Sentences with phrase «supported by argument»

This position is supported by the argument of Lord Kerr — one of the drafters of Article 50 TEU — that notification is revocable.

The assignment allows them to share their views, «but they have to justify them in a way that's supported by argument and reason,» the teacher explains.

However, his arguments that lower corporate income tax rates pay for themselves is not supported by his arguments.

This idea should be supported by arguments and examples.

Indeed, the idea is the basis of any writing assignment which is supported by arguments and understandable word expressions.

Access to justice and legal aid will only escape the axe — and rightly so — if they can be supported by arguments that the government of the day can understand and accept.

This is supported by arguments that PTSD is difficult to observe in young children due to problems in identifying avoidance symptoms, a further criterion of PTSD.

Not exact matches

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, both conservatives, hinted during an hour - long argument in the case at support for the Justice Department's stance that because Microsoft is based in the United States it was obligated to turn over data sought by prosecutors in a U.S. warrant.

The stimulus arguments made by proponents of a higher minimum wage tend to both fairly weak (not a lot of empirical support) and the benefits fairly small relative to the size of the economy.

«You often get more by finding out what the other person wants than you do by clever arguments supporting what you need.»

If you have an investment thesis you like, run it by people who support the other side of the argument.

The commonplace argument that increases in the volume of immigration, by themselves, lower wages and take jobs from Americans - an argument which Attorney General Jeff Sessions used to defend ending DACA - has neither empirical nor theoretical support in economics.

In the notice of his decision, New York Supreme Court Justice Manuel Mendez supported the arguments made by Schneiderman at the November 25 hearing and did not appear to be sympathetic to or convinced by those of DraftKings or FanDuel attorneys.

The Nunes memo misleadingly supported this argument by omitting the fact that Carter Page left the Trump campaign in late September of 2016, weeks before the initial FISA application to surveil him was filed on Oct. 21.

Try to limit yourself to one key argument, supported by 10 - 12 facts or statistics.

The reasons given by employers for their support of a minimum wage increase were similar to arguments we've heard on Inc.com before, including:

In fact, one of the arguments used by TransCanada to gain American support for the $ 7 - billion Keystone pipeline is the more than 250,000 jobs the project will create for the U.S. economy.

The argument from people in support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining.

The argument from Gavin and other who supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed).

Not counting this form of compensation as an expense was a ridiculous accounting practice, and one that was supported by ridiculous arguments by lobbyists and the lawmakers who wanted to protect their corporate constituents who were getting rich.

The references to baptisms for the dead is by Paul — IN SUPPORT — of his argument that the resurrection is a reality.

To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization from features found in human experience is not sufficient to justify the claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical argument rather than intuition or generalization is necessary to support the claim that experience is essentially temporal.

Indeed, the Common Doctor, St. Thomas Aquinas, sets forth in both the Summa Theologiae and the Summa Contra Gentiles arguments in support of the death penalty that are subtle and leave much room for the exercise of prudence by lawmakers.

This is arguable, but no argument can be offered in support of Schindler's dreams inspired by the Oslo agreement that should cause him to dismiss out of hand the fears aroused by it.

As I believe was pointed out to you, this quote is in response to a teleological argument which is simply not supported by what we see in nature.

By contrast the second kind of argument mounted under the banner of process hermeneutics supports a claim that such - and - such a tenet of process theology is «Biblical theology» in the sense of being compatible with what some Biblical texts say on a theological topic.

Kraus supports her view by producing an argument against what she apparently takes to be the only alternative position open to Whiteheadians, the «interpretation of God as a personal order of divine occasions» of Charles Hartshorne (p. 163).

This is by far the greatest argument — supported by religion and the faith that normally tries to destroy it — that I have ever read.

No man [should] be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor [should he] be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor... otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief... All men [should] be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and... the same [should] in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.

@godfreenow In logic, an argument is made when a claim is supported by a set of premises, which both support the other one.

Predictably, she has been savaged by those in the GLBT community who rely on the «born gay» argument, supposedly supported by science, to justify sexual orientation being analogous to race and thus to be accepted and celebrated as a «given» of the human condition.

Concealing the Word of God [2:76] And when they meet the believers, they say, «We believe,» but when they get together with each other, they say, «Do not inform (the believers) of the information given to you by GOD, lest you provide them with support for their argument concerning your Lord.

The addition of the doctrine of internal relations as a necessary condition for evolution can clarify three arguments used by Birch to support his claim that low levels of order, such as particles, must have a subjective as well as a mechanical aspect.

Greider, a senior journalist at the Nation, and Wight, an economist at the University of Richmond, understand that capitalism is more than a technical economic system and that it is supported by more than rational argument.

So long as the prevailing view is that they are not necessarily wrong, public policy in a pluralistic system must be indifferent to any beliefs that can not be independently supported by rational (utilitarian) argument.

The validity of the results of the reflection can be supported only by the book as a whole, but the structure of the book and of the argument can only be understood in the light of the a priori considerations as well.

That seems to me an adequate ground to reject the argument made by Peter Singer last year in the London Spectator that supports not only abortion but infanticide.

Thus Barth and Brunner were hotly at one another; and Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul Tillich, so we are told, made theology interesting and vital at Union Seminary by the arguments between them, even as they supported and respected one another deeply.

Although at first this argument was used to support a conservative form of Catholicism, as time passed it could also be used to derive norms by which religious beliefs could be judged.

This popular support has been generated not by ethical arguments but by emotional reactions to the horrifying ways some people are dying.

First he secured by specious argument a following in the city of Shechem and then broadened and supported his rule by violence — until at length violence in turn happily removed him.

Hartshorne evidently recognizes the force of this reasoning because the other line of argument by which he at least appears to support his claim for a distinct class of theological analogies is to appeal to just such a direct experience of God.

Nowadays even the most conservative defenders of the «bodily resurrection» of Jesus do not hesitate to support their case by arguments resting on an historical or literary basis.

In order to anticipate for the reader the line of argument to be followed and so to facilitate progress, it will first be urged that the concept of God's operation as an enduring, active support of cosmic reality, must be elaborated in such a way that this divine operation itself is envisaged as actively enabling finite beings themselves by their own activity to transcend themselves, and this in such a way that if the concept holds good in general, it will also hold good for the «creation of the spiritual soul» (see below, section 3a).

Would I have been willing to sacrifice my reputation as a «Bible - believing Christian» by rejecting biblical arguments used to support segregation and oppose civil disobedience?

Instead, too many atheists simply regurgitate the «official» atheist position (ironic, given that this is what they accuse believers of doing vis - a-vis the Bible...), not only without having read the book recently enough to cite it accurately, but also not taking into account the most recent arguments supporting or undermining — not only by believers, but by atheist scientists as well.

In an earlier attack he argues that (for some reason) using the «if, then» argument (if torturing a man will held defend our troops, then we ought to torture him) to support the use of torture by government officials on our enemies, isn't legitimate, because (crazy logical leap) many interrogators say torture doesn't work -LRB-!?).

This stringency seems to provide some grounds for the type of probability - based anti-evolutionary argument that Dawkins sets out to refute in Climbing Mount Improbable, and provides some support for the arguments Johnson makes in Reason and the Balance concerning the unlikelihood of major evolutionary transitions occurring solely by Darwinian mechanisms.

and ironically, you're not even humbled by the shallowness of the arguments arrayed for your support (infinite regress, something out of nothing, etc.).

It follows from this that to support the rightfulness of euthanasia with a number of essentially different arguments is to put oneself in the wrong from the outset by admitting indirectly that no single absolutely cogent argument exists.