Sentences with phrase «supreme court on»

The Supreme Court on money laundering 5.

He wrote and sent an affidavit to the Supreme Court on the Court of Appeal decision.

He recently filed an amicus brief and appeared before the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue of whether the outside salesperson exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 applies to pharmaceutical representatives.

In September 1993, Justice Pariente was appointed to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, where she served until her appointment as the seventy - seventh Justice of the Florida Supreme Court on December 10, 1997.

An experienced and persuasive legal writer, Jenevieve has authored numerous successful briefs regarding complex intellectual property matters, including a 2016 amicus brief filed with the United States Supreme Court on behalf of the American Intellectual Property Law Association.

Mr. Fisher is no stranger to success before the Supreme Court both on the merits and for getting cases to the Court on cert.

Thomas also directed the conduct of litigation involving provider reimbursement disputes, including drafting a request for a writ of certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court on a hospital reimbursement matter.

«The Illinois Supreme Court on Forum: Was Yesterday's Gridley Decision Really All That Dramatic?

March 8 The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously upheld part of the U.S. bankruptcy law that bars attorneys from advising clients to take on more debt while considering a bankruptcy filing.

That case will be heard by the Supreme Court on February 8.

And I couldn't imagine a better way to do that than to argue cases before the Supreme Court on behalf of the United States — particularly because the Marines weren't exactly going to take me.

But one thing lacking is leadership and guidance from the Supreme Court on the overall framework, and how the various globs of the ball of wax fit together.»

The case reached the Supreme Court on the question of whether these comments gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias — a divided Court issued four separate sets of reasons.

Unfortunately, as pointed out by the Supreme Court on more than one occasion, an undefined term, when used in a legal context, can create great confusion.

Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, btw, voted to defy the Supreme Court on Chi, which was also the position of the Texas Attorney General.

«Florida Supreme Court rejects «false light» lawsuit»: The St. Petersburg Times today contains an article that begins, «In a victory for Florida newspapers and freedom of speech, the Florida Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a lawsuit that penalized a newspaper for publishing a story that was true.»

He has handled many appeals and been before the Illinois Supreme Court on five occasions.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear an appeal of a precedential Third Circuit decision holding that companies can be held liable under maritime law for asbestos - related injuries if a manufacturer could have reasonably foreseen asbestos would be later added to its product.

That issue is at the heart of the case argued before the United States Supreme Court on March 1.

In a case argued by Partner Seth Waxman on behalf of a Louisiana death - row inmate, the US Supreme Court on Monday, May 14, 2018, overturned several murder convictions and ordered a new trial after finding that the condemned man's trial attorney violated his constitutional rights.

This blog is the first covering the series of three important judgments given on Tuesday by the Supreme Court on issues arising out of the War on Terror and the United Kingdom's interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He clerked for Mr. Justice Major at the Supreme Court of Canada, and has since appeared as counsel at the Supreme Court on three significant cases, including one of the leading cases in Canada on the law of tendering.

He has argued in front of the Nevada Supreme Court on behalf of community associations and HOA collection companies.

Justice Karakatsanis for the majority expressly disagrees, writing that the Court of Appeal goes against «strong jurisprudence» from the Supreme Court on this point (at paras 27 — 31).

She also has filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court on an immigration issue that conflicted with different states.

Could anything be worse for alien tort claimants than arguing before a hostile U.S. Supreme Court on corporate liability, as the plaintiffs in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell did last month?

Supreme Court on jurisdiction, It's my good luck to saw your sites.

Examples of recent cases include the litigation in respect of the child refugees dispersed from the camp in Calais, Osborn in the Supreme Court on the requirements for Parole Board hearings, Sturnham in the Court of Appeal on damages for Article 5 breaches, the series of joined cases concerning reception conditions in Cyprus for asylum seekers, challenges to local authority taxi licensing policy, and challenges to the prison «book ban».

He has also been active in the Maritime Law Association of the United States (MLA), having served on the Board of Directors and written two amicus curiae briefs to the United States Supreme Court on the organization's behalf.

Jason Coppel QC, Tom Cross and Christopher Knight appeared in the Divisional Court and the Supreme Court on behalf of the Secretary of State.

Alternatively, your other option is to proceed to Small Claims / Supreme Court on the issue of liability.

Yes: arguing before a hostile Supreme Court on extraterritoriality, as those plaintiffs will have to do next term, thanks to a surprise procedural order on March 5.

The case might go to the Supreme Court on the Eighth Amendment question it raises.

Lawyers for Foley Hoag LLP filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 2, 2011, on behalf of the American Intellectual Property Law Association («AIPLA»), in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, et al..

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday heightened the political stakes in the new term by agreeing to decide a constitutional challenge to the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Tim Eicke QC and Edward Brown, instructed by Clarkson Wright & Jakes Limited, appeared for Amoena (UK) Limited in the Supreme Court on 7 June 2016 against HMRC.

The ruling is consistent with a previous decision of the Supreme Court on the same issue, that is, ruling n. 21614 of October 26, 2016 (which we also commented upon on this blog).

The Supreme Court on Monday gave its go - ahead for states to allow gambling on sports across the nation.

That case is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue of whether lost profits damages are recoverable for infringement occurring abroad (WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp., May 7, 2018, Chen, R.).

Judgment was given by the Supreme Court on 29 October 2009: R (on the application of L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3.

Ewan West acted for ATK Energy EU Ltd throughout the Magnox Contract litigation and appeared for ATK before the Supreme Court on the preliminary issues appeal.

We co-authored the brief filed in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of a medical device insurer in Lohr v. Medtronics, a critical case on federal preemption.

One of the most significant aspects of this decision is the Court of Appeal's finding that the unprecedented injury to dignity award was not patently unreasonable, overturning the Supreme Court on this point.

Obtained favorable ruling from North Carolina Supreme Court on behalf of safety equipment company in an electrocution case, which confirmed the defense of contributory negligence in breach of warranty matters in North Carolina.

His report and recommendation to North Yorkshire County Council in a village green case on a tricky point of prescription was upheld by the Supreme Court on judicial review: R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council [2015] AC 195.

Another provincial reference was made in 2011 to the British Columbia Supreme Court on the issue of polygamy.

Irwin Mitchell has won a landmark case in the Supreme Court on behalf of a deceased asbestos - related cancer victim, whose family will now receive compensation despite the fact that he was an employee at the factory where he worked with the toxic substance.

Does an appeal of right that is not heard or briefed remain an appeal of right if dismissed and brought in front of the Supreme Court on a jurisdictional appeal.

You can't appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court from a state supreme court on every issue, only on federal questions.

«L'affair Nadon was unprecedented and is unlikely to arise again now that we have clear guidance from the Supreme Court on what the criteria on appointment are.»