Some on the Right, including my forum partner Neal McCluskey, argue that a federal scholarship tax credit assumes a federal role in education that is not
supported by the Constitution.
Not exact matches
Some of those involved in the Movement make the formal commitment of Membership, which consists in an agreement to uphold its Aims and Ideals, to abide
by its
Constitution, and to
support its activities through prayer, work and financial assistance.
He wrote in his letter:»... I have deep concerns that the participation
by our Episcopal colleagues in the consecration of Canon Lines, with or without the
support of their respective dioceses, is contrary to the spirit of the canons of the Council of Nicaea and, most importantly, outside of the authority of our National
Constitution.
The church also voted,
by an overwhelming majority, to change the language about marriage in the church
constitution to «two persons» from a «man and a woman,» according to More Light Presbyterians, a group that
supports gay rights.
The republicans (i.e., the reluctant supporters and anti-Federalist opponents of the new
Constitution)
supported a tradition of political thought that wanted to see government «make of its citizens the best people they are capable of becoming,» to inculcate moral virtue as it was defined
by each concrete political community.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound
by Oath or Affirmation, to
support this
Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
Like others who
support the original understanding of the
Constitution, I disagree with many of the Supreme Court's decisions under the establishment clause, but in our system of government a federal - district judge like Judge Jones is bound
by those decisions.
Such freedom was enshrined in the First Amendment to the
Constitution and codified in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act,
supported and signed into law in 1993
by President Bill Clinton.
«We
support the protection of all Americans including the right to the free exercise of religion, as guaranteed
by the
Constitution of the United States.»
An executive order of the President must find
support in the
Constitution, either in a clause granting the President specific power, or
by a delegation of power
by Congress to the President.
«It was one of the first bills I actually voted on when I finally got seated and I found it very ironic here I was in a gerrymandered district that had been drawn
by for Republican Party and here I was voting for this and I stood up and said I don't
support this because it enshrines our gerrymandered districts in the
constitution and it's not an independent panel.»
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the
Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «
support and defend the
Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed
by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees,
by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision
by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
The data (EDIT: Provided
by the OP) also doesn't
support that (EDIT: the OP's assertion that) American's love the
constitution more than other countries because we do not have a similar line for rate at which another country's constitution is googled by their citizens (What's the trend of Canadians googling the Canadian Con
constitution more than other countries because we do not have a similar line for rate at which another country's
constitution is googled by their citizens (What's the trend of Canadians googling the Canadian Con
constitution is googled
by their citizens (What's the trend of Canadians googling the Canadian
ConstitutionConstitution?).
Survation also had a poll out today and found similar levels of
support for some sort of re-arrangement of the
constitution for England: 65 % said that Scottish MPs should
by banned from voting on English laws at Westminster, 59 % would
support an English Parliament.
Mr. Lewis said the awarding of such stipends to vice chairmen was standard practice and
supported by state law and the State
Constitution, offering documentation that showed that Mr. Flanagan had ordered such stipends — first in a 2016 letter — following the lead of Dean G. Skelos, the disgraced former leader of the Senate.
But there are powerful reasons for requiring such
support, such as preventing constitutional provisions that are strongly opposed
by a substantial minority of the country from being enacted, which would undermine the nation's allegiance toward the
Constitution.
Speaking at the unveiling of the statue, located on Obafemi Awolowo Way
by the Lagos Television (LTV) junction in Ikeja, governor Ambode said the party's position, as stipulated in its manifesto, seeks to amend the Nigeria
Constitution with a view to devolving powers to States and local governments in order to entrench true Federalism and the Federal spirit and that the State
supports the restructuring committee of the party going round the country to achieve same.
But the Minority Leader Haruna Iddrisu on Wednesday June 7 on the floor of parliament quoted Standing Order (53)(1d) to
support his claim that the President violated the
constitution by not informing parliament about the trip.
1 A declaration that on a true and proper interpretation of Article 75 of the 1992
Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana,
by agreeing to the transfer of Mahmud Umar Muhammad Bin Atef and Khalid Muhammad Salih Al - Dhuby (both former detainees of Gunatanamo Bay) to the Republic of Ghana, required the ratification
by an Act of Parliament or a resolution of Parliament
supported by the votes of more than one - half of all the members of Parliament.
We came out with the promise that everyone of us will
support and abide
by the provisions of the
constitution, our rules in the national assembly... this is therefore the benefit of the crisis which happened two days ago, if I can call it so.
The two applicants prayed the Supreme Court for «a declaration that on a true and proper interpretation of Article 75 of the 1992
Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana,
by agreeing to the transfer of Bin Atef and Al - Dhuby (both former detainees of the Guantanamo Bay) to the Republic of Ghana, required ratification
by an Act of Parliament or a resolution of Parliament,
supported by the votes of more than one - half of all members of Parliament.»
[15] Since then, the current presidential system has been openly
supported by Justice and Development Party leaders several times, along with a «new
constitution».
Senator Nozzolio says the 63rd district, which is largely configured to
support an additional Republican Senator was determined solely
by grouping together communities of interest and dictated
by a formula in the state's
constitution.
This sort of executive commitment, combined with thoughtful non-partisan preparation
by a
constitution commission, brings greater public
support for convening a convention.
By ruling of the presiding officer, or on motion of any Council member supported by at least one - third of the Council members present and voting, any matter on the agenda that has not yet come to vote, with the exceptions of a proposed amendment to the Constitution or a motion to recall an elective member of the Board, may be submitted to the entire Council membership for a mail ballot, or by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those member
By ruling of the presiding officer, or on motion of any Council member
supported by at least one - third of the Council members present and voting, any matter on the agenda that has not yet come to vote, with the exceptions of a proposed amendment to the Constitution or a motion to recall an elective member of the Board, may be submitted to the entire Council membership for a mail ballot, or by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those member
by at least one - third of the Council members present and voting, any matter on the agenda that has not yet come to vote, with the exceptions of a proposed amendment to the
Constitution or a motion to recall an elective member of the Board, may be submitted to the entire Council membership for a mail ballot, or
by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those member
by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those members.
But the extent to which state
constitutions provide
support for desegregation
by race is unclear.
For instance, Ecuador's 2008
Constitution promotes the idea of universal citizenship, which is
supported by inclusive education policies and regulations for non-citizens.
The proposed state constitutional amendments are backed
by U.S. English, a private organization that
supports the addition of a similar amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
Public education revenue has been insulated from the direct effects of economic ups and downs
by a number of politically constructed conditions, including a privileged legal status in most state
constitutions, multiple state and federal revenue sources, and stable tax
support, such as property taxes, at the local level.
In addition, the challengers say using tax dollars to pay tuition at religious schools is barred
by the
Constitution's prohibition against compelling a person to «
support any place of worship... against his consent,» and its ban on using state funds «for the benefit of any religious or theological institution.»
The brief lays foundational
support for school choice as a viable, effective means for children to receive a quality education and confirms the confusion and harm caused
by Blaine amendments in state
constitutions.
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Members of the Florida
Constitution Revision Commission Education Committee today voted to
support a proposal
by Commission member Erika Donalds to change language in the Florida
Constitution that will authorize the Legislature to enact general laws providing alternative processes to authorize the establishment of charter schools.
A Public School Academy is a state -
supported public school under the State
Constitution, operating under a charter contract issued
by a public authorizing body.
The
constitution passed with a 78 % majority but
support varied widely
by region.
The Council also approved the Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Cooper Union Alumni Association, incorporated under Section 803 of the Not - for - Profit Corporation Law, and revised
by - laws to
support the
Constitution approved
by the Alumni Body in May 2016..
Their human rights must be respected and upheld, as guarantee under the Peruvian Political
Constitution, the precautionary measures granted
by Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on May 5, 2014, the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and as
supported by the latest determination of the International Criminal Court in The Hague to prosecute company executives, politicians and other individuals under international law for crimes linked to land grabbing and environmental destruction.
An amendment to the Oregon
Constitution prohibits judicial review of the amount of punitive damages awarded
by a jury «unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to
support the verdict.»
In affirming, both the State Court of Appeals and the State Supreme Court rejected Honda's argument that the punitive damages award violated due process because it was excessive and because Oregon courts have no power to correct excessive verdicts under a 1910 amendment to the State
Constitution, which prohibits judicial review of the amount of punitive damages awarded
by a jury «unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to
support the verdict.»
Many of those protections were introduced
by the Supreme Court in its more activist days and probably would not find
support in the
constitution if they were re-evaluated as an original matter.
Perhaps surprisingly, the strongest regional
support for the courts having the final say was in Quebec at 68.5 percent -LRB-...) In effect, majority
support for the courts holding sway nationally is delivered
by Quebec, ironically the one province whose legislature has never signed on to the
Constitution Act of 1982».
In
support of his position, the father relied on the «Haudenosaunee right to be subject, [solely] and exclusively, to the family law and child
support and parenting processes under Haudenosaunee law», which relates to the inherent right to self - government recognized and affirmed
by the
Constitution, and that the Haudenosaunee «have not accepted the imposition of Canadian laws that touch on matters central to their society, namely governance and the application of provincial and federal statutory regimes that infringe on their core identity as a people».
«If Congress passes a Human Life Amendment to the
Constitution that would prohibit abortion except when it was necessary to prevent the death of the mother, would you actively
support its ratification
by the Texas Legislature?»
As part of the 2017 - 18 state budget process, the State Bar continues to
support creation of a state - funded system to ensure that indigent criminal defendants receive effective legal representation as required
by the U.S.
Constitution.
According to a poll funded
by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, 74 percent of Oklahoma voters favor choosing appellate judges in contested elections over a merit selection and retention process, and 69 percent
support amending the
constitution to make this change.
Law dictionaries made
by private corporations don't have authority over states or their courts, which ultimately derive their power from their
constitutions and legislation made
by their constitutional legislatures and the people's
support of them.
That surely can refer only to such controversies in which a State can be a part, in respect to which, if any question arises, it can be determined, according to the principles I have
supported, in no other manner than
by a reference either to preexistent laws or laws passed under the
Constitution and in conformity to it.
By analogy, the US oath of allegiance, which requires immigrants (and others) to «
support and defend the
Constitution and the laws of the United States» (with the
Constitution playing the role in the US that the Monarchy does here) does not preclude you from advocating that the
Constitution be changed or reformed, it just mandates that you do so in a manner that is in keeping with the US legal and constitutional order.
It wants to explore substance rather than form; and to avoid, at least for now, such issues as a written
constitution, as
supported by Goldsmith, or a British Bill of rights as conceived
by David Cameron.
If letters and private documents can thus be seized and held and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the
Constitution... The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain conviction
by means of unlawful seizures and enforced confessions, the latter often obtained after subjecting accused persons to unwarranted practices destructive of rights secured
by the Federal
Constitution, should find no sanction in the judgments of the courts which are charged at all times with the
support of the
Constitution and to which people of all conditions have a right to appeal for the maintenance of such fundamental rights.
Suffice to say that the preamble sets out the history preceding enactment, and that enactment of the
Constitution was
supported by «the people» of the colonies.