You can write volumes on
supposed contradictions in the bible, but you won't write a single word that has not been addressed by some system of theology that removes the contradiction (wether right or wrong).
Quite to the contrary, if approached properly,
supposed contradictions in Scripture can actually help strengthen our faith.
Not exact matches
the bible is full of outright
contradictions and there is no historical evidence for any of the
supposed miracles reported
in the bible.
That being said, you can prove that the Christian God can't possibly exist because of the
contradictions in His
supposed attributes (i.e..
Seems like an obvious
contradiction to me; something that's only
supposed to work as an apologetic against problems with the prevailing God model while,
in fact, it works equally well against all the positive aspects of that same model.
There is then no
contradiction in supposing that a being whose existence is necessary may nevertheless alter
in some respects
in the mode of that existence.
If the God had permitted himself to be born
in an inn, wrapped
in swaddling - clothes and laid
in a manger, could the
contradiction have been greater than that the news of the day should be the swaddling - clothes of the Eternal, aye, as
in the
supposed instance its actual form, so that the Moment is really decisive for eternity!
As we have already pointed out, the system of power culture must eventually fall because of its inner
contradictions, and
in this we can take comfort, but our sense of comfort is premature if we
suppose the failure of one evil system means the reinstitution of that which sensitive men have most prized.
«11 The
contradiction involved here consists
in holding that there is a loss of values and that there is not a loss of values — when God is
supposed to have his past incorporated into his present according to the same principle by which finite individuals inherit their pasts.
There are far too many holes
in the whole story, even
contradictions in the different books of the new testament telling what's
supposed to be the same story... and not things that could be shrugged off as just viewpoint differences but factual differences.
In view of his supposed rejection of any static logic of identity and contradiction, it is not without interest that Altizer can not acknowledge a dialectical relationship that comes to terms with a coincidence of real opposites but only with such an understanding of dialectics as will lead to its own destruction by the annihilation of the polarity in a final, posthistorical, permanent identit
In view of his
supposed rejection of any static logic of identity and
contradiction, it is not without interest that Altizer can not acknowledge a dialectical relationship that comes to terms with a coincidence of real opposites but only with such an understanding of dialectics as will lead to its own destruction by the annihilation of the polarity
in a final, posthistorical, permanent identit
in a final, posthistorical, permanent identity.
What has here been said applies to the historical
in the direct and ordinary sense, whose only
contradiction is that it has come into existence, which
contradiction is implicit
in all coming into existence.3 Here again one must guard against the illusion of
supposing that it is easier to understand after the event than before the event.
(c) If the fact
in question is an absolute fact, or to determine it still more precisely, if it is the fact we have described, it would be a
contradiction to
suppose that time had any power to differentiate the fortunes of men with respect to it, that is to say,
in any decisive sense.
I
suppose there's a
contradiction there... that man on the hill with all his umbrellas... he would place them
in the thunderstorm regardless of whether he got struck by lightning or not.
The
contradiction is that the bailout bill is
supposed to give lenders more confidence, while interest rates
in general typically fall during an economic slowdown.
Upon entering the gallery space, the viewer is confronted by an installation consisting of three video projections that present the most pressing questions concerning the
supposed objectivity of academic knowledge by pointing out the corporatization of institutions of higher learning
in the United States and the sometimes controversial positions that universities fall into when trying to physically expand amidst disenfranchised communities, as well as falling into possible
contradictions with the agendas of university donors.
I
suppose that «contemplative percussionist» would be a
contradiction in terms.
4)
Contradictions that current theory may not be able to resolve (e.g., is antarctica
supposed to gain or lose ice mass
in the short term?).
But there is a strange
contradiction in the
supposed effect of a tax.