(2) «Regarding the statements presented in the FM post, only somebody well - versed in atmospheric / climate science could determine how
the supposed effects of clouds / vapor / water / sun / etc have been taken into account in newer models»
Re 106 — Actually, the «iris
effect» mechanism is
supposed to involve a shrinking
of high
cloud area (if it is true), see also http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NasaNews/2002/200201167312.html.
Since the less than positive feedback
of clouds in the tropics appears to be the reason that the tropical troposphere hot spot signature
of WMGHG warming is missing which implies that the water vapor and
cloud feedbacks that are
supposed to produce 2/3
of the GHG
effect warming are not following the game plan, Spencer et al., by averaging ever damn thing they would find that might possibly show the tropical troposphere hot spot, are basically telling Trenberth and Dessler, «told ya so!»