[29] CBS Television played up the controversy by portraying it as a Cold War East - West split, singling out German judge Jan Hoffmann in particular for
supposed biased judging.
Not exact matches
So if
judges are
supposed to be impartial, why are some elected if that risks them having
biases towards their constituents?
If
judges are
supposed to be impartial, why are some elected if that risks them having
biases towards their constituents?
In other words, even though
judges are
supposed to be impartial they all carry underlying
biases, such as a tendency to give a lighter sentence after a long lunch break.
I
suppose I have a classic case of confirmation
bias, where I think that insurance companies often forget what they're supposedly in business to do, and some
judges are too willing to let them forget.