Sentences with phrase «supported by citations»

Luckily I work at a firm where the partners are receptive to those types of emails and conversations, provided they are respectful, well - reasoned, supported by citations to case law or other applicable rules, and most importantly, provide a solution.

The members of the Accademia della Crusca (academy of bran), which had been founded in Florence in 1584, completed a scholarly manuscript in the first decade of seventeenth century in which they had assembled and organized close to 25,000 alphabetized Tuscan word forms, supported by citations from exemplary authors.

It must be grammatically correct and supported by citations to relevant authorities, and it must have a clear sense of audience and purpose.

Not exact matches

The negative position — to the creatures — is supported by one citation of Aristotle and two of pseudo-Dionysius.

Consider first Ogden's citation of Whitehead's observation that, in support of such an experiential description, «the only mode of decision can be by an appeal to the self - evidence of experience» (PP 87).

It would be possible to support this analysis in some detail by citation of passages from Whitehead that point in this direction.

Declarations by so called «100 Pastors» and citations from Psychological and Psychiatric fraternities that support GLBTQ fornication have done more harm than good.

This statement was not supported by any scientific citations, and our examination of the literature revealed that there may be some confusion as to whether poligeenan is in fact degraded food - grade carrageenan.

We read the medal citations in the papers, but this is the unsanitised version - the reality of crouching in a slit trench under mortar attack, the agonising wait for helicopter support, the heat, the thirst, the dirt, the monotony of ration packs, the fear, the chilling sounds and smell of war.The theme of the book is set by Fergusson's intricate account of the Siege of Now Zad.

[citation needed] In a March 2015 Newsnight election debate, he was challenged by Jeremy Paxman as to whether or not he was «tough enough» to be Prime Minister, famously responding, «Hell yes, I'm tough enough», in reference to his reluctance to support air strikes against extremist targets in Syria.

But as I followed the citation trail and actually started looking at the primary studies that were cited in support of those conclusions — and thinking seriously about the methods that had been employed in the studies, the presuppositions behind them, and whether there were alternative evolutionary hypotheses for the things studied that were not in fact being ruled out by the experiments — I began to find that it wasn't all that convincing.

In a cohort of over 71,000 scientists funded by NIH between 1996 and 2014, we analyzed the associations between grant support and 3 bibliometric outcomes based on the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), namely maximum RCR, median RCR, and annual weighted RCR.

The IAA award citation notes that the VSOP team «realized the long - held dream of radio astronomers to extend those baselines into space, by observing celestial radio sources with the HALCA satellite, supported by a dedicated network of tracking stations, and arrays of ground radio telescopes from around the world.»

Bring up the relationship between iodine and thyroid disorders, and people inevitably put the gloves on and get scrappy — not just an intellectual back and forth banter, supported by exchange of peer - reviewed scientific studies and empirically validated literature — but a throw - down, knock - out fight, where claims are made on the basis of anecdotal evidence based on what so - and - so blogger said, without a single primary or secondary source citation.

This is an evidence based website, so we're very interested in other's assertions as long as they are supported by unbiased published peer - reviewed journal citations, such as this:

Frank, you cherry - pick from my pieces to attack ME, but leave out the many citations I include; so, yes, my claims are supported by evidence.

The case study help provided is of high quality, and non-plagiarized paper supported by impeccable citations and references.

Most papers in science are largely ignored and this is demonstrated by negligible download and citation data, which gives support to the notion that most of science publishing serves a vanity (author) market, rather than a reader market.

The case study help given is of high quality, and non-plagiarized paper supported by flawless citations and references.

I can supply any number of citations to correct your misunderstandings — as to why Marzluff's work does not support TNR at all, why coyotes are better for birds than cats, and much more — but nearly every TNR supporter with whom I've conversed has been too blinded by their emotional attachment to feral cats to accept scientific reality....

-LRB-...) we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

«This is supported by multiple independent studies despite variations in the study timing, definition of consensus, or differences in methodology including surveys of scientists, analyses of literature or of citation networks.»

Using a dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data, Anderegg et al. (2010) found a similar result to Doran and Zimmerman, that between 97 % to 98 % of climate experts support the consensus, and that the average number of publications by the «skeptics» is around half the number by scientists convinced by the evidence of human - caused global warming.

Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

Despite genuine mishandling of scientific data by some climate researchers, some sloppy writing and citations by the IPCC, and the lot of quasi-scandals taking up headlines in the past month, the underlying evidence still wholeheartedly supports that climate change is a major problem.

The articulation of principle is supported by case law citations and will be of practical assistance to judges and counsel.

Sorry, I have no citations to support the first paragraph, but common sense states that the caller is subject to the jurisdiction of the state where he or she is calling from by virtue of the fact that he or she is located in that state.

As has worked in the past, when the neutral citation system for Canadian courts was created and adopted, and equally a uniform naming convention for Canadian judgments, I would suggest the work be entrusted to a core working group supported by an advisory board representative of all the affected communities: the Courts (and the Canadian Judicial Council), the law publishers both print and digital (especially CanLII and Lexum), legal writing and research faculty, law librarians and practising lawyers from both our French and English legal communities.

If the electronic document has been prepared with care, its footnote calls will be linked to the notes, and if citations have been linked to the cited authorities either by the author or, as in the Fifth Circuit, by court software, the path to those authorities will not depend on the citations» sharing the reader's field of vision with the propositions they support.

Also note that, conveniently, many of the citations are to «literature» by the very same authors of this essay, Lamb and Kelly (kind of like supporting one's hypotheses with citations to prior essays making the same hypotheses.)

SCOPUS, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Academic OneFile, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), CNKI, Current Abstracts, Dietrich's Index Philosophicus, EBSCO Academic Search, EBSCO Advanced Placement Source, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO Family & Society Studies Worldwide, EBSCO Family Studies Abstracts, EBSCO Military Transition Support Center, EBSCO Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, EBSCO SocINDEX, EBSCO Sociological Collection, EBSCO Sociology Source Ultimate, EBSCO TOC Premier, Educational Research Abstracts Online (ERA), EMCare, Emerging Sources Citation Index, FRANCIS, Gale, International Bibliography of Book Reviews (IBR), International Bibliography of Periodical Literature (IBZ), OCLC, ProQuest Social Science Collection, ProQuest Sociological Abstracts, PSYCLINE, SCImago, Sociology of Education Abstracts, Special Education Needs Abstracts, Studies on Women & Gender Abstracts, Summon by ProQuest, Vocational Education and Training Abstracts