Sentences with phrase «supportiveness no»

Particularly, (1) we expected a positive association between the owners» supportiveness and warmth and the dogs» proximity seeking with the owner, since a supportive and warm parenting style has been associated with more secure attachment in children; (2) we expected a positive association between the owners» warmth and the dogs» willingness to approach the experimenter in a friendly manner, based on the facilitating effect of warm parenting on the children's positive interactions with peers; and (3) we expected a positive association between the owners» level of control and higher aggression in the dogs, as a possible analogy of the effect of an authoritarian and harsh parenting on relational aggression in children (Kawabata et al., 2011).

Parent emotion socialization and children's socioemotional adjustment: when is supportiveness no longer supportive?.

Results showed that work - family conflict resulting from husbands» and wives» employment is related positively to the psychological distress of each, and that psychological distress affects marital outcomes both directly and indirectly through its association with greater marital hostility and less marital warmth and supportiveness.

However, there were no significant effects on negative classroom climate and classroom supportiveness.

For example, although people may be more inclined to perceive that their social relationships are more supportive in general, within - person differences in perceived supportiveness across relationships should simultaneously exist due to the unique dyadic system of each type of relationship.

Bolstering attachment security in romantic relationships: The long - term contribution of partner's sensitivity, expressiveness, and supportiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).

Conflict behaviors were defined as follows: (a) conflict, the level of tension, hostility, dissension, antagonism, or negative affect; (b) defensiveness, trying to avoid blame or responsibility; (c) contempt, lack of respect, insult, mockery, sarcasm, or derision of partner; (d) withdrawal, an avoidance of the interaction or of the problem discussion in some way; (e) demand, hounding or nagging partner; (f) communication skills, level of appropriate and positive expressive skills; (g) support - validation, appropriate and positive listening and speaking skills that convey supportiveness or understanding; (h) problem solving, the ability to constructively define a problem and work toward a mutually satisfactory solution; and (i) humor, trying to make a joke, finding something funny about the situation.

Parenting measures included the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME), which includes assessments of parental supportiveness, parent detachment, reading with children, and physical punishment.

This Figure does, however, also show that there were some children who had a good or excellent relationship with one parent (scoring 3 or more on the supportiveness scale), but a poor relationship with the other parent (scoring under 3 on supportiveness).

GUS did not collect information from fathers on supportiveness.

Most ten - year olds in couple families are positive about resident fathers» supportiveness.

As outlined in the previous section, a substantial minority (16 %) of ten year - old children in GUS couple families perceive low levels of supportiveness from fathers, and are categorised as having a «poor» father - child relationship.

Fathers» supportiveness shows a strong positive association with mothers» supportiveness.

However, a substantial minority (16 %) perceive poor relationships characterised by low supportiveness.

An additional 15 % perceive poor levels of supportiveness from only one parent, however this is more likely to be with the father (11 %) than with the mother (3 %).

Other factors, such as the presence of a father figure rather than the biological father, partner supportiveness and family climate, seem to affect father - child relationships more than mother - child relationships.

Average relationship supportiveness scores for each parent show a strong positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.68, p < 0.001).

Two sections of the report explore which circumstances may lead to poor father - child relationships (low levels of perceived fathers» supportiveness).

The strong association between the quality of the child's relationship with each parent is also illustrated by Figure 3 - C, which plots average supportiveness in father - child relationships according to average supportiveness in mother - child relationships.

Similar information was collected about mothers» supportiveness.

This section considers the overall distribution of poor, good and excellent father - child relationships, based on ten year - old children's perceptions of fathers» supportiveness.

In families with a non-biological resident father figure, the finding that a relatively high proportion of children perceive poor levels of supportiveness suggests that men who find themselves in the position of being a father figure may have particular difficulties in defining their role, both within the family and in relation to the child's non-resident biological father.

This gender difference is reflected in other aspects of children's wellbeing: boys also perceive lower supportiveness from mothers, have higher levels of behavioural and emotional problems, and report lower wellbeing on other measures used in this study.

As before, supportiveness in father - child relationships is banded into three groups: poor, good and excellent.

Boys report slightly lower supportiveness from fathers than girls.

Asterisks indicate statistically significant association between partner supportiveness and poor father - child relationship,

They rely on children's perceptions of fathers» supportiveness.

Overall, 59 % of father - child relationships are classified as «good» and 25 % as «excellent», leaving 16 % that are «poor» in terms of supportiveness.

In our study, the gap in perceived supportiveness from fathers and mothers was widest for families with a father figure.

Our study finds that father supportiveness is positively associated with the child's perceptions of being supported by the mother, and with other aspects of children's socio - emotional wellbeing at the same age.

The section also investigates the extent to which fathers» supportiveness goes hand - in - hand with mothers» supportiveness.

They indicate that fathers» supportiveness is closely associated with several other aspects of ten year - old children's socio - emotional wellbeing that extend outside family life to include enjoyment of school, and relations with teachers and peers.

The gap between children's perceptions of mothers» and fathers» supportiveness is therefore wider for families with a non-biological father than for families with both biological parents.

Average relationship supportiveness scores are slightly lower for father - child relationships than for mother - child relationships [4].

Boys report slightly lower supportiveness from fathers than do girls.

Findings suggest that fathers make an independent contribution to children's wellbeing, even after taking account of mothers» supportiveness and other family circumstances.

It is important to emphasise that the terms «poor», «good» or «excellent» relationships are used throughout the report as shorthand terms for «poor», «good» or «excellent» emotional supportiveness, as viewed by children.

Still other work suggests that the relationship between Facebook use and well - being may be more nuanced and potentially influenced by multiple factors including number of Facebook friends, perceived supportiveness of one's online network, depressive symptomatology, loneliness, and self - esteem [9], [10], [11].

Children's responses were used to categorise father - child relationships as poor, good or excellent according to levels of trust in, and communication with, fathers (emotional «supportiveness»).

Supportiveness was measured using nine items from the trust and communication subscales of the People in My Life (PIML) scale, a self - report measure of child attachment designed and validated for use in middle childhood (6 - 12 years)(Ridenour, Greenberg & Cook, 2006) The validation process used a sample of 10 - 12 year olds to establish that the overall PIML attachment scale was correlated as expected with other measures of children's behavioural and emotional adjustment, as reported by parents, teachers and children themselves.

A second limitation is that parental supportiveness and other aspects of wellbeing were all measured at the same time point, so we can not be sure of the direction of any effect.

Although fathers» supportiveness is generally at lower levels than mothers», relations with both parents appear equally important for ten year - olds» school adjustment, relations with peers and overall wellbeing.

However, the child's physical health (according to body mass index measures and parent reported general health) was not associated with fathers» supportiveness.

Associations between parental supportiveness and child wellbeing are similar in strength for father - and mother - child relationships, and are equally important for boys and girls.

Boys and girls are examined separately, to see whether fathers» supportiveness varies according to child gender.

Our findings do not point to different roles for fathers and mothers, or to different effects of fathers» and mothers» supportiveness for sons» and daughters» wellbeing.

Children with a father figure report lower supportiveness than those with a resident biological father

Most ten year - olds are very positive about their father's supportiveness, with 84 % of father - child relationships being classified as «good» or «excellent» in terms of children's perceptions of fathers» supportiveness

In order to investigate whether non-biological resident father figures» supportiveness increases with more time spent in the family, we subdivided families according to whether the father figure had been living in the family prior to the age 10 interview («established» father figure, n = 110) or whether he was recorded as a new household member at this time («recent» father figure, n = 72).

While the majority of children perceive high levels of supportiveness from resident fathers, a significant minority perceiving low levels of supportiveness also have lower overall wellbeing, regardless of other family circumstances.