Sentences with phrase «supported by scripture»

the Virgin birth is supported by Scripture as well as other sources.

Faithless: the Virgin birth is supported by Scripture as well as other sources.

Of the seven sacraments he held that only baptism and the Lord's Supper are supported by Scripture.

The view that salvific faith is a gift of God is not supported by Scripture.

Everything you have cited above is supported by scripture found in the Old Testament with the exemption of women teaching men.

There are «supposed» truths that many protestants accept that can not be supported by scripture.

These statements are all false doctrines not supported by Scripture.

In contrast, because the things I said are supported by scripture, that does indeed make those things a FACT.

Your claim that things supported by scripture is based on your belief that the bible is the inerrant, infallible word of god, which is your opinion.

One great benefit to this way of viewing God's delay is that it seems to be supported by Scripture.

For instance, Chapter 15 on the laity begins with a broad discussion about how the Church grew, covering the establishment of monasteries and convents, Mass in Latin, the removal of rood screens and the history of the Reformation; while Chapter 16, on Our Lady, goes through the titles given to her, in order to answer criticisms that these titles and honours can not be supported by Scripture.

I am talking about something being Biblically supported by Scripture.

This conclusion is supported by the Scriptures in a passage that has often been ignored or forgotten by academic theology.

Not exact matches

[57:25] We sent our messengers supported by clear proofs, and we sent down to them the scripture and the law, that the people may uphold justice.

While that opinion may be supported by a literal reading of certain portions of the ancient writings which are revered as scripture, I find that attitude to be both deplorable and shortsighted.

By the end of it, Flournoy had in fact reached the opposite conclusion: that LDS doctrine is true, supported both by Mormon scriptures and the BiblBy the end of it, Flournoy had in fact reached the opposite conclusion: that LDS doctrine is true, supported both by Mormon scriptures and the Biblby Mormon scriptures and the Bible.

Nor is it appropriate to choose an opinion supported by a handful of texts at best and to discard an alternate view that has the support of many multiples more of scripture passages from Genesis to Revelation.

If you compared my writing from ten years ago with the writing I do today, I use different terminology, different approaches to proving my point, different vocabulary, and I even have different theological beliefs, supported by reading passages of Scripture in different ways, all to accomplish different goals in the minds and hearts of those who read.

My take from Scriptures is that there are options — to be like Paul (1 Cor 9:6, 12b), or to opt to be financially supported by the church (1 Cor 9:4, 7 - 14).

If it is so easy to ignore a major and substantial religious practice repeatedly uplifted, enshrined and required by the Torah and by all the scripture that follows, why is it so hard to let go of two verses that have substantially less biblical mention and support and no contemporary justification?

You said my addition was improper because it wasn't supported by any other parts of scripture.

By «God» I mean the pervasive personal presence, distinct from me and prior to me, who is the source and support of my existence; who through Scripture makes me realize that he has towards me the nature and name of love - holy, lordly, costly, fatherly, redeeming love; who addresses me, really though indirectly, in all that Scripture shows of his relationship to human beings in history, and especially in the recorded utterances of his Son, Jesus Christ; and who is daily drawing me towards a face - to - face encounter and consummated communion with him beyond this life, by virtue of «the redemption which is in Christ Jesus» (RoBy «God» I mean the pervasive personal presence, distinct from me and prior to me, who is the source and support of my existence; who through Scripture makes me realize that he has towards me the nature and name of love - holy, lordly, costly, fatherly, redeeming love; who addresses me, really though indirectly, in all that Scripture shows of his relationship to human beings in history, and especially in the recorded utterances of his Son, Jesus Christ; and who is daily drawing me towards a face - to - face encounter and consummated communion with him beyond this life, by virtue of «the redemption which is in Christ Jesus» (Roby virtue of «the redemption which is in Christ Jesus» (Rom.

Canonical scripture used by communities to shape their identity has that characteristic of being subject to manipulation in order to support whatever the later interpreters of the tradition want to have ratified.

You want to demonstrate «your» truth by signs and works that you have been part of and experienced but show no scriptural support or choose to apply scripture as your own private interpretation!

The fact that people are tempted to abuse Scripture by calling upon it to support whatever they believe is one of the reasons it is inappropriate most of the time to think that the primary theological debate is about whether the biblical text is authoritative or not.

These words from Vatican I are fully supported by many passages of Scripture, from the Book of Wisdom to the Letter to the Romans.

By the teachings of one interpretation I am going to Hell, and while I hold to a Free Grace position I can not help but be terrified when someone shows me scripture that supports that, whether or not their understanding of the passage is correct or not.

As you search the Scriptures, here are a few books I would recommend for those embarking on learning in this particular area as companions are: — «Changing My Mind» by David Gushee; — «Torn: Rescuing the Gospel from the Gays vs. Christians Debate» by Justin Lee; — «A Letter to My Congregation: An Evangelical Pastor's Path to Embracing Those Who are Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Into the Company of Jesus» by Ken Wilson; and — «God and the Gay Christian: The Biblical Case in Support of Same - Sex Relationships» by Matthew Vines.

-------------------------- Then support your claim about babies going to hell by using Scripture.

theo «Then support your claim about babies going to hell by using Scripture.»

Israel, surrounded by Arab nations that interpret Scripture in quite a different fashion from Jews or Christians, would lean on the weakest possible support if its claim to its 1967 border were to rest even partially on Scripture.

The end result is that we can agree with much of what science says about the formation of the Grand Canyon while at the same time, seeing that such views are supported and defended by Scripture.

Slavery in the United States was supported by Christians who saw it as God's will, defending it with scripture and opposed by Christians who saw it as not God's will attacking it with scripture.

I concluded that post by saying that there were various texts in Scripture which supported this perspective so that the God revealed in Jesus Christ is also the God revealed in the events surrounding the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.

I remember being told by pastors and church leaders that «gay Christian» (or «bisexual Christian» or «transgender Christian») is an oxymoron and that no one who holds a high view of Scripture can support same - sex relationships.

The second pronouncement, on abortion, enjoys little if any direct support from Scripture, but is confirmed by early Church tradition and by the constant teaching of the magisterium, at least in our century.

Indeed, when St. Paul does happen to mention a relevant text from the Hebrew Scriptures — «You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain» (Deut 25:4)-- he does so simply to apply it by a kind of allegorical interpretation to the economic support of those who preach the gospel.

Following the dangerous reference to Antichrist, Luther said with a deep subjectivism which frightened Spalatin: «Daily greater and greater help and support wells up in me by virtue of the authority of Holy Scripture.»

These doctrines you espouse are just the philosophies of men mingled with, yet not supported by, scripture.

I don't know what else to say but that she has gone off the deep end on this one, the way that she presents her position in this article as being supported by history, and scripture is almost offensive.

The peasants who have now banded together in Swabia have formulated their intolerable grievances against the rulers in twelve articles, and have undertaken to support them with certain passages of Scripture... the thing that pleases me most... is that they offer to accept instructions... Since I have a reputation for being one of those who deal with the Holy Scriptures here on earth, and especially as one whom they mention and call upon by name in the second document, I have all the more courage and confidence in openly publishing my instruction.

Downing's examples include: the Church's stubborn marriage to geocentricism, the brutal persecution of the Anabaptists by Protestants for believing that confession should precede baptism, the use of Scripture to support owning slaves and marginalizing women.