Suppose one who isn't religious is presented by «Pro-God» proponents with
their supporting arguments from ancient / modern traditional religious intellects.
You have to defend your position using
supporting arguments from reliable secondary publications.
Not exact matches
The commonplace
argument that increases in the volume of immigration, by themselves, lower wages and take jobs
from Americans - an
argument which Attorney General Jeff Sessions used to defend ending DACA - has neither empirical nor theoretical
support in economics.
The crux of BAML's
argument is that the Treasury market has received major
support from foreign investors over the past 20 years, and any threat to that backstop could have a destabilizing effect.
The Internet Association, a D.C. - based tech lobbying group representing industry titans like Google, Amazon, and Twitter, will be filing legal
arguments as an intervening party in
support of the legal push to restore net neutrality, according to a report
from Recode's Tony Romm.
(disclosure — I teach these courses in my school and the students are required to research and ID empirical data
from OECD, IMF, Bloomberg, Capital IQ etc. to
support their
arguments).
In further
support of Stephen's
arguments,
from Statistics Canada, John Baldwin and Ryan Macdonald, The Canadian Manufacturing Sector: Adapting to Challenges, 2009
The empirical literature I've seen certainly
supports his
argument — most corporate investment is financed
from retained earnings, which -LSB-...]
Interesting changes though — Just before the Federal Circuit oral
arguments in this case, the PTO Solicitor withdrew its
support from the PTAB's original decision and provided notice that the PTO is actively reconsidering its approach to claim construction and indefiniteness.
The
argument from people in
support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining.
The
argument from Gavin and other who
supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed).
Wow — I can't believe you actually used a tweet
from me during the NHL playoffs to
support your
argument!
Those who are convinced that some mechanism makes historically reliable valuation measures wholly irrelevant are perfectly welcome to speculate as they wish, but aside
from indignant verbal
arguments, we see no rigorous analysis to
support that belief.
She relied on expert evidence
from Muse Stancil and the Conference Board to
support her
arguments in favor of Canada - wide economic benefits.
The movement's website features personal stories of women who are usually the only head coverers in their churches, as well as
arguments from scripture to
support the practice.
The last childlike
argument from someone with no valid position or evidencial
support.
Kaine started out with a version of the «personally opposed but publically
supporting»
argument based on the specious claim that the First Amendment of the Constitution prevents us
from imposing our religious «values» on public life.
Countering these
arguments, Andrew Cuomo has cobbled together a coalition to
support his amendment, the most vocal of which have been the business leaders who stand to profit
from casinos and public sector workers, primarily teacher's unions, who will be the beneficiary of increased state revenues.
Tenderness separated
from the source of tenderness thus
supports a «popular piety» that goes unexamined, a piety in which liberalism in its decline establishes dogmatic rights, rights that in an extreme» as presently in the
arguments for abortion in the political sphere and for «popular culture» in the academic» become absolute dogma to be accepted and not examined.
To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization
from features found in human experience is not sufficient to justify the claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical
argument rather than intuition or generalization is necessary to
support the claim that experience is essentially temporal.
Therefore, the statement «even the demons believe, and tremble» is NOT
from James, and is NOT in
support of his
argument, but is
from someone who does not like what James is saying, and is objecting to the point James is making.
On the one hand, his analysis
supports the kinds of
arguments that suggest part of the disparity of pay between men and women stems
from the choices they make in relation to who they are as men and women.
Supporting Sharia law is the same
argument the catholic church is making, just
from a different cult.
The Founders» Constitution is, in the editors» words, «an anthology of reasons and of the political
arguments that thoughtful men and women drew
from, and used to
support those reasons» (I: xi) The «reasons» and «
arguments» are those of the founding generation and of the works that the» founders read.
Many of its
arguments to this effect are derived
from human rights «data,» which the Administration has used in turn to justify its
support for the contra rebels... [W] e find the Administration's approach to Nicaragua deceptive and harmful....
Built right into the religion of Christianity is the insane capability for an individual to take any side of any
argument and
support it with some
from their precious Bible.
Name - dropping may not always be the most convincing
argument, yet one has to show respect for any movement that can draw to itself
support from such notables as Marshall McLuhan, Buckminster Fuller and Major General Franklin Davis, former commandant of the United States War College.
Furthermore, for someone who claims to
support «biblical manhood» and «biblical womanhood,» Wilson's
argument has no
support from scripture whatsoever.
Even if we were to grant (for the sake of
argument only) that God could or would intervene in this way in earthly affairs, God's resurrection of this one person can not logically
support the likelihood of salvation for the rest of us: (A) It can not prove that God is able to save us
from death and grant us eternal life; (B) it can not guarantee that God is interested in doing this; and (C) it does not even show that God will forgive our sins.
They lack, so the
argument goes, the necessary
support from their constituents to be effective leaders.
According to logician Trudy Govier, «The fallacy of equivocation is committed when a key word in an
argument is used in two or more senses and the premises of the
argument appear to
support its conclusion only because these senses are not distinguished
from each other.»
That intelligent people get converted
from time to time is certainly not a proof that what they now believe is true, and I don't get the sense that he's using the intelligence of these people as rhetorical weight to
support an
argument about the truth of what he believes to be true.
It follows
from this that to
support the rightfulness of euthanasia with a number of essentially different
arguments is to put oneself in the wrong
from the outset by admitting indirectly that no single absolutely cogent
argument exists.
Earlier writers had recognized that Volkmar went too far in his attempted demonstration of Mark's dependence upon Paul — he found evidence of such dependence on almost every page of the Gospel — but his view was such a welcome relief
from the one - sided Tübingen theory, according to which Mark was a «neutral» in the great apostolic controversy over Jewish Christianity, that the main thesis of Volkmar was accepted without careful scrutiny of his
supporting arguments.
Religion does not
support or encourage critical thinking or individual thinking, which is why you get the same
arguments from the believers.
These assertions often do not differ markedly
from the kinds of theoretical and explanatory
arguments prevalent in the social science literature, but they serve as rhetorical appeals aimed at shaping the way we think about our world, the ways we vote, and the policies we
support.
Being present for so many conversations has gradually given me the tools to sift
arguments, sort the wheat
from the chaff, consider the weaknesses in other worldviews and determine what seem to be the most significant
arguments in
support of Christianity.
The Israeli Labor Party, which governed Israel
from its beginning as a state in 1946 until Prime Minister Menachem Begin took power in June, had avoided cultivating the kind of American evangelical
support expressed in the recent newspaper ads because it knew that to engage in religious
arguments over national boundaries would be self - defeating.
Madison's words were taken
from a lengthy
argument against a specific bill in Virginia's legislature which would have levied a tax in order to financially
support the teaching of Christianity, and he argued against such a tax on the grounds that past legal
support of Christianity had led to its corruption.»
You can't prove difinitively using scientific method where life came
from and yet you (not necessarily YOU, but others on this blog who
support your
argument) call me arrogant or moronic because I point to a creator, which I can not prove scientifically either.
Why doesn't she
support her
argument with quotes
from the bible?
im always amazed when people who think they have a serious point and wish to put forth an
argument in
support, quote
from the bible.
«There's widespread
support in the industry for the rebate to be removed
from NZ producers, but every time we raise this with decision makers in Canberra we run up against the
argument of whether removing that entitlement will have broader ramifications on our trading agreements, not just with New Zealand but with other countries as well.
Counsel - When you write something as a post you will find THE PACK ready to pounce and rip apart anyone who writes an article such as yours.Defend Wenger if you must (and god knows he could do with some
support from somewhere) but you are a feeding frenzy for THE PACK (which includes me by the way) by writing as you have.Try putting some
argument or reasoning to your Post next time.
Not sure how that
supports your
argument, unless you're trying to imply that Blake Griffin and Reggie Bullock are downgrades
from Tobias Harris and Avery Bradley.
«The much - touted «biblical
argument» in
support of corporal punishment is founded upon proof - texting a few isolated passages
from Proverbs.
From the theoretical perspective that gravitates to best practices, weakness in the muscles
supporting the head is a primary
argument against youth heading.
The increased socioeconomic inequalities in breastfeeding observed in the intervention group
supports the
argument that population intervention strategies could inadvertently exacerbate, rather than mitigate, socioeconomic inequalities, particularly when the intervention aims to change individual behaviours rather than targeting «upstream» structural changes.25 Our results are also compatible with an observational study
from Brazil reporting that breastfeeding rates increased first among the socioeconomically better - off, followed by increases among the poor, over a 20 - year period of active breastfeeding promotion campaigns in Brazil.26
I don't think it lends
support to the
argument for AP, it seems obvious that you shouldn't abuse or neglect your children or deprive them
from human contact, so what's the point of including it?
Therefore, conceptually, if two people already - as universally
supported - don't necessarily have the same voting weight (you can have a vote taken away
from you for presumably doing wrong to society), what is the moral / philosophical
argument against having select people being given additional votes for presumably doing more than average for society?