Sentences with phrase «supporting facts and evidence»

Students formulated their own opinions about these topics, then wrote op - ed pieces with supporting facts and evidence.

«These two attack dogs [Koku Anyidoho and Kofi Adams] engaging in the monotonous acts of character assassination to avoid the real issue, deliberately repeated similar unfounded accusations against me that I had creditably refuted with supporting facts and evidence, which the very media carrying the recycled accusations had published in previous years.

Preparation truth and proof truths are an arsenal of supporting facts and evidences that help persuade a person to believe in Jesus for eternal life.

Not exact matches

All that, plus they want to hide fact that all the premises of their religion around the divinity of Christ and the supposed benevolent nature of their rather horrid BOMITS and so on have zero support in evidence, and their bizarro ceremonies and smokescreens don't fool people quite as well as they did in pre-internet times.

Case in point: They believe in ID despite the fact that not one, single piece of evidence has been found in support of it, and not one single experiment has provided any proof for it.

Believers seem to think that these things are welcome (or perhaps they just don't care if they're not welcome) and at the same time they think that their religion should never be criticized, despite the fact that their isn't a single shred of evidence to support the existence of any god.

In any case, worry less about who people are and more about the fact that all you have are a lot of personal feelings and beliefs you can't support with objective evidence.

So basically, you heard a story you liked and decided to believe that story, regardless of the fact that no evidence actually supports that story.

The fact that someone can be a brilliant scientist and believe in God is not evidence science supports the existence of God.

In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any objective evidence.

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

You have no evidence to support you, but your unmatched ability to ignore inconvenient facts and bury your head allows you to maintain this silly mythology into the 21st Century.

Which facts do you disagree with, what evidence do you have to support your contentions and where did I claim to be superior to anyone?

Obviously this process of descent has not been observed, but there exists so much overwhelming evidence supporting it that most scientists (and probably all scientists in the life sciences) consider it a fact as well.

But, to deny a scientific fact which has been supported by just as much evidence and data as gravity or the germ theory is plain ignorance.

All Nye is saying is, the future successful development of America and the world depends on people who understand the distinction, and who can relate to and interact with the natural world scientifically and objectively, without being constrained by belief in the creation story or any other explanation of the world not supported by facts and evidence.

Second, your account of Noah is just a straw - man attack, and in fact Canada.com published an article regarding evidence to support a global flood that was revealed in Canada.

To do that we have to establish a way to prove an assumption by: 1) asserting a hypothesis and its components 2) testing the components for substantial supporting evidence, unsupported components go back to be refined 3) either agree after successful testing that in our shared reality the hypothesis is now supported, or that overall unsupported components may mean the hypothesis fails 4) for sake of ease many people call these tested and supported hypotheses «facts», but again that's just so that we can get on with progress.

Things which are supported by fact and evidence.

It is based on the total lack of evidence supporting religious claims and the universal fact that everything ever examined operates according to natural laws.

In fact, there's absolutely no more evidence to suggest that the story is true than there is in support of any of the Arab world's conspiracy theories and tall tales about Jews.

You have absolutely NO evidence the gospels are the truth... none... zero... we have proven in couldnt be true via evidenced links to support our FACTS but you have only belief from a a pedagogy passed down from generation to generation regarded as the trutth and believed by MILLIONS without EVER checking out the EVIDENCE that says it CAN NOT evidence the gospels are the truth... none... zero... we have proven in couldnt be true via evidenced links to support our FACTS but you have only belief from a a pedagogy passed down from generation to generation regarded as the trutth and believed by MILLIONS without EVER checking out the EVIDENCE that says it CAN NOT EVIDENCE that says it CAN NOT be true.

Yeah, but they are biased in that they seek to prove everything through the lens of evolution so they often look in the wrong direction, and a large number of scientists are in fact Christians My point is this, if you take the time to look for the evidence and be open to it, you will find that there is a respectable amount of evidence to support the fact that there is a god and that he is the God of Christianity

What we do believe in is that knowledge and facts need to be supported by evidence and that if new information comes forward that challenges commonly held beliefs, then you need to revise your theories and in some cases throw out the old ones.

Newman saw knowledge as we do: not as «self «evidence» or proven fact but in contrast to «opinion»» what can be supported with widely visible evidence and widely effective arguments.

For those of you saying that atheism isn't a faith, because it is proved by many scientific facts and evidence, try asking a religious person if their faith is supported by facts and evidence as well.

They, the believers, have made up their minds and that is that, regardless of the fact that there never has been one shred of evidence to support the existence of a creator.

In other words, the fact that we don't know how the universe formed or how life first began is * not * evidence supporting an intelligent designer, just as not understanding electricity and lightening 1000 years ago was not evidence for an intelligent designer.

In fact the evidence supporting evolution does contradict the special creation, the coexistence of all «kinds» together and their destruction in a single (mythical) global flood.

Take the money away from the public schools where children will be taught real science and that a «theory» is very close to a proven fact because it is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.

If the goal of sharing good news is to persuade people, you pick and choose the evidence and facts that best support the news.

When you share good news with someone, you not only share the good news, but you also provide supporting evidences and facts which prove the good news you are sharing.

While this is presently a very popular topic and there is a body of evidence looking at extracts of the avocado seed, the fact is there is not enough research to support consuming an avocado seed.

The OB / GYN and CNM's in America are overburdened by patient loads, (According to Amnesty International there are 9.6 OB / GYN's and 0.4 CNM's available per every 1,000 births) having better trained CPM's seems like a nice solution for that problem, in fact why not have them work collaboratively with OB / GYN's, maybe we can all work together to find a common ground where evidenced based practice take place in the hospital to support physiologic birth, since the lack of such practice is what turns many women away looking for alternative choices.

In fact, I vehemently wish more paediatric nurses would undertake the qualification, since paediatrics is the one area where the Baby Friendly Initiative staff training has not been universally embedded, and some skilled, evidence based support is sorely needed.

The phrase «starting to see some evidence» implies that the truth of the hypothesis is in fact a foregone conclusion, and it's just a matter of time before we find real evidence that supports its.

Sicherer and the rest of the team came together because they challenged the fact that there was no significant evidence supporting the idea that children who waited until an appropriate age to try peanut products, would not obtain the allergy.

In some cases, these allegations are backed by facts or evidence, and family courts should consider them when making important custody and support decisions.

There is overwhelming evidence to support the fact that a well equipped, prepared and baby proofed home can avoid a plethora of life threatening situations for your child.

Other evidence supports the fact that LBW infants who are fed their mother's milk, compared to those fed bovine - based formula, have better short - term visual and developmental outcomes, although variables such as daily intake and duration of breastfeeding should also be considered.

At the same time, more evidence now exists to support the fact that breastfeeding is a key intervention for infant and maternal health and survival, both in the short - term and long - term (including non-communicable diseases / NCDs).

A list of the questions asked by the jury to the judge includes one example in which they asked if a juror can «come to a verdict based on a reason that was not presented in court and has no facts or evidence to support it».

Making reference to the Courts Act of 1993 (Act 459), Mr Justice Ofoe said Section 31 (2) holds that «an appellate court, on hearing an appeal in a criminal case, shall allow the appeal if the appellate court considers (a) that the verdict or conviction or acquittal ought to be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable or can not be supported having regard to the evidence, or (b) that the judgement in question ought to be set aside as a wrong decision on a question of law or fact, or (c) that there was a miscarriage of justice, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.»

«The Francis report emphasised the importance of staffing levels in its investigation into the Mid Staffordshire scandal and there is strong evidence to support the fact that minimum nurse staffing levels improve patient outcomes.

«While the allegations are serious, and indicate potential grave misconduct, there is as yet no information or evidence to support them and the fact that the maker of the allegations is unwilling to talk to anyone in a position to investigate them means that their credibility can not properly be assessed at this stage,» IPCC chair Deborah Glass said.

While specific Al - Quaeda connections are subject to debate and uncertainty - but see here for more evidence -, the fact that Saddam supported Islamist terrorism is indisputable (Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Abu Nidal, Fatah's military wing, and many others).

This is regardless of the fact that Mr. Ayariga and his other colleagues who made the allegation, failed to provide any hardcore evidence to support their claims.

«Given the overwhelming evidence that Exxon Mobil knew the facts about climate change but chose to mislead the public and their investors through a massive campaign of climate denial, we strongly support NYS lawmakers taking action to hold them accountable, «Lipton said.

«While the allegations are disturbing, it was determined following a review of the case that the facts and the evidence aren't legally sufficient to support the felony charges,» said Helen Peterson, a spokeswoman for the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office.

The story is deeply researched and fact - checked, and is just the sort of evidence - based journalism we think helps support informed, thoughtful policy debate.