Government officials have been as bad as or worse than alarmist scientists in attempting to
suppress skeptical climate research and speech, and hiding their efforts from public view.
Not exact matches
Anybody with an education in the sciences can tell when a credentialed charlatan is violating scientific method, «cherry - picking» data, manipulating computer simulations (
climate models) to «draw the curve, then plot the points,» concealing his raw observational data sets from properly
skeptical examiners, corrupting academic peer review (both to
suppress the publication of colleagues» studies casting doubt upon the reviewing officers» pet hypotheses and to ensure that the submissions of «The Team» do not suffer impediments to publication), and concerting all these violations of professional ethical standards by way of back - room confabs and some of the most incredibly stupid e-mails this side of Enron's «Smartest Guys in the Room.»
«We don't fully understand how to input things like changes in the oceans, and because we don't fully understand it you could say that natural variability is now working to
suppress the warming,» Jones admitted to the paper, apparently acknowledging what
skeptical climate scientists have been attempting to convey for years.
NASA's new lead global warming scientist, Gavin Schmidt, has history of belittling
skeptical scientists,
suppressing debate, condoning making
climate data «impenetrable» and many of his scientific claims and his website RealClimate.org, have been harshly criticized by scientists from around the world.