Sentences with phrase «supreme court instead»

A plan for one supreme court instead of four has been a plan for a long time.

The appeal court sent the case back to the preliminary inquiry judge, but N.S. appealed the decision to the Supreme Court instead.

Isn't this e.g. why FDR had to attempt packing the Supreme Court instead of firing (some of) its judges?

Not exact matches

For precisely the same reasons that I found your statement to be laughable, the government must insure that mechanisms are put in place to insure that the actual persons granted free speech rights by the Supreme Court (the owners of the corporations) are the ones actually exercising their new rights instead of having those rights stolen by fat - cat executives and self - appointed boards.

Instead, the Supreme Court has made clear that federal agencies, acting under the authority granted to them by Congress, can regulate arbitration procedures to protect statutory rights.

One might have thought that that would be the end of the matter, but instead Burnaby commenced this action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking a declaration (at para 13) «that the National Energy Board does not have the constitutional jurisdiction to issue an order to the City of Burnaby that directs or limits the City of Burnaby in the enforcement of its bylaws.»

Liberal MLA Mary Polak (Langley) was instrumental as a Surrey School Board trustee in banning gay - positive books from Surrey Schools: The book ban was later struck down by the Supreme Court of Canada which said «instead of proceeding on the basis of respect for all types of families, the Board proceeded on an exclusionary philosophy, acting on the concern of certain parents about the morality of same - sex relationships, without considering the interest of same - sex parented families and the children who belong to them in receiving equal recognition and respect in the school system.»

The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled yesterday that a nonbiological mother has the same rights as a biological one, overturning a lower court ruling that had given parental rights to her child's anonymous sperm donor insCourt ruled yesterday that a nonbiological mother has the same rights as a biological one, overturning a lower court ruling that had given parental rights to her child's anonymous sperm donor inscourt ruling that had given parental rights to her child's anonymous sperm donor instead.

This means that in case of a tie the supreme court fails to fulfill its purpose and instead leaves the matter in legal limbo.

Acting Supreme Court Judge Daniel J. McCullough, 65, stepped down last month, after a state ethics probe determined that he «persistently failed to report to work» since April 2014 instead of going on proper medical leave.

For instance, this year's benchmark for the federal budget is $ 42 but oil now goes for over $ 70 per barrel and instead of paying all the revenues to the Federation Account, the FG still operates an Excess Crude Oil Account contrary to the judgment of the Supreme Court and they spend such funds without recourse to appropriate authorities,» he said.

However, at the Supreme Court, they instead based the decision on the fourteenth amendment.

The Missouri Supreme Court appointed a six - member panel to draw the boundaries instead.

President Nana Addo Dankwah Akufo - Addo has revealed that he could have been finishing his second term as president instead of the commencement of his mandate if the Supreme Court had upheld the 2012 election petition brought before it.

A state court of appeals in February refused to issue an opinion on the lawsuit, and instead asked the supreme court to decide...

He also refuses to spell out how the proposed lines that he's called «hyper political» should be changed, instead preferring to quote the former US Supreme Court Judge who was asked to define obscenity.

But last month, the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the convictions, ruling that jury instructions hadn't reflected a later U.S. Supreme Court finding that narrowed federal corruption laws, requiring officials to exercise power instead of just make a phone call or set up a meeting.

Jepsen, also a Democrat, announced in December 2013 that he was suspending an effort to get the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling against the state by a three - judge panel of the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in May of that year, and instead said he would try to limit the state's exposure to damages by seeking to negotiate a settlement with SEBAC.

In his substantive appeal to the Supreme Court against the appeal court judgment, Saraki maintained that the panel of the CCT was not well constituted because it comprised two members instead of three provided for byCourt against the appeal court judgment, Saraki maintained that the panel of the CCT was not well constituted because it comprised two members instead of three provided for bycourt judgment, Saraki maintained that the panel of the CCT was not well constituted because it comprised two members instead of three provided for by law.

When the Commission launched a new logo instead of implementing the recommendations made by the Supreme Court after the 2013 election petition, I consoled myself with the belief that the logo may be the start of reforms at the EC.

We prepared for battle when the Supreme Court ruled on the ACA, and instead got to celebrate when they upheld the law.

He wants a delay while he asks the Supreme Court to end the case for lack of evidence, instead of having a retrial.

President - Elect Donald Trump's pro-life platform against abortion, along with his support for traditional family values, marriage as stated in the Bible as one man and one woman instead of same - sex marriage, in favor of prayer and the reading of sacred scripture in our public schools, and his promise to appoint conservative judges to the United States Supreme Court made Evangelicals and even Democrats who espouse those positions to support Donald Trump.

But the Supreme Court in its ruling today [Thursday] May 5, instead ordered the deletion of the names of all those who registered with the NHIS cards.

Instead it has asked the Supreme Court to send the case back to the appellate court so that it can be reconsidered in light of the new greenhouse gas regulatory regCourt to send the case back to the appellate court so that it can be reconsidered in light of the new greenhouse gas regulatory regcourt so that it can be reconsidered in light of the new greenhouse gas regulatory regime.)

So therefore, I would suggest that if they really believe that to be the case, they should immediately push for the impeachment of both the President and both houses of Congress which are willing to ignore such an obvious threat to the continued existence of humanity and instead waste time on (what this relegates to) trivial issues like Iraq, Social Security, Medicare, taxes, terrorism, fiscal budget deficits, Katrina, abortion, Bird flu, the Supreme Court, education, etc..

And the recent Supreme Court decision didn't make the film feel like a musty period piece — instead, it seemed to add resonance and immediacy, turning a small victory in one community into the harbinger of greater things to come.

In their appeal to the Supreme Court, state officials did not stress the merits of the law but argued instead that the plaintiffs who challenged it lacked the legal standing to do so.

Instead one should focus on whether there is an opportunity to achieve the goals of education — and here the Court adopted the original outcome goals promulgated two decades ago in the Rose decision of the Kentucky Supreme Court.

Instead, the State Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the King County Superior Court «for an appropriate order.»

In the wake of the Supreme Court's hostility to race - conscious integration and in recognition of the disproportionate number of minority, and especially black, children from poor families, localities have adopted plans to integrate schools by income instead of race.

Washington courts may approve of state discrimination against religion, but the U.S. Supreme Court has adopted instead a rule of neutrality: «State power is no more to be used so as to handicap religions, than it is to favor them.»

Section 7 explains why our Supreme Court should repeal tax breaks for the rich instead of closing our public schools.

However, the state supreme court found that the use of funds appropriated in SB 515, for K - 12 public education, to instead fund the ESA program violated the requirements of Article 11, Sections 2 and 6.

In Norwood, the Supreme Court rejected this theory and instead chose to see the transaction for what it was.

And as Zimmerman sums up a 2006 Supreme Court case — Garcetti v. Ceballos — «public employees do not have free - speech rights at work; instead, their words belong to their employer.»

The Associated Press states that the Supreme Court will be deciding whether student loans can be dismissed through bankruptcy with just a notice to the collector instead of a hearing proving that paying the money back would cause an «undue hardship».

So therefore, I would suggest that if they really believe that to be the case, they should immediately push for the impeachment of both the President and both houses of Congress which are willing to ignore such an obvious threat to the continued existence of humanity and instead waste time on (what this relegates to) trivial issues like Iraq, Social Security, Medicare, taxes, terrorism, fiscal budget deficits, Katrina, abortion, Bird flu, the Supreme Court, education, etc..

The Bush administration made clear today that it doesn't intend to do anything about climate change in the final six months in office, announcing that instead of responding to the Supreme Court's mandate last year that the EPA determine the dangers posed to humankind by greenhouse - gas emissions they would simply request further public comment.

Hatefinder Warman and his enablers at the Commission abused the extremely narrow constitutional approval given to Section 13 by the Supreme Court in the Taylor decision and instead turned it into a personal inquisition for himself and his pals.

In 2007, the Supreme Court instructed the Bush administration to determine whether greenhouse gases should be regulated under the Clean Air Act, but last July, then - EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson announced that the agency would instead seek months of public comment on the threat posed by global - warming pollution.

Also it can include anything — video, audio — instead of simply citing a Supreme Court case, you can embed the oral arguments!»

The Supreme Court decision by Justice Goepel did not find that the arrangement was unfair or unreasonable under s. 68, but instead scrutinized whether it was fair under the ss.

Instead of using law clerks, the Supreme Court of California, (that state's highest court), uses permanent staff attorneys, some of whom are attached to particular justices; the rest are shared as a central sCourt of California, (that state's highest court), uses permanent staff attorneys, some of whom are attached to particular justices; the rest are shared as a central scourt), uses permanent staff attorneys, some of whom are attached to particular justices; the rest are shared as a central staff.

«The article suggests that the reason for this counterintuitive result may be Luttig's commitment to textualism as part of his larger judicial philosophy... This has been noted in the context of the recently completed Supreme Court term, where in several high - profile cases some of the individual Justice's votes were hard to explain in terms of political ideology, but instead seemed to reflect differences in judicial philosophy, such as principles of federalism.

If it is from the court, then why does it provide links to Supreme Court opinions posted at the Legal Information Institute instead of the opinions posted on the court's own official court, then why does it provide links to Supreme Court opinions posted at the Legal Information Institute instead of the opinions posted on the court's own official Court opinions posted at the Legal Information Institute instead of the opinions posted on the court's own official court's own official site?

For instance, in a 1968 case, a Swiss court refused to issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied with the agreement of the parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme Court enforced a first award but not a second award made with respect to the same discourt refused to issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied with the agreement of the parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme Court enforced a first award but not a second award made with respect to the same disCourt enforced a first award but not a second award made with respect to the same dispute.

Instead, the Illinois Supreme Court would sanction this circumvention of the tribunals set up to resolve internal church disputes and has ordered the Mother Church to reinstate as Bishop one who espoused views regarded by the church hierarchy to be schismatic and which the proper church tribunals have already determined merit severe sanctions.

In future class action claims against nationwide corporate defendants, it appears that the U.S. Supreme Court is generally requiring piecemeal litigation in each state where a plaintiff was injured, instead of allowing for a single consolidated class action in a single state court lawCourt is generally requiring piecemeal litigation in each state where a plaintiff was injured, instead of allowing for a single consolidated class action in a single state court lawcourt lawsuit.

In Upjohn Co. v. United States, 6 the United States Supreme Court held that a company's attorney — client privilege extends to company counsel's communications with employees in certain prescribed circumstances.7 Rather than providing a simple objective test, the Upjohn court instead established five factors to guide courts in determining whether the company's privilege should extend to counsel's communications with its employees: (1) whether the communications were made by employees at the direction of superior officers of the company for the purpose of obtaining legal advice; (2) whether the communications contained information necessary for counsel to render legal advice, which was not otherwise available from «control group» management; (3) whether the matters communicated were within the scope of the employee's corporate duties; (4) whether the employee knew that the communications were for the purpose of the company obtaining legal advice; and (5) whether the communications were ordered to be kept confidential by the employee's superiors, including that the communications were considered confidential at the time and kept confidential subsequent to the interview.8 When these elements are established, courts generally consider communications between company counsel and an employee to be within the scope of the company's attorney — client privilCourt held that a company's attorney — client privilege extends to company counsel's communications with employees in certain prescribed circumstances.7 Rather than providing a simple objective test, the Upjohn court instead established five factors to guide courts in determining whether the company's privilege should extend to counsel's communications with its employees: (1) whether the communications were made by employees at the direction of superior officers of the company for the purpose of obtaining legal advice; (2) whether the communications contained information necessary for counsel to render legal advice, which was not otherwise available from «control group» management; (3) whether the matters communicated were within the scope of the employee's corporate duties; (4) whether the employee knew that the communications were for the purpose of the company obtaining legal advice; and (5) whether the communications were ordered to be kept confidential by the employee's superiors, including that the communications were considered confidential at the time and kept confidential subsequent to the interview.8 When these elements are established, courts generally consider communications between company counsel and an employee to be within the scope of the company's attorney — client privilcourt instead established five factors to guide courts in determining whether the company's privilege should extend to counsel's communications with its employees: (1) whether the communications were made by employees at the direction of superior officers of the company for the purpose of obtaining legal advice; (2) whether the communications contained information necessary for counsel to render legal advice, which was not otherwise available from «control group» management; (3) whether the matters communicated were within the scope of the employee's corporate duties; (4) whether the employee knew that the communications were for the purpose of the company obtaining legal advice; and (5) whether the communications were ordered to be kept confidential by the employee's superiors, including that the communications were considered confidential at the time and kept confidential subsequent to the interview.8 When these elements are established, courts generally consider communications between company counsel and an employee to be within the scope of the company's attorney — client privilege.9