If the public is fully informed of the magnitude of the existing
consensus in the
scientific community, if the public is informed of how our modification of the atmosphere is effecting the
climate, if the public learn of the magnitude of the effect those
changes will have
on the common wealth of the entire world, which I expect he would admit is necessarily going to be quite negative, and if the public are then presented with the choice of voting for a government which would take substantial meaningful action, does he
suppose that the reaction would then be to do nothing?