@JamesK Donations would sometimes be made directly to a public school or more often to a 501 (c)(3) foundation that
supports a public school often managed by a local Parent - Teacher Association.
Not exact matches
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to
support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is
often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in
public courthouses and
schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.
Catholic
schools in those days were
often supported by
public funds.
Strong chapters on
school desegregation, bilingual education, education for the disabled, and
school finance all
support Davies's argument that «in the 1970s, reform
often emanated from... within the federal bureaucracy, from the lower federal courts, and through the energetic efforts of congressional staffers, lobbyists, and
public interest law firms.»
School unions, for example, have been cautious in their support, often seeing charters as drawing funds away from resource - starved public school districts and diverting the discussion from how to fix public schools, which continue to serve the vast majority of American stu
School unions, for example, have been cautious in their
support,
often seeing charters as drawing funds away from resource - starved
public school districts and diverting the discussion from how to fix public schools, which continue to serve the vast majority of American stu
school districts and diverting the discussion from how to fix
public schools, which continue to serve the vast majority of American students.
But the longer
school days, intensive
support, and individual attention
public charter
schools provide is
often exactly what it takes to level the playing field for kids from low - income backgrounds.
And so the
public schools are
often in a no - win situation, because they do, thankfully, take everybody, and then they don't get the resources or the help and
support that they need to be able to take care of every child's education.
They make progressive Democrats like me who
support public school choice and
often feel we don't have a home in our own party feel less alone.
In this post David reminds us of much, much more, that we need to remember and also
often recall in defense of our
public schools and in
support of our
schools» futures (e.g., research - based notes to help «fix» some of our
public schools).
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, issued a statement saying that the study demonstrates «that charter
schools are not the panacea they
often are made out to be, and that our national focus must continue to include discussion of how to
support and improve our regular
public schools.»
Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform, an advocacy group that
supports charter
schools and that has been
often aligned with Mr. Klein, put it this way: «Joel Klein made
public education sexy again.»
Also, they
often have to fundraise and secure their own facilities — things for which traditional
public -
school leaders typically have district
support.
They act as if there were no underlying cause for the
often - unsound educational practices, or frequently uneven teaching capacity that exist within our
schools They confuse these symptoms of the problem with the problem itself, which is that our
public schools have been persistently under - resourced, under -
supported, and undermined for decades, including by many of the same people that now purport to «fix» them.»
But you'll never hear her commit to
supporting in
public schools the things educators know get results — such as providing enough teachers and
support professionals to give students the one - on - one attention they
often need.
Public school teachers
often reach into their own pocketbooks to buy essentials like pencils and copy paper for overcrowded classrooms, nevermind having the financial
support to take 95 sixth graders on a bus to a local farm for project work.
It recognizes that
public schools (
often neighborhood hubs), have a unique opportunity to provide access to effective and integrated service delivery that
support conditions for high quality teaching and learning by partnering with organizations representing youth development, academic enrichment, mental and physical health, human services, foster care, early education, adult education, and family engagement.
Schools are
often challenged by how to address high levels of classroom and
public space incidents and unwanted behavior, and how to recalibrate their discipline and
support models to increase student efficacy and success in
school.
Often the affluent urban citizens don't send their children to
public schools, leaving
schools less diverse and less
supported.