Sentences with phrase «supported interpretation of it»

Of course, it would still be up to a jury to decide, but based on Apple's proposed and supported interpretation of the law, the judge presiding over a cupholder design patent trial wouldn't have a choice but to instruct the jury that a total, unapportioned disgorgement of profits is possible under the law.

Using this analysis, Justice McLachlin found that neither the words themselves, nor the historical context which gave rise to them supported the interpretation of the majority of the Court.

Heritage Audio SL's position was that His Honour Judge Hacon's judgment was correct and should be followed in light of recent similar decisions of both the CJEU (Nintendo Co. Ltd. v BigBen Interactive GmbH and BigBen Interactive SA (C - 24 / 16 and C - 25 / 16) and of the Federal Court of Justice of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof)(Parfummarken (BGH, I ZR 164/16), both of which supported the interpretation of the provision by Heritage Audio SL.

Prior to the amendments, the jurisprudence of every Human Rights Tribunal and the BFOR Guidelines all supported an interpretation of sections 7 and 10 which included discriminatory effects absent intention as «discriminatory practices» and requiring «reasonable accommodation» of a Respondent before it could avail itself of a section 14 (a) defence.

The man is a Christian apologist, we expect him to write books like that... they support his interpretation of the bible.

Hill has suggested three structural points in Whitehead's philosophy which support this interpretation of divine love.

They particularly support the interpretation of genome sequence data, which has become a powerful tool in many areas of biology and medicine in the last years.

Weronika Sikora - Wohlfeld (Beyer, TUD)-- «Computational tools supporting the interpretation of protein interaction data and functional genomics screens» (2012)

On isolating teacher effects: «Inferring teacher competence from test scores requires the isolation of teaching effects from other major influences on student test performance,» while «the task is to support an interpretation of student test performance as reflecting teacher competence by providing evidence against plausible rival hypotheses or interpretation.»

The near absence of planktic foraminifers in the MIS 6 sediments of these cores (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3) 56 also supports the interpretation of virtually no surface water productivity due to closed sea ice conditions.

In the case of Briffa's actions, when the Review examined the full email exchange they found nothing to support the interpretation of collusion in rejecting contradictory ideas:

Not exact matches

Even a mildly generous interpretation supports that claim — Wolf mentioned Sanders» eyeshadow in passing while criticizing Sanders» job performance, and a comparison of Sanders to a character from The Handmaid's Tale was first and foremost a political rather than personal attack.

Entrepreneurs, after all, must create their own rules and interpretation of what's right and the subsequent supporting environment.

Increasingly, they're playing a role in near real - time interpretation of comments, tips, and other feedback left on Web support forums.

He supports this claim by pointing out how da Vinci's portraits defy facile analysis — how the interpretation of his portraits» moods is wide open to the imagination.

Estonia: the Estonian Tax Authority (Maksu - Tolliamet) published in March 2014 an interpretation of the taxation of bitcoin, ruling that bitcoin was subject to VAT (also supported by the Court of Justice).

The latest results are part of an ongoing drill program that continues to support the interpretation that McVeigh is the fold continuation of the Austin Horizon.

It is the same as a Muslim student here stating that she is Muslim and her Faith guides her and then making the jump that she would support the Taliban's interpretation of Islamic law.

They claim her discoveries support their belief, based on their interpretation of Genesis, that the earth is only a few thousand years old.

And then, most crucially: «But rescuers did differ from others in their interpretation of religious teaching and religious commitment, which emphasized the common humanity of all people and therefore supported efforts to help Jews» (emphasis added).

Mather wrote a huge commentary on the Bible, Biblia Americana, in which he marshaled such patristic writers as Origen, Basil, and Augustine in support of a «spiritual» as well as «literal» interpretation of the first chapter of Genesis.

Yes yes, we all know your interpretation of the bible is equal to whatever might support your proposed non-answer at any given time.

Forms of exegesis or biblical interpretation that do not support the homiletic, evangelical, and educational missions of the Church may have their place in the academy, but they are subsets of religious studies, not theology.

Beyond the obvious fallacies in Genesis, the first book of the Bible, everything else is open to interpretation by those who need it to say whatever they're supporting.

I can no more say this supports a God of Love than a God of Wrath because it depends on one's interpretation.

This interpretation is supported by Ford's terminological suggestions regarding Whitehead's doctrine of supersession.

Given these historical errors and oversights in both our biblical interpretation and our artistic engagement, we must support efforts to study and present a true, uncompromising picture of both the glory of God's creation and the depths of human folly.

However it may be with respect to Aristotle and Kant, I feel fairly confident the genetic analysis I have been describing will support rather than undermine such standard interpretations of Whitehead as those of Ivor Leclerc and William Christian.

1On page 272 of his excellent book, The Nature of Physical Existence (London: George Allen and Unwin; New York: Humanities Press, 1972), Leclerc quotes from Science and the Modern World in support of his interpretation of Whitehead.

We beg to differ, because we believe — and are supported by another history of interpretation — that suggest the grace of God is more dynamic than that.

Simpler interpretations of Isaiah's call are more natural.11 Further reservations appear when we look closely at another item of support for the thesis that the great prophets were merely cult prophets.

The Reformers thought that its message was quite clear and needed little or no interpretation, but the history of Protestantism seems to support the Catholic claim.

But as I've already stated, a knowledge of ancient Middle Eastern culture plus a study of the Hebrew text itself does not support that interpretation.

Instead, it supports an interpretation that God accepted Abel's offering because it was offered properly and from a good heart, whereas God rejected Cain's offering because it was offered improperly from a heart full of jealousy and anger.

Plenty of important biblical texts, especially in the prophetic writings, support such an interpretation.

For example, it is not a sin to have questions about my interpretation of Genesis in light of the science that supports evolution.

Secondly; I will try to support the possibility of a process - theological notion of genuine revelation by pleading for a more fluid interpretation of the relation of metaphysics and theology.

You say the Bible is the «Holy Word Of God» and must be followed for verses / interpretations that support your PERSONAL position on a subject, but IGNORE the Bible when passages do not support your positions, and you have no respect for freedom of and from religion and Separation of Church and StatOf God» and must be followed for verses / interpretations that support your PERSONAL position on a subject, but IGNORE the Bible when passages do not support your positions, and you have no respect for freedom of and from religion and Separation of Church and Statof and from religion and Separation of Church and Statof Church and State.

Kraus supports her view by producing an argument against what she apparently takes to be the only alternative position open to Whiteheadians, the «interpretation of God as a personal order of divine occasions» of Charles Hartshorne (p. 163).

Since a given actual entity is causally affected by every other actual entity In its past, this theory would tend to support my original «detailed» interpretation of CE in IWTP, according to which Whitehead is committed to a theory of perception in the mode of CE which yields very specific knowledge of causes.

A literal interpretation is supported by statements in The Structure of Behavior such as the one in which things are described as «dynamically knowing» each other (SB 143).

Mays's discussion leans heavily on the chapter concerning abstraction (SMW, chapter 10), for Whitehead's discussion there of the realm of eternal objects tends to lend support to Mays's interpretation.

He certainly has a right to say that and he has his own interpretation of the facts to support it.

However — and this is well worth noting — the Bible, without adding more internal contradiction than is already present in its pages, will also support common sense interpretations of its texts and theologies.

You want to demonstrate «your» truth by signs and works that you have been part of and experienced but show no scriptural support or choose to apply scripture as your own private interpretation!

Differences are based on sustained and supported differences of interpretation between faithful and sincere members of the Body — and not just of individuals, but of whole congregations or denominations.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

He concludes that more attention to the Bible did not necessarily mean more virtuous action; that personal engagement with the Bible did result in self - sacrificing service, but also in divisive hubris, mistaken interpretations (such as the identification of America with ancient Israel), and blindness to social evils; and that Protestant spiritual individualism undercut corrupt hierarchies and supported democracy, but also promoted political excesses and violent anti-Catholicism.

It is their new vitality and popular support in the country of Gandhi and Nehru that needs interpretation.

It is true that one can find among individual theologians support for an «inerrancy» position throughout the history of the church, but it is also true that these same theologians often exercise in their exegesis much greater freedom than Lindsell's or Schaeffer's interpretation of their theory would seem to allow.