the engineering profession
supports principles of fairness and equity in all aspects of engineering culture, practice, and education.»
Not exact matches
We are dedicated to a
principle of fairness that means
support for charter or regular public schools should not come at the other's expense.
Any test
of «
fairness» must look to
principles of distributive or retributive justice and must be
supported by moral reasoning.
First
of all, as an over-arching
principle, the Court in Miglin stated that when evaluating a freely - negotiated spousal
support agreement, judges must achieve a balance between two competing values: 1) the need for a sense
of finality in negotiated spousal agreements; and 2)
fairness.
Hale LJ dissented and expressed concern regarding a general enforceability
of pre-nuptial agreements and that the law should «not introduce a presumption or starting point in favour
of holding the parties to it: the guiding
principle should be
fairness in the light
of the actual and foreseeable circumstances at the time when the court comes to make its order» and stated that «modern marriage still possesses an irreducible minimum, which includes a couple's mutual duty to
support one another and their children».
Giving providers assurance that guidelines can be used only in their favor may be an important step toward gaining their
support; but allowing such one - sided use
of evidence in a court
of law raises disturbing questions
of fairness and
of validity under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments» due process and equal protection mandates, and under state constitutional
principles as well.
However, if the
principle of complementarity is to be applied, states must ensure that their own judicial systems and trials are consistent with international standards
of independence and
fairness, the ICC must be willing to actively
support, embrace, and implement the
principle, and the international community must provide the financial, technical, and professional resources that many struggling states need in this endeavour.
However, the words
of support for creativity in achieving meaningful access to justice should provide some comfort for tribunals and adjudicators looking to design more efficient processes that respect procedural
fairness principles.
NAR continued to ramp up its
support and provide education and materials to assist local and state REALTOR ® associations through the 1980s and 1990s to help keep members apprised
of their obligations to uphold
fairness principles on a daily basis.