passionate about developing a training course and providing the ongoing support and expertise advisors need in order to solve even the most complex of Social Security claiming riddles.

He then goes on to assert that it is simply not true that strength and weakness in gold stocks tells us anything about the future performance of gold, which as anyone with a little bit of experience in trading this sector knows is incorrect, even if he tries to support his claim with presumably carefully cherry - picked statistics.

We can go back as far as we want, but heck we will just stop it conveniently at the point that best supports the claim of Israel.

I do not, as I have stated, have any love for the religious fundamentalists in this country, but I do not see any evidence that supports your claim.

Not support — prove, as you claimed above.

As such it would seem that you are either claiming Jesus doesn't support the Bible or you are being disingenuous by claiming that Jesus did not speak those words but did support the same concept.

@Noah, That book is ridiculous... He claims the universe is likely younger than 13.7 b.y. and backs it up by claiming that 100 + measurements taken over the past 300 years supports the claim that light does not travel at a constant rate... As if people 300 years ago could measure with the kind of accuracy we can today

Faith is «Mental acceptance of and confidence in a claim as truth without proof supporting the claim» (Wiktionary).

Without this evidencial support, any claim regarding knowledge of that gods» intentions, actions or desires is not valid and must be dismissed as fiction.

This whole thing got started because you claimed there was as much support for Zeus as there was for the God of Abraham.

And I have sought to show, using Hartshorne as a concrete example, how a dialectical defense provides the ultimate support for one's claims about experience and its essential temporality and how that dialectic rests on claims quite remote from any direct or straightforward reading of experience, whether private or public.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

As you know, the claim of «abuse» doesn't make it so, but your fearless openness with supporting facts and information is compelling.

You claimed science proves the Bible wrong as to Joshua's account of the moon and sun stopping which is false and can not be supported by science (including Newton's law which you interjected)

Julie, as you correctly point out, has offered support for her claims, and the principle figures in this mess have answered with nothing more than outright dismissal and disdain for her, and that — at least to my mind — gives the lie to their protestations of innocence, whether before the fact or after.

In order to calculate the probability of a specific miracle claim with mathematical integrity, other factors such as the evidence supporting the claimed event must also be taken into account.

If Ehrman is right, it would seem that historical studies could never support the validity of miracle claims such as the resurrection.

Now they're using «religious» tactics, claiming scripture as an excuse to proudly support Romney.

As you have brought this up I will mention the accusations either of abuse or supporting abuse akin to supporting Jone's abuse of Julie that you have claimed.

Where this tendency claims support from the New Testament this is justified only in so far as the difference between the cultic worship of God in a temple as a «sacred»

You have got it all wrong, but may I ask that what poof do you have about what you claim, Allah is the almighty and is not a deceiver, Allah in the Qur» an in referred as the most merciful, all forgiving, creater of everything and self subsistence he does not require anyone to support him and Allah is having no son neither wife, and tell me how can a almighty supreme being have sexual relations?

I'm fine with you or anyone else believing in a god, but to claim this discovery as proof or even support of that belief is unnecessary and even detrimental to the larger argument for a god.

Much of my work in Character and the Christian Life (Trinity University Press, 1975) is an attempt to articulate a philosophical psychology (the self as agent) sufficient to support these claims for the importance of character in theological ethics.

I find that Whitehead's exposition is question - begging and seriously misleading.4 The exposition is misleading insofar as it suggests that belief in either a specific or generic causal nexus is adequately justified by a subject's experience of CE alone and not ultimately by systematic considerations, particularly those related to prehension.5 If Whitehead's theory of perception was intended to stand alone without support from the rest of his system, as Ford suggests (EWM 181 - 182), then I claim that it is insufficiently justified insofar as a part of it, the theory of CE, is inadequately justified.

Islam mentioned this for the longest time and as you can imagine, at a time when people had no access or means to verify those claims (people like yourself, opted to disbelief and argue about the existence of God) but now that those scientific «discoveries» became realities and the same as supported by the Quran (that was sent to Prophet Mohammed, Peace and Blessings be upon him), from God), it only solidifies Islam as the true religion of God.

This is where Hartshorne could, and in some implicit ways does, drive a wedge in Brightman's view, because Brightman is willing as a point of method to collapse metaphysical questions into epistemological questions.29 Hartshorne is not so willing, and thinks personalism must employ both inductive (empirical) and transcendental argumentation to support its own claims.

In treating so wide a range of problems as appear in this study, adequate documentation and scholarly support of the statements made would require erudition that the author can not claim.

Jefferson's claim that man's innate moral sense refers simply to the fact that he was «destined for society» and not «the to kalon, truth, etc., as fanciful writers have imagined,» would lend further support to this view.

So for them to think a blogger who has allowed discussion on the issues surrounding Tony as a public figure who used his privilege to control — is going to take it down blog posts simply because those who support the NPD or the NPD himself claims the «court» says so, must think we all fell off the turnip truck.

Scientism claims that the natural world is all there is, that supernatural explanations of the world are irrational, that everything can be reduced to physical causes, and that the only things we can know as true are those which Science reveals — supported by evidence, submitted to experimentation, and reviewed by peers.

Claiming authority primarily as a «historian,» Lindsell adduces a string of quotations to support his position and then devotes the larger and more controversial part of his book to detailing the supposedly modern declension from this stance in the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, among the Southern Baptists, at Fuller Theological Seminary, in the Evangelical Covenant Church, and even among the members of the ETS (the Evangelical Theological Society, whose members are required to subscribe annually to a single statement — that «the Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written, and therefore inerrant in the autographs»).

Christianity claims events that are not supported in the records of avid chroniclers such as the Romans and Egyptians.