Sentences with phrase «supported by atheist»

Most of my points came from this article, if you wish to see our point of reason, supported by atheist scientists.

And what the Chinese government is doing is no worse than what several theocracies around the world are doing and what assholes like Rick Santorum would do in the USA if given the chance — none of which is supported by atheists.

Not exact matches

Marx, by the way, was an atheist and no support of religion of any kind.

It's refreshing that the great atheist trash Crom has finally arrived at a satisfying, factual conclusion supported by evidence!

The point is that Christians need so many answers, none of which is supported by any evidence at all, whereas the atheist only needs one answer for all of them: There is no God.

First, atheists directly challenge their beliefs by pointing out the flaws in their reasoning and answers, and relentlessly pointing out there is no evidence to support any of their beliefs.

It was established and is supported financially (and otherwise) much more heavily by non-Catholics (even atheists) than by Catholics.

Not even the most outspoken atheists in the world would try and discredit something that happened in the Bible since it is supported time and time again by archeological and scientific evidence.

# 1 & 3 are about as simple as you can get, certainly understandable by anyone who recognizes God as lord and creator, and even if you are an atheist, these are still just as simple, supported by science, and any law of nature you care to embrace.

Atheists believe that ALL claims must be supported by objective evidence, and that we are obligated to withhold belief until such evidence is presented.

Truth for atheists is defined as fact supported by evidence.

I think this is due to the fact that atheists are a small minority in the US and they are responding to the marginalization of their beliefs in what is supposed to be a country that supports freedom of (and therefore from) religious expression by lashing out.

Are you man enough to research and solve simple things, or are you too pampered by atheists to bother to read the instructions and notice you'll suffocate without life support on Mars?

Instead, too many atheists simply regurgitate the «official» atheist position (ironic, given that this is what they accuse believers of doing vis - a-vis the Bible...), not only without having read the book recently enough to cite it accurately, but also not taking into account the most recent arguments supporting or undermining — not only by believers, but by atheist scientists as well.

And there is one sure thing Atheist / agnostic know for a fact: It was not the fairy - tail in the sky supported by man made invented books that created humans.

Its so much drama stirred up really by the atheists and the gays to support their points and win what they want with the sympathy of the people.

Besides which, if an atheist or socialist isn't gay, but supports gay rights, by definition that is NOT selfish.

Could the financial support of atheists mean Bell feels obliged to return the favour by eventually abandoning his faith altogether?

Furthermore, the entire point of my post was to show that even though I am a Christian and do not agree with the atheist view of God (which is to say the idea of the absense of God), I STILL support this soldier in their right to attend the ceremony and NOT have to bow their head, and believe that any Christian or other person who would force this soldier to do so by threat of removal from the ceremony, is just plain wrong.

Asking the hard questions and looking for the truth (the truth supported by FACTS, not made up gibberish) is what makes Atheist better than Theists.

If you had a doctorate in any sort of research field you'd know that «there are no atheists in fox holes» is a claim that would need to be supported by, at a very minimum, a properly conducted survey of people who have been in foxholes.

A lot of atheists feel almost assaulted by the the attacks of reason that one must endure to continually support a faith.

Atheists lack faith because they choose to reject the «proof» provided by various religions supporting the existence of a «God.»

============ CONCLUSIONS A. # 1 is an accepted scientific fact, by theists and atheists, importantly: it does not in and of itself describe how we got from initial proto - cell to current complexity B. # 2 has a severe flaw, as phyletic gradualism is dead, and punctuated equilibrium (the fossil record being characterized by new species appearing fully formed) is an accepted fact C. # 3 is the ONLY theory that has support from the fossil record