Sentences with phrase «supreme court ruling»

The state supreme court ruled in 2011 that the cuts violated state law.

She said a long - standing state supreme court ruling clearly defines «common schools» — those that can receive public funding — must be governed by an elected board.

And then I remember the recent supreme court rulings.

This week a state supreme court ruling ends the long legal battle.

It is something that will only change with another, more specific supreme court ruling.

At the core of the debate is a 2001 state supreme court ruling.

WASHINGTON (Reuters)- A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the New York attorney general's office can investigate whether national banks discriminated against minorities seeking mortgages.

WASHINGTON, April 24 - Foreign corporations can not be sued in American courts for human rights abuses committed overseas, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday, refusing to revive a lawsuit claiming Jordan - based Arab Bank Plc helped finance militant attacks in Israel and the Palestinian territories.

«U.S. Supreme Court rules against Oklahoma abortion drug law; The U.S. Supreme Court has let stand a ruling that an Oklahoma law on abortion - inducing drugs is unconstitutional»: The Oklahoman has this news update.

Two leading pro-life groups say the recent US Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) means that taxpayer dollars will continue to pay for abortions.

READ ALSO: Nduom to intensify campaign after Supreme Court ruling The letter addressed to Dr Nduom continued to state that there are other «concerns and discrepancies» found on the nomination forms of the party.

Union members may sue their employers in discrimination cases even if their labor contracts contain general language requiring such disputes to be submitted to arbitration, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week.

Provides new JPEC allowed to rewrite any existing evaluation criteria (current criteria are set by Supreme Court Rule 27).

Within hours of the Tsilhqot» in Nation decision the Tahltan First Nation announced it planned to launch an Aboriginal rights and title claim (Emma Crawford Hampel and Nelson Bennett «First Nations armed with Supreme Court ruling put mines in their sights» June 27, 2014, The First Perspective).

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today in favor of Arizona officials who had challenged lower federal court decisions that the state must provide adequate funding for its English - language learners.

Comments Off on Borrowers Sue Banks More and More: Massachusetts Supreme Court Rules for Home Owner — Foreclosing Bank Loses, Had No Standing to Foreclose on Borrower Tags: Florida Real Estate Foreclosures, Foreclosure defense attorney, foreclosure defenses, Foreclosure Fraud, Loan Modification, Mortgage foreclosure, Property foreclosure, Wrongful Foreclosure

The DTSA is arriving in the wake of several developments that have weakened the strength of patent protection, like the America Invents Act and its tougher patent review proceedings, as well as Supreme Court rulings like Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank that have made it far easier to invalidate certain types of patents.

The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Los Angeles Unified School District in a lawsuit brought by the UTLA challenging the District's 2007 approval of Green Dot Public School's Locke High School conversion.

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled in February 2003 that midwives must comply with a state law that requires an advanced degree to deliver babies.

The second is under Rule 7 - 6 (1) of the BC Supreme Court rules which allows the court to order an independent exam to «level the playing field» in an injury lawsuit.

the person, within the time that the action might have been brought or the right asserted against him or her plus the time for service permitted under Supreme Court Rule 103 (b), received such notice of the commencement of the action that the person will not be prejudiced in maintaining a defense on the merits and knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against him or her; and

In 1973, the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the failure of schools to respond to the language characteristics of LEP children was a denial of equal educational opportunity (Lau vs. Nichols, 1973).

To the extent attorney profiles list or identify certain awards or recognition by certain organizations such as Best Lawyers in America, Martindale Hubbell, Super Lawyers, Rising Stars, or others, the New Jersey Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) and, specifically, RPC 7.1, require the following disclaimer:

We believe the following Supreme Court Rule mandates confidentiality of Inquiry Commission Investigations documents until such time as the attorney has had a hearing.

The Indiana Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the state's two - year - old school voucher program allowing low - and middle - income families to use public funds to attend private schools was constitutional.

A Dane County judge overstepped her authority when she voided Gov. Scott Walker's measure limiting public sector collective bargaining, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a fractious 4 - 3 decision.

Texas Supreme Court Rules Against 600 - Plus School Districts, Laura Isensee, Houston Public Media, May 13, 2016

The Washington Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the state's charter - school law is unconstitutional.

The provincial government did not fulfill its legal obligation to consult with First Nations on the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, the B.C. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

Yet some of that resistance to data - sharing may have been dispelled in June, at least in the U.S. by the unanimous Supreme Court ruling against patenting naturally occurring genetic sequences.

The B.C. Supreme Court ruled last year that McCormick could be considered an employee of the firm as an equity partner, allowing him to go before the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal for alleged age discrimination by Faskens.

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding public use of eminent domain powers, has sparked a surge of legislative action across the country.

In 1996 the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered the state to take the remedial measures necessary to integrate schools.

The Florida Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that local governments can allow private vendors to review footage from red - light cameras as long as the decision to issue tickets remains with police.

In 1967, following the United States Supreme Court ruling requiring that all legislative districts be approximately equal in population, the voters of Erie County, in a special referendum, authorized the establishment of a 20 member County Legislature to replace the Board of Supervisors.

Nevada Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality Of ESA Program September 29, 2016 by Brett Kittredge The Nevada Supreme Court ruled today that the nation's most expansive school choice program is Constitutional.

Ohio is among a small number of states that recognize causes of action for intentional spoliation of evidence, but the actions are limited to evidence that was physically destroyed, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled today.

Established by Colorado Supreme Court Rule 254, COLAP can not release any information without a signed release.

The Kansas Supreme Court ruled earlier this month that the state's low spending on public education violated the state's constitution.

A nonbiological mother is a legal parent to the child she and her same - sex spouse conceived through assisted reproduction, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled yesterday, in a ruling that emphasized the benefits such recognition has for children.

A recent Kansas Supreme court ruling says it is.

Rule 1 (5) of the British Columbia Supreme Court Rules provides that the object of the Rules is the «just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every proceeding on its merits.»

Obtained favorable Virginia Supreme Court ruling on intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Nevertheless, the arguments are frequently crunched through, probably because of an important Illinois Supreme Court ruling from 1990 which is still good law, Rollins v. Ellwood, involving claims brought against a Baltimore police officer, among others, sounding in intentional tort for his role in the apprehension of a misidentified criminal defendant and Illinois resident in Illinois, for which the Court found the officer was not subject to Illinois jurisdiction.

A 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling did away with preclearance by striking down a key provision in the federal Voting Rights Act.