The first - ever primer on Canada's Constitution for anyone who wants to understand
the supreme body of law in the land.
* All countries have
a supreme body of law, which may or may not be called a Constitution per se, and may not be contained within a single document.
Not exact matches
The foundation on which the Jewish establishment rested was the assumption that
supreme and unquestionable authority resided in the
Law of Moses and could be rightly exercised only by the governing
body believed to be in true succession to the lawgiver.
In the federal employment anti-discrimination
laws, a specific exception exists for religious
bodies that discriminate on the basis
of religion, and a couple
of years ago, in the Hosanna - Tabor case, the
Supreme Court held that the Constitution allows religious
bodies to discriminate with respect to the employment
of ministers.
The world becomes much more a
body in which God lives than a machine in which the
laws of mechanics reign
supreme.
Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament is the
supreme law - making
body: its Acts are the highest source
of English
law.
This is because the
Supreme Court has ruled that, when a grant
of regulatory authority «lay [s] down by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or
body authorized to [act] is directed to conform», Congress is not unconstitutionally delegating its ability to make
laws.
The umbrella
body of Muslim faithfuls in Nigeria, the Nigerian
Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), has announced its plan to embark on a nationwide protest against the Nigerian
Law School over its law against the use of hij
Law School over its
law against the use of hij
law against the use
of hijab.
PARENTEAU: It's testing these theories which are very similar against a
body of state
law, in different states as you just mentioned, and so it's probing, it's trying to find a breakthrough case where you can find a state
supreme court willing to make a really bold decision finding not only a right to a healthy environment, or a safe climate, stable climate, but also finding a duty on the part
of the government to take real tangible action to address that.
With its authority the
Supreme Court has created two
bodies that handle the admissions process: The Standing Committee on Character and Fitness and The Board
of Law Examiners.
The
Supreme Court
of Canada, in a 2002 landmark decision, held that governing
bodies, such as the provincial
law societies, have no jurisdiction generally to sanction or penalize prosecutors for the exercise
of their prosecutorial discretion.
As an international
law firm, our Yangon office includes lawyers who are admitted in Myanmar and are regulated by The
Supreme Court
of the Republic
of the Union
of Myanmar and lawyers who are qualified in other jurisdictions and who are regulated by the relevant regulatory
body in their place
of admission.
In 1982 Parliament — that same
body elected by the Canadian people that now complains so bitterly — decided that Canada needed not just another
law on par with all other federal
laws, but a Constitutional
law elevated as the «
supreme law of Canada» [section 52 (1)-RSB- that would set limits and restrictions on all government powers in accordance with fundamental rights and freedoms inherent to all Canadians.
«I am pleased to announce the nomination
of Mr. Justice Nadon, whose extraordinary
body of legal work — as a longtime judge on both the Federal Court and the Federal Court
of Appeal; judicial member
of the Competition Tribunal; expert in maritime and transportation
law with almost 20 years as a practicing member
of the Barreau du Québec; arbitrator; teacher; and author — makes him an ideal candidate for the
Supreme Court
of Canada.»
In the test case that came before the
Supreme Court in 2010, Holder v. Humanitarian
Law Project, the Court held that it was constitutional to prohibit a group of humanitarian legal professionals (including a retired U.S. judge) «from engaging in certain specified activities, including training PKK members to use international law to resolve disputes peacefully; teaching PKK members to petition the United Nations and other representative bodies for relief; and engaging in political advocacy on behalf of Kurds living in Turkey and Tamils living in Sri Lanka.&raq
Law Project, the Court held that it was constitutional to prohibit a group
of humanitarian legal professionals (including a retired U.S. judge) «from engaging in certain specified activities, including training PKK members to use international
law to resolve disputes peacefully; teaching PKK members to petition the United Nations and other representative bodies for relief; and engaging in political advocacy on behalf of Kurds living in Turkey and Tamils living in Sri Lanka.&raq
law to resolve disputes peacefully; teaching PKK members to petition the United Nations and other representative
bodies for relief; and engaging in political advocacy on behalf
of Kurds living in Turkey and Tamils living in Sri Lanka.»
The request for a preliminary ruling by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (
Supreme Court
of the Netherlands) is part
of a growing
body of case -
law on the interpretation
of Article 3 (1)
of the InfoSoc Directive (Directive 2001 / 29 / EC).
Avvo General Counsel Josh King on the
Supreme Court's decision in North Carolina Board
of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission: The court made no bones about it, siding with the FTC: the regulatory
bodies of self - regulated professions (like dentistry and the
law) only get immunity from antitrust liability if they are «actively supervised» by -LSB-...]
The invitation to participate in the survey was found on Lexum's
Supreme Court
of Canada's decisions web site (scc.lexum.org/en) and sent through the related e-mail distribution list, so it could be that the respondents come out
of a group more interested in free access to
law than the general
body of legal information users.
Limits
of «reasonableness» on ethical and practice rules: Implied limits on the powers
of professional regulatory
bodies to superintend their professions was illustrated by the B.C.
Supreme Court's decision that a college unreasonably exercised its by -
law making powers in Sobeys West Inc. v. College
of Pharmacists
of British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1414 (under appeal).
Most
of its public officials, its legislative
body and many
of its
law enforcement agents have openly defied the desegregation decision
of the
Supreme Court.
«I am pleased to announce the nomination
of Mr. Justice Nadon, whose extraordinary
body of legal work — as a longtime judge on both the Federal Court and the Federal Court
of Appeal; judicial member
of the Competition Tribunal; expert in maritime and transportation
law with almost 20 years as a practicing member
of the Barreau du Québec; arbitrator; teacher; and author — makes him an ideal candidate for the
Supreme Court
of Canada,» said Prime Minister Harper.
The
Supreme Court's decision in R (on the application
of E) v Governing
Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15, [2009] All ER (D) 163 (Dec) provides a fine example
of the
law of unintended consequences.
Thereafter, in either
of the above cases, whenever the governor transmits to the president
of the senate and the speaker
of the house his written declaration that no inability exists such vacancy shall be deemed to have terminated four days thereafter and the governor shall resume the powers and duties
of his office unless the chief justice and a majority
of the associate justices
of the
supreme judicial court, or such other
body as the general court may by
law provide, transmit within said four days to the president
of the senate and the speaker
of the house their written declaration that the governor is unable to discharge the powers and duties
of his office.
Whenever the chief justice and a majority
of the associate justices
of the
supreme judicial court, or such other
body as the general court may by
law provide, transmit to the president
of the senate and the speaker
of the house their written declaration that the governor is unable to discharge the powers and duties
of his office, the office
of governor shall be deemed to be vacant within the meaning
of this Constitution.