The strong association between the quality of the child's relationship with each parent is also illustrated by Figure 3 - C, which plots average
supportiveness in father - child relationships according to average
supportiveness in mother - child relationships.
As before,
supportiveness in father - child relationships is banded into three groups: poor, good and excellent.
Trainees who are rated A * for
their supportiveness in the Legal Cheek Trainee and Junior Lawyer Survey 2017 - 18 are «very friendly and will step in to help [each other] out if you are very busy», while partners have «a genuine open door policy».
Woodard said there was no arguing about Cornwell's
supportiveness in the other direction, though.
Not exact matches
Supportiveness of church for parent
in trying to raise teen (very supportive) 11.
But
in interactions before and after this high - stakes laugh - off, the film depicts an uneasy blend of
supportiveness and competition, with each of Nina's peers understanding the zero - sum game despite the friendly banter.
Gurit Birnbaum presented research on how a partner's responsiveness (
in other words, their emotional availability and
supportiveness) influences a person's desire for sex with them during a first impression, and how this differs based on attachment style and gender.
Academic self - efficacy, school climate /
supportiveness, school belonging, future goals and ambitions, motivation
in school, victimization (bullying), school self - concept, classroom autonomy, school liking, personal power, parental help, parent support
The correlation between school belonging and school
supportiveness -LRB-.59) was significantly higher than any other
in this domain.
IARR and its predecessors have a tradition of hosting warm, welcoming, and engaging conferences that invite the exchange of fascinating ideas
in an atmosphere of openness and
supportiveness.
In order to investigate whether non-biological resident father figures» supportiveness increases with more time spent in the family, we subdivided families according to whether the father figure had been living in the family prior to the age 10 interview («established» father figure, n = 110) or whether he was recorded as a new household member at this time («recent» father figure, n = 72
In order to investigate whether non-biological resident father figures»
supportiveness increases with more time spent
in the family, we subdivided families according to whether the father figure had been living in the family prior to the age 10 interview («established» father figure, n = 110) or whether he was recorded as a new household member at this time («recent» father figure, n = 72
in the family, we subdivided families according to whether the father figure had been living
in the family prior to the age 10 interview («established» father figure, n = 110) or whether he was recorded as a new household member at this time («recent» father figure, n = 72
in the family prior to the age 10 interview («established» father figure, n = 110) or whether he was recorded as a new household member at this time («recent» father figure, n = 72).
Most ten year - olds are very positive about their father's
supportiveness, with 84 % of father - child relationships being classified as «good» or «excellent»
in terms of children's perceptions of fathers»
supportiveness
Associations between parental
supportiveness and child wellbeing are similar
in strength for father - and mother - child relationships, and are equally important for boys and girls.
Supportiveness was measured using nine items from the trust and communication subscales of the People
in My Life (PIML) scale, a self - report measure of child attachment designed and validated for use
in middle childhood (6 - 12 years)(Ridenour, Greenberg & Cook, 2006) The validation process used a sample of 10 - 12 year olds to establish that the overall PIML attachment scale was correlated as expected with other measures of children's behavioural and emotional adjustment, as reported by parents, teachers and children themselves.
Children's responses were used to categorise father - child relationships as poor, good or excellent according to levels of trust
in, and communication with, fathers (emotional «
supportiveness»).
The section also investigates the extent to which fathers»
supportiveness goes hand -
in - hand with mothers»
supportiveness.
In our study, the gap in perceived supportiveness from fathers and mothers was widest for families with a father figur
In our study, the gap
in perceived supportiveness from fathers and mothers was widest for families with a father figur
in perceived
supportiveness from fathers and mothers was widest for families with a father figure.
Overall, 59 % of father - child relationships are classified as «good» and 25 % as «excellent», leaving 16 % that are «poor»
in terms of
supportiveness.
This gender difference is reflected
in other aspects of children's wellbeing: boys also perceive lower
supportiveness from mothers, have higher levels of behavioural and emotional problems, and report lower wellbeing on other measures used
in this study.
In families with a non-biological resident father figure, the finding that a relatively high proportion of children perceive poor levels of supportiveness suggests that men who find themselves in the position of being a father figure may have particular difficulties in defining their role, both within the family and in relation to the child's non-resident biological fathe
In families with a non-biological resident father figure, the finding that a relatively high proportion of children perceive poor levels of
supportiveness suggests that men who find themselves
in the position of being a father figure may have particular difficulties in defining their role, both within the family and in relation to the child's non-resident biological fathe
in the position of being a father figure may have particular difficulties
in defining their role, both within the family and in relation to the child's non-resident biological fathe
in defining their role, both within the family and
in relation to the child's non-resident biological fathe
in relation to the child's non-resident biological father.
As outlined
in the previous section, a substantial minority (16 %) of ten year - old children
in GUS couple families perceive low levels of
supportiveness from fathers, and are categorised as having a «poor» father - child relationship.
Most ten - year olds
in couple families are positive about resident fathers»
supportiveness.
Conflict behaviors were defined as follows: (a) conflict, the level of tension, hostility, dissension, antagonism, or negative affect; (b) defensiveness, trying to avoid blame or responsibility; (c) contempt, lack of respect, insult, mockery, sarcasm, or derision of partner; (d) withdrawal, an avoidance of the interaction or of the problem discussion
in some way; (e) demand, hounding or nagging partner; (f) communication skills, level of appropriate and positive expressive skills; (g) support - validation, appropriate and positive listening and speaking skills that convey
supportiveness or understanding; (h) problem solving, the ability to constructively define a problem and work toward a mutually satisfactory solution; and (i) humor, trying to make a joke, finding something funny about the situation.
Bolstering attachment security
in romantic relationships: The long - term contribution of partner's sensitivity, expressiveness, and
supportiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
For example, although people may be more inclined to perceive that their social relationships are more supportive
in general, within - person differences
in perceived
supportiveness across relationships should simultaneously exist due to the unique dyadic system of each type of relationship.
Particularly, (1) we expected a positive association between the owners»
supportiveness and warmth and the dogs» proximity seeking with the owner, since a supportive and warm parenting style has been associated with more secure attachment
in children; (2) we expected a positive association between the owners» warmth and the dogs» willingness to approach the experimenter
in a friendly manner, based on the facilitating effect of warm parenting on the children's positive interactions with peers; and (3) we expected a positive association between the owners» level of control and higher aggression
in the dogs, as a possible analogy of the effect of an authoritarian and harsh parenting on relational aggression
in children (Kawabata et al., 2011).