If you ask for the reason of such an article, maybe you should know that there are plenty of
supposed experts who would use such a film, made by filmmakers and promoted by promotional people, as «scientific evidence» to «educate» pregnant women and couples about the risks of medicalized birth.
Not exact matches
What is the point of him having a number two
who is
supposed to be a defensive
expert.
You wouldn't hire a doctor for a c - section
who said, «Well actually I'm not really comfortable with that type of birth, but I'll let you do it if you want, I
suppose...» If you're planning a safe, natural, unmedicated birth, you should hire someone
who is an
EXPERT at supporting natural birth.
This naïveté is both good news and bad news: Good news because it's cute someone
who can't think on a cruel enough level to be able to discern the truth, bad news because you don't want someone
supposed to be an
expert on terrorism think without abstracting human descency.
I'm busier than I've ever been in my life because the
experts who are
supposed to be being the
experts,
who are
supposed to be being the leaders and leading the field, are dropping the ball.
So the chiropractor has to pick up the literature and he's got ta read it and he's got ta be able to apply it with his patients and he's got ta be able to apply functional medicine, you know, and I — and I just say that because that — that is one of the things that makes me the maddest, it — it, you know, it's frustrating to deal with every patient coming through the door
who's so frustrated because they've been to 8 to 9 or 10 different doctors
who are
supposed to be the leading
experts.
«If you look at a school as a place where
experts do
expert intervention around education, when that is failing, what you do is kick out all the people
who are
supposed to be doing it.
For traditionalists, Parent Trigger laws are even more an affront because it violates their belief that only
supposed «
experts» such as themselves can actually what kids can learn and
who should teach them.
Being lucky or smart in one area doesn't make you smart in all things I've grown up with people from the Ivy Covered Snob Factories
who claimed the were my intellectual betters and found that they couldn't keep up with me on things where they
supposed to be
expert.
As a business valuation
expert who has critiqued many valuations of
supposed experts I can safely say there is a 99 % chance (totally made that up but it has to be true) that you can find some data somewhere to support you argument.
In collecting Stubbs and Turner, Hyams was collecting British artists
who truly matter and are truly relevant today, and tomorrow, rather than getting confused as so many
supposed experts are by a fashion for very ordinary «modern» British art.
I
suppose if one argues that the cloistered
expert who is picking this prior knows some physics, then she might choose a translated Cauchy centered at 1.2 K for 2xCO2.
First, a climate scientist
who is qualified as an
expert can make any of the assertions that the consensus is
supposed to embrace on his or her expertise alone.
I consider it a huge red flag that people
who oppose basic science like the greenhouse properties of carbon dioxide are unable to explain how it's
supposed to work (they instead declare it can not work) or how
experts could come to think it would work.
Any citing by climate zealots of the opinions of
supposed experts should be met by a referral to the «
experts»
who confined Galileo to home imprisonment, and the reminder that «appeal to authority» is a recognized logical fallacy.
The people
who are
supposed to be
experts and
who claim to understand the science are precisely the people
who are blind to the evidence.
Taqiyyah has even been cited by former CIA Director, James Woolsey and other
supposed «
experts» on the subject, including Dr. Andrew Campbell,
who states,
«
Suppose you have an
expert witness on the stand
who has written a paper on the topic under examination,» Kiteley adds.
The client need not speculate about what is reasonable once the lawyer,
who is
supposed to be an
expert in the field, creates a road map that the map maker must then follow.
For example,
suppose the key person is a gifted presenter, perhaps a motivational self - help
expert,
who is responsible for selling the seminars and personal growth products that the company offers.
The argument against OLED coming to the iPad 3 is made by OLED - Display,
who spoke to many
experts and analysts about Apple's
supposed AMOLED plans.
Some
experts feel that this so - called «discretion» needs to be defined much more clearly since, as it is being reported in many cases, this privilege may have been exploited or abused at times, at the expense of MAs,
who might be left to face the consequences for being asked to do things that they were, quite frankly, never
supposed to be doing.
How exactly is someone
who is not an
expert on North Carolina family law
supposed to know whether they have a complex legal issue?
Do you
suppose there is any way to correct the damage done, in this regard, by agents
who are either interviewed by media TV, for example, or appear as local
experts on popular TV shows, invited to educate the public on the best of best the public needs to know, only to repetitively declare: «everybody knows the seller pays the commission; that it costs the buyer nothing.»