Sentences with phrase «supreme court considers»

When the Supreme Court considers the legality of an executive order (which only happens when someone brings a case that the court agrees to hear) they use Justice Jackson's Test from Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v Sawyer (1952).

Supreme Court considers who can challenge government eavesdropping to combat terrorism, Reuters

Elected judges across America arehoping that the U.S. Supreme Court considers the appearance of impartiality to be more important than any infringement of First Amendment rights.

In this area of law — for reasons unknown — the Supreme Court considers only its own decisions.»

Supreme Court Considers Whether Those Who Arrange Oil and Gas Leases Need Real Estate Licenses

Missouri Supreme Court Considers Discoverability Of Psychiatric Records When Psychiatric Injuries Are Not Claimed In Personal Injury Lawsuit In Case Handled By Boyle Brasher LLC

Supreme Court Considers an Aging Death Row.»

«Article Database for Lawyers Main Supreme Court Considers Liability for Secondary Actors in Securities Fraud»

It's lawyers versus realtors, accountants, architects, title insurers and a slew of other professions as the Hawaii Supreme Court considers a proposal to tighten the state's definition of law practice.

«Supreme Court Considers Liability for Secondary Actors in Securities Fraud Main Sneak Peak: The Top Law Schools»

«Good news on the violent crime rate Main Georgia Supreme Court considers banishment as punishment»

Supreme Court considers credit card surcharges — If New York's surcharge ban falls, other states could domino, bringing retailers a step closer to charging extra to use plastic... (See Surcharges)

Guest Blog: Texas Supreme Court Considers Applicability of Texas Whistleblower Act to Charter Schools

The Atlantic The Supreme Court Considers Whether Churches Should Get Taxpayer DollarsEducation Week First Wave of ESSA Plans Gives Early Look at State Priorities

On Top of the News Wisconsin Supreme Court Considers Stay in Act 10 Case 11/11/13 Milwaukee Journal - Sentinel

«As the New York State Supreme Court considers the serious voting - access and counting issues in the 13th Congressional District election, we are pleased to welcome Marty Connor to lead our legal team,» Mr. Espaillat's spokesman, Ibrahim Khan, said in a press release.

The brief Gibson signed on to this week makes a conservative, limited - government case for same - sex marriage rights as the Supreme Court considers the legality of bans in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee.

Washington (CNN)-- As the Supreme Court considers two major same - sex marriage cases that could change marriage in the United States, religious leaders on both sides of the debate believe they are on God's side of the contentious issue.

Though he was facing 20 years in prison, in May 2010 Bruno was sentenced to just two years in prison — and he was allowed to remain free while the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the law used to convict him.

THE BRONX — As the U.S. Supreme Court considered another major case centered on gay marriage, two high - profile Bronx politicians offered their own opinions on the matter.

This was after he made comments the supreme court considered contemptuous, and jailed him for three days in 2013, alongside NPP's Ken Kuranchie, then editor of the Daily Searchlight Newspaper, who was also jailed 10 - days for a similar offence.

For an assessment of one such case that could help states clarify matters on school vouchers — which the Supreme Court considered just days after Justice Gorsuch's arrival on the bench — check out this issue's editor's letter.

The campaign comes as a result of the Supreme Court considering whether councils should fine parents who take their children out of school for the sake of a holiday.

During its inaugural 2014 - 15 year, the program moved forward while the state Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of sending public dollars to private, religious schools that are subject to very little oversight by the state.

In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the first of these cases, known as Friedrichs v. CTA.

In 2016, the Supreme Court considered Friedrichs v. CTA.

On appeal, the Supreme Court considered, among other things, when it appropriate to impose personal liability for oppression can be imposed on corporate directors.

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court considering this section and determining whether a motorist can be partially at fault for a crash for failing to have their lights on prior to sunset.

The Supreme Court considered whether the English Court, as an enforcing court of a Nigerian arbitral award, was entitled to require a party resisting enforcement to provide security for the money payable under the award as a condition of being entitled to advance a good arguable defence that enforcement should be refused on grounds of English public policy, e.g. because the award was procured by fraud.

Earlier this week reasons were released by the BC Supreme Court considering whether to award damages for the cost of medical marijuana cream to a Plaintiff who suffered from chronic pain following a vehicle collision.

The Supreme Court considered that as the petitioners were allowed to rely on material not before the decision - maker, it would seem artificial, and even unfair not to allow the respondents to refine the «legitimate aims» previously advanced by reference to new material.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, according to this article, Supreme Court Justices Have Pointed Abortion Discourse (AP 11/8/06).

The Supreme Court considered whether the grant of the order breached Art 8 of the European Charter.

In two conjoined cases, (Essop and Naeem) the Supreme Court considered whether a claimant in an indirect discrimination claim has to prove the reason why a PCP puts (or would put) an affected group at a particular disadvantage, and whether the reason has to relate to the protected characteristic.

The report attributed the rise to a de facto moratorium on executions for four months in 2008 while the Supreme Court considered a case involving lethal injections.

This deception is a factor which the Supreme Court considered relevant to the first inquiry under 24 (2) analysis, given the «need for a court to dissociate itself from such behaviour» (para. 26).

In awarding Ms. Cabott the equivalent of six months of reasonable notice, the Supreme Court considered her age, the fact that she was in the latter stages of her career, her specialized knowledge, her senior position as a supervisor, and the expectation of secure employment and possible eventual transition of work and retirement to Vancouver.

She proposes that, state supreme courts consider amending their Rules of Professional Conduct to grant more flexibility to lawyers so they may participate in business ventures with other professions.

In Langford v Carson Air Ltd., the B.C. Supreme Court considered an employer's ability to dismiss an employee without notice during the probationary period, and offered some guidance on the actual purpose of a probationary period.

The Supreme Court considered this question in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252 (2009).

The Supreme Court considered that the Appeal Court, in assessing the compatibility of the extradition with ECHR, art 3, had applied the wrong legal test.

A seven member Supreme Court considered these questions.

916, 74 L.Ed.2 d 74, the Supreme Court considered, and rejected, the same arguments made by this defendant, but in the context of federal constitutional guarantees.

The Supreme Court considered that, as the services of freezing and refrigeration provided by the relevant plant have been held to be used «mainly or exclusively» as part of the Appellant's trade process, they should be left out of account for rating purposes.

Reasons for judgement were released yesterday by the BC Supreme Court considering whether a pedestrian involved in a collision was at fault for not being visible enough to the motorist.

In Derrickson, the Supreme Court considered whether the provisions in British Columbia's Family Relations Act, RSBC 1996, c 128, concerning the right to ownership and possession of immovable property applied to reserve lands (para 43).

The B.C. Supreme Court considered these questions, and the judgment is great news for people who earn part of their income from tips.

In Robbinsville, the New Jersey Supreme Court considered whether Keyport «supports a general proposition that, in times of economic crisis, a school board may unilaterally impose furlough days on teaching staff members in contravention of the parties» collective negotiation agreement governing terms and conditions of employment.»

The Supreme Court considered several arguments from the plaintiffs as to why the LIA should not preempt their claims.

Then, in Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 569 N.E. 2d 875 (Ohio 1991), the Ohio Supreme Court considered facts quite like Murthy — the prescriber had treated the patient under an investigational research protocol and received a per patient payment from the manufacturer.