Another rep, who also asked not to be named, says she is not
sure about the meaning of suspension.
Peter S — I'm not
sure about the meaning of this sentence.
Ben — I'm not
sure about the meaning of this sentence.
Not exact matches
Having your hands free
means you can walk around, use your hands as you normally would when you speak, more easily refer to a note... and you won't have to worry
about making
sure you hold the phone in the optimal position for call clarity.
«And I'm not 100 percent
sure that we can say today — we
means President Trump and myself — that we have a common position, a common opinion
about Russia although when it comes to the conflict in Ukraine it seems that we were on the same line,» he added.
If you're familiar with the term «cloud computing» but aren't exactly
sure what it
means, take a look at Xero's cloud computing guide for a quick, simple explanation of what the cloud is all
about.
That
means that it purposefully allows in ambient noise, which is useful if you're out for a jog or bike ride and want to be extra
sure you aren't
about to be hit by a bus.
This doesn't
mean their services are bad, but you want to be
sure they are forthright
about who is doing the work, says Kerry Kerstetter, a Harrison, Ark., CPA.
The work that I do on dark matter, I'm not
sure it will have a lot of
meaning if those kids don't have an opportunity to learn
about it because society has been devastated by global warming.
The mutual economic dependency is
about the same which
means that Trump can be less
sure that his blackmail approach will work.
I guess buy
means to buy at that price, but I am not
sure about what stop refers to and what profit targets
mean, thanks
I'm not
sure what you think your book reference actually shows, but the mere fact that it is over 10 years old
means that the «current trends» it talks
about is completely out of date.
I am not
sure what you
mean with your comment
about human reason.
I am
sure it would be a powerful motivation for many if they were to realise that singing the texts of the Mass would
mean that there need be no further arguments
about which hymns should be chosen.
Also I said I am not a religious person and that
means I do not believe in any of this stuff but I am not going to say it is impossible because I think almost anything is possible so calling me a religious anything is
about as empty an insult as anyone can toss my way, read before you insult, oh yes and make
sure you retain what you read, that might help you a little.
But if they are good in themselves, and if by a «point» you
mean some truth
about the real world which one can take out of the story, I'm not
sure that I agree.
I'm not quite
sure what you
meant about «silly adventure stories without any point.»
But I'm not
sure about just ditching the idea of a vision that the Body has (I'm talking local church)... I
mean, although I want sometimes to ditch it, I can't find justification in Scripture.
If it's false, then the statement serves as the
means to make
sure people do not try to find the truth
about existence.
I am not fully
sure what it
means for Christ to become sin for us either, and I would be a little nervous
about any scholar that was
sure.
I am not
sure what you
mean about working both ways, but a lifestyle of deceit, lying, stealing, covering up is a curse in itself, and is passed on to the 3rd, and 4th generations in a family tree.
But I found myself riled when people assumed that this specialism
meant that I could not preach, made
sure that I would be a poor administrator, assumed me to be unconcerned
about getting the gospel to people, found me a psychologist instead of a theologian, and took it for granted that I could never take a hard - nosed line because I supported people.
but on the third day using his Power of Resurrection rose from the dead to claim his seat next to God in heaven, I
mean next to himself since he was also God and then told the masses that he died for their sins, though oddly enough being God he could have simply absolved them of their sins and he really didn't die because he lives and is coming back to judge man based upon the original sins... but not
sure if that would work since man can clearly kill a God with wood and nails... I know, I know confusing and likely to be labeled heresy... but debates
about nomenclature and religion... i
mean story telling... just don't mix.
On the other hand, if they think prayer is a dialogue with God, they're often not
sure what it
means to have God respond - and they are uneasy with people who speak confidently
about what God has revealed to them.
Many of those less friendly to the market than the Pope seem to be under the impression that when he talks
about a framework circumscribing the market, he
means some kind of mixed system halfway between the efficiency of the market and the «ideal» of socialism — that elusive «third way» that former Czech President Vaclav Klaus has said is the
surest path to the Third World.
No, because the end justify s the
means and you have already made up your mind that you are right
about Jesus and there can be no other truth, and it's never
about learning more
about different people and cultures and religions, it's
about making
sure anyone who is different knows you are a Christian which is the only sensible way to live and anyone who is not like you is either converted, attacked, pitied or dismissed as a fool who awaits eternal damnation.
Sure, lots of people get killed, and there is a lot of hate, but those people sure are passionate about their cause and have really given meaning to their lives (short though they may
Sure, lots of people get killed, and there is a lot of hate, but those people
sure are passionate about their cause and have really given meaning to their lives (short though they may
sure are passionate
about their cause and have really given
meaning to their lives (short though they may be).
And at the end of the day you shouldn't worry
about this anyway because your election is «
sure»,
meaning you don't have any control over it either way.
Oh
sure, they may talk a lot
about the Bible, and may even memorize large portions of it, but attempting actually learning what those passages
mean is frowned upon.
@ jay — the next time i see a homeless old person i'll make
sure to give up my one dollar that i was going to spend on soda because if the christians don't care
about them then we are pretty much doomed, i
mean the homeless old people because nobody else out there cares.
As for number 10, if you truly
mean what you say
about the weak arguments of theists, then you recognize the weakness of Dawkins» statement (actually, I'm pretty
sure it didn't originate with him).
But it seems that we have often gone one step further: we justify our own confusion by being suspicious of any certainty, and we interpret the lack of easy answers to
mean that any answer is as good as another, that we can not be
sure about right and wrong.
I'm not
sure what toilets you are talking
about, unless you
mean a washing area for cleansing before prayers, but a truly «segregated» toilet would most likely be illegal in the US.
Now I think
about it, I'm not
sure if that
means «Soaking - IN God's presence», like absorbing (should really be soaking up) or «Soaking, in God's presence».
I'm not
sure what you
mean about all making our own rules that we live by.
Not that I would be fully aware of the reasoning thereof, but pretty
sure it isn't blackmail (both in the
meanings of blackmailed into it, and blackmailing anyone), and that it isn't
about wanting after - life reward.
What I learned
about the theory of the virtues from all this I'm not
sure, but I did learn something of what it
means to inhabit a system of thought long enough to see the world in its terms.
But I'm pretty
sure that preserving the sacredness of sexuality
means speaking
about it with reverence, respect, and truth (and with some humor now and then too, as I'm convinced that our ability to laugh at ourselves has a direct correlation to our ability to spot the idols in our lives).
Or are you talking
about sex roles in the bedroom, in which case I'm not too
sure what you
mean.
We also need to understand what people
mean when they use words so we can be
sure we are all talking
about the same thing.
I'm not too
sure what you
mean about the writing of tahini.
I'm planning on opening up the pomegranate and taking out the seeds and just adding everything together, but I wish there was more direction
about what to do... not
sure if the recipe was
meant to end this way, but it is a bit disconcerting... i am hoping these are technical problems, I have really loved seeing your posts, but after diving in to make your recipe I am feeling quite adrift...
Also, I'm
sure that in some way you read my thoughts
about desiring the perfect baked french toast recipe (I
mean that in the least creepy - stalker way possible).
I
mean, the original recipe called for pistachios and I'm
sure they'd be awesome but there's something
about the way that almonds and cherries play off each other that is perfect; they were always
meant to be together.
Whip the egg whites in a mixer (heidi note: I'm still not
sure if they
meant whip or whisk... the recipe doesn't say anything
about whipping into peaks, and it doesn't say anything later
about carefully folding in the whites, so this time I went on the assumption that they really
meant for us to whisk the whites a bit - folding in whites might be interesting too though, and might lighten up the waffles a bit.)
I'm pretty
sure I had no idea what the word stress
meant and that wasn't an actual reality for me until
about 9th grade.
I'm not
sure about what you
mean.
Hi Holly, I'm not
sure what you
mean about the avo, per the recipe it's added to the cauliflower mixture then blended, not just mashed and stirred in.
Wasn't
sure about the shredded carrot amount because I didn't know if it
meant loosely - packed or compressed, so I compressed the carrots a bit, but not so hard that they were difficult to pop out of the measuring cup.
There's literally no reason not to buy free range even though, now that we think
about it, we're not actually
sure what that
means.