«What they (the Democrats & warmists) are so afraid of is this: Trump is the first Republican Presidential nominee that has ever staked out a strongly science
supported skeptical position not only on climate science claims, but also on the so - called «solutions».
In the final chapter «On The Way Forward», Morano writes climate sanity was restored to the United States with Trump's election, and that Trump is: «The warmists» worst nightmare: the first Republican presidential nominee who ever staked out a strongly science -
supported skeptical position not only on climate change claims but also on the socalled «solutions».»
Considering there were 500 papers
supporting a skeptical position on global warming alarm published in scientific journals during 2016, perhaps the publication of wake - up - call, borderline - iconoclastic scientific papers such as this will become more and more commonplace in the near future.
485 Scientific Papers Published In 2017
Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm.
You wrote that I misrepresented the 500 papers that
support a skeptical position on climate alarm for 2016 and 2017, and you said you established that by reading the «first few» papers and identifying misrepresentations.
Not exact matches
The Journal of the American Statistical Association still publishes good papers
supporting a
skeptical / lukewarmist
position (as does the AAAS's Science Magazine), but I expect that the board of the ASA has just raised the bar for accepting studies not supportive of the consensus.
More specifically, the papers in this compilation
support these four main
skeptical positions — categorized here as N (1)-- N (4)-- which question climate alarm.
Joel Shore is always trying to re-frame the
skeptical position, which in general is that there may be some harmless, beneficial and minor warming due to AGW, but that there is no evidence whatever
supporting his belief in catastrophic AGW.
You
support the IPCC
position that this is strongly positive, based on maintaining essentially constant RH with warming, while I am more
skeptical of this claim on a long - term basis.