But it does suggest a more reliable formula for spotting exceptional talent among people who appear not to possess it according to
supposedly objective measures of scientific promise.
Not exact matches
In ten years, I bet we'll be kicking ourselves for having placed so much emphasis on these
supposedly «
objective»
measures.
I don't think we see those same forces playing out or advancing against the tenure system in academia simply because of the belief that in academia there is
supposedly a more
objective measure of what quality is, as
measured by the existing tenure process linked to the meritocracy.