Failing to debate the issue allows weak and poorly
supported arguments on both side of this debate to flourish.
Not exact matches
This approach is especially poisonous when examples are given of Christian views
on both
sides of the
argument, as this leaves the impression that you can be a Catholic and
support either
side, because Catholics are Christians.
Astronomers
on all
sides made scriptural and theological
arguments to
support their ideas.
Even though the religious often mock things like evolution I really don't see why we need to sink to their level of
argument, especially when we have the evidence
on our
side to
support our
arguments, right?
That is to say that people
on either
side of the
argument can quote considerable selections of scripture that seem clearly to
support their
side.
This is why I believe it's so important to study both historical religious
arguments supporting the abolition of slavery and historical religious
arguments opposing the abolition of slavery (see my post
on Mark Noll's The Civil War as a Theological Crisis» for a sampling), as well as historical religious
arguments supporting desegregation and historical religious
arguments opposing desegregation — not because I believe both
sides are equal, but because the patterns of argumentation that emerge are so unnervingly familiar:
Earlier writers had recognized that Volkmar went too far in his attempted demonstration of Mark's dependence upon Paul — he found evidence of such dependence
on almost every page of the Gospel — but his view was such a welcome relief from the one -
sided Tübingen theory, according to which Mark was a «neutral» in the great apostolic controversy over Jewish Christianity, that the main thesis of Volkmar was accepted without careful scrutiny of his
supporting arguments.
I'm not going to interject into the lengthy
argument here, but I want to comment
on David» comment:» it is becoming more and more evident that there are those who are victims and
support the right of victims to be heard and believed, and then there's the
side of those who victimize and their supporters.There seems to be no grey area in between.»
What Ryan Anderson is «peddling» is an
argument,
supported by evidence, that makes people
on the other
side squirm.
But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the
arguments on either
side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to
support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.
Metz,
on his
side, denies that any one party or class should see itself as the subject of universal history; 28 and Whitehead's vision allows, even requires, an
argument that
supports the Christian concern for «the least».
Asked if there is
support in the PLP for a ballot, Hoon says there are «very strong views»
on both
sides of the
argument.
Each sheet contains activities such as defining key terms and taking notes
on different parts of the unit and Biblical quotes around the
side of the sheet to remind students of including key quotes to
support their
arguments.
At first, start the writing by choosing a right topic and after selecting a topic, you need to provide solid information to
support your own point of views
on this matter and be prepared for any
argument that you may receive from the opposite
side.
However, while there is no scientific evidence to
support most of the claims made
on either
side of the
argument, knowing that dog e-collars cause distress in pet dogs may be enough to seek alternative methods.
I've seen several commentators make very intelligent
arguments to that effect (and they've got some
support in the case law, even though I come down
on the other
side)... but I've never seen it from Steyn himself.
Thousands of cientists that go
on about their job and do research and publish do not have the fame and stardom status of scientists that
support the «anything but man»
side of the
argument.
If those who oppose wind power have the truth
on their
side, why do they have to resort to fallacious
arguments, twisted truths, misinterpreted facts, misinterpreted data, anonymous reports, and analyses by maverick amateurs to
support their case?
Over time, through loss after loss at the hands of lawyers
on the other
side, I also learned the value of legal writing — of crafting an
argument to
support my positions.
Should the case go to trial, our attorneys will continue to fight
on behalf of clients to ensure that their
side of the story and all relevant facts in
support of their
argument are conveyed to the court.
1.2.3.0 ==================== - Set working directory for file / executable launch - Minor bug fixes 1.2.2.0 ==================== - App repackaging to improve stability - Add «Run as administrator» launcher option - Update Top Bar, Menu, Tiles Grid with respect to Fluent Design System - Move Menu entries to Top Bar - Fix a minor bug preventing some executable files from being launched 1.2.1.0 ==================== - Add «
Support» section - Change label titles in Launcher Section - Set File / Exe Tiles to launch
on foreground - Remove
Side Menu transparency when collapsed - Fix a bug crashing the app when importing old Tile Backups format 1.2.0.0 ==================== - Add «Rate the App» section - Add Save Group and Sort option - Fix a bug preventing launch of programs with
arguments containing spaces - Fix a bug preventing pin of multiple tiles when Tile grouping is enabled 1.1.0.0 ==================== - Public Release