Sentences with phrase «supposed reasons for»

Moreover, there are other supposed reasons for not writing a cover letter.

Now there's a myriad of supposed reasons for this inactivity in the transfer market, Many slating Wenger and even more justifying this with statements about the clubs cash reserves and also its self - sufficient business model etc, and there's so much touted by everybody who has an opinion that it's really hard to know where the truth even begins to lay.

Whatever the supposed reason for the women serving at the shrine, despite their being sometimes loftily called «wives of the gods,» they were the source of all Togbe's plenty, and that made life very good for him.

The supposed reason for our decision not to do this was that the «update» does not support our supposedly desired message of unprecedented modern warmth (because they appear to suggest that tree growth rate was greater during earlier times including the medieval period; Figure 2b, compare purple and black lines).

Not exact matches

More importantly for Amazon, the tablet is supposed to encourage users to buy more Amazon products and services, which is part of the reason why the company is selling the device so cheaply.

The heavy concrete is supposed to make a body sink to the bottom of a river or the ocean, but — for reasons that remain unclear — it might not have worked in this case.

Suppose that beer production is 100, but for some reason - less beer on international markets, more pizza or some combination of the two - the relative demand for beer increases, and beer producers are now able to obtain three pizzas for one beer.

I suppose, and as I noted on Monday, making Allo unencrypted by default was a bad look (although understandable for non-advertising related reasons, specifically the deep integration with Google Assistant).

Everything happens for a reason, I suppose.

Atheists will never argue «let's suppose God existed» and use backward chaining reasoning to see if there's any plausible explanation, simply because it's like assuming Santa Claus exists and trying to build a plausible reason for how that could be possible.

So everything that happens is what was supposed to happen, and men just fall in line with some plan they can never know and never change or alter in any way — puppets in God's great master plan for some unknown reason!

Most eventually go back to believing, so I suppose it's not a surprise that none of them would have been available for the study, but in any given group of atheists there are always a good number who say they don't believe while secretly looking for a reason to go back.

It's as good a reason as any for being anti-Catholic, we suppose.

I suppose there's a reason they use kids for these baptisms.

What reason have we for supposing that a mammal is more than a polypary?

If that doesn't sound like your Christianity, it's because you weren't listening when Jesus said we are supposed to be hated by everyone, including our unbelieving family members, and that we are supposed to be persecuted and despised and called bad names and crucified every single day for telling the truth about who He is — the reason He was crucified.

To some degree, I suppose, it would be akin to choosing to remain a virgin, for those without a strong sex drive, this may not be that difficult, for others it may be a great hardship, but for whatever personal reasons, they choose to stay celibate.

I suppose some people have good reason for hating religion.

For me I figured that if there is a God out there who does who does actually have a plan for us and if part of that plan is to not be made known but would rather have us develop faith, and if the reason for why we need to have faith is to see if we are going to follow God because we choose to instead of being made to have to follow, and if the reason for all of those commandments is to somehow be for our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for myseFor me I figured that if there is a God out there who does who does actually have a plan for us and if part of that plan is to not be made known but would rather have us develop faith, and if the reason for why we need to have faith is to see if we are going to follow God because we choose to instead of being made to have to follow, and if the reason for all of those commandments is to somehow be for our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor us and if part of that plan is to not be made known but would rather have us develop faith, and if the reason for why we need to have faith is to see if we are going to follow God because we choose to instead of being made to have to follow, and if the reason for all of those commandments is to somehow be for our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor why we need to have faith is to see if we are going to follow God because we choose to instead of being made to have to follow, and if the reason for all of those commandments is to somehow be for our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor all of those commandments is to somehow be for our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor our benefit, and if I really want to and need to know, which I did, and that this supposed God wanted for us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor us to find out through study, prayer and trying to practice those teachings to see for ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor ourselves and then make our choice, then I figured to do just that and find out for mysefor myself.

Bohr, by a certain insight, was led to suppose that there is a lowest orbit, for reasons that are entirely outside of our understanding at present.

There are numerous reasons for this, I suppose.

I suppose that's alright for some people — it's called «faith» for a reason.

Somehow, people are supposed to be able to tell when it is god that is causing good things to happen, when it is the devil causing good things to happen (to trick us and lead us astray), and that bad things happening isn't from god, but that it happens for god's reasons.

If God is good and powerful as the theist believes, then he will indeed have a good reason for permitting evil; but why suppose the theist must be in a position to figure out what it is?

The reason for including classes and relations as part of the content of mathematics in «Mathematics» is that the theory of classes and relations, like all mathematics under the thesis of Principia Mathematica, is supposed to be deducible from the «ultimate logical premises» (MAT 292).

I can not see any reason to suppose that this need for objective criticism of immediate insights is less today than it was in St. Paul's time, or in Luther's and Calvin's.

It has been commonly supposed that the original end has been lost, or suppressed, or alternatively that for some reason the original author never succeeded in finishing his Gospel.

Nature has been «groaning» since the first appearance of biological species unless we suppose it was allowed for some reason in anticipation of the fall.

Otherwise, what reason do we have for supposing that God, as «author of the whole drama,» meant the statement to be understood, in the light of subsequent developments, as a reference to humanity's future redemption?»

I suppose some will count that as one less reason for lifting the embargo.

We may suppose that this is the primary reason for the centrality of the resurrection in the Christian faith.

The reason is supposed to be that there is no appropriate place for it in the System.

Israel is the one history the church is supposed to understand, especially when we find ourselves at the same crossroads, and for the same reasons.

I suppose when going against the status quo at the same time the challenge exist for one to do so in truth and love, for the right reasons lest one should slip into conduct that is no better than the unhealthy authorised norms one is up against?

Finally, for Whitehead there is no reason to suppose that below this higher unity of the lived world there should be a highly intense experiential activity.

(E.g., Judith 16:17) As for the permanence of this torture chamber, while the Greek word, a i w u i o (may mean age - long, and the corresponding Hebrew word means the same, there is no clear reason for supposing that Jesus entertained any mitigating thought about what he called «eternal punishment,» (Matthew 25:46) or saw any end to its quenchless fire.

Did it come, as some supposed, from disloyalty to their old pagan faiths, or were there other and far different reasons for failure?

It also stands to reason that a person on trial may use a supposed delusional mental state to attempt to get off for the crime they are on trial for.

However, if we now agree that Premise X is only metaphysically false (and not logically false), i.e., if we agree that it is only metaphysically impossible (and not logically impossible) for one being's activities to be completely determined by another, given the analysis of «X is omnipotent» with which we have been working, there would be no apparent reason for supposing that it is not within the power of an omnipotent being to completely determine each of the activities of all other beings and thus to bring about a world devoid of evil.

The fact that S is precluded by metaphysical principles provides no reason at all for supposing that X's bringing about S is not logically possible.

Unfortunately, however, we can not ground subjective unity in the superject, for two reasons: (1) The superject is completely determinate, and hence devoid of activity; it can not do any of the things subjects are supposed to do.

What would be the reasoning for this Director of a supposed Christian Organization to both invert the colors of the flag of Chile and the Star (Pentagram) on the Chilean flag?

So there was a sense of outrage when the Club of Rome produced its report entitled Limits to Growth (Meadows et al. 1972), which gave reasons for supposing that the goal of economic growth in material goods had limits, despite the possibilities of progress of science and technology in the future.

Well idiotusmaximus does exist but not the 2300 gods that have come and gone... people create gods in their own image for a reason... Love Aristotle who was supposed to have said... I THINK THAT IF HORSES HAD GODS THEY»D PROBABLY LOOK LIKE HORSES... that is gods in a nutshell... they're the go to answer for the ignorant and lazy.

Martin weighs the merits of his «all truths are timeless,» or can be so formulated without loss of truth, against what he takes to be my view (for no reason in my writings that I can see) that all are time - bound; he ignores the moderate or less extreme view that some (namely, truths about extremely universal and abstract, eternal and necessary things, including the essential structure of time as such) are timeless, and others (those about less universal and abstract, also non-eternal and contingent things) are time - bound, but this not in every way a careless thinker might suppose but in a definite and logically intelligible way.

Suppose that for some reason the chemical doctrine had been highly prized throughout some district as the foundation of its social order — would it have been wise, would it have been candid, would it have been moral, to forbid the disclosure of the fact that the experiments produced discordant results?

Secular rationalism may be the right road, may be the Truth as it claims to be; but it has come to be felt that there is no a priori intellectual or universal reason for supposing so from the start, so that it may sit in unchallenged judgment on equally massive and venerated traditions, Christian, Hindu, or whatever, that make the same claim.

But maybe for some reason we're supposed to have this baby, she suggests.

Within the Christian tradition, however, the millennium is also regarded as significant for reasons quite other than the supposed birth - date of Jesus Christ.

Every church is imperfect, and some may need to be left behind to go somewhere else for one reason or another, but the Church is the body and bride of christ where discipleship is supposed to occur and from where the spreading of the gospel emanates through those sent out for such work.