However, during her 2008 presidential run, Clinton flip - flopped and began
supporting ethanol mandates — quite possibly in an attempt to curry favor with Iowans.
Not exact matches
Obama has, however, also been a supporter of
ethanol made primarily from corn — a prominent industry in his home state of Illinois — and recently told farmers he
supports federal
mandates to make nine billion gallons (34 billion liters) of
ethanol to use as fuel this year.
Over the past few years the EPA has been lobbied by a diverse assortment of industry groups to repeal the
ethanol mandate, and policymakers have
supported that with introduction of legislation.
The circle goes like this: Tax dollars and
mandates create and
support an
ethanol industry.
Some green activists
supported mandates for biofuel, hoping they would pave the way for next - generation
ethanol, which would use non-food plants.
Reform legislation in the U.S. by environmental - leaning Democrats — New Mexico's Tom Udall and Vermont's Peter Welch — is now gathering
support in both houses of Congress, aided by an environmental lobby determined to end subsidies to
ethanol as well as its
mandated use.
Dennis Avery crows that even the environmental movement is seeking his
support for ending
ethanol mandates.
Support for the
ethanol industry, which blossomed because of a system of tax breaks followed by the fuel
mandate, has long been bipartisan, and the current debate is split more along regional than partisan lines.
Unfortunately, this doesn't stop RFA from cherry - picking data to create «facts» that
support ever - increasing use of
ethanol despite real data that strongly argues the
ethanol mandates under the Renewable Fuel Standard could negatively impact consumers and the broader economy.