Not exact matches
The CO2 is sampled from air that is above the Boundary Layer; ostensibly free from
surface effects.The Keeling Curve has the longest history of CO2 continuous
measurements; but over the past 50 years a network of similar
stations has become active.
The new analysis combines sea -
surface temperature records with meteorological
station measurements and tests alternative choices for ocean records, urban warming and tropical and Arctic oscillations.
NASA's analyses incorporate
surface temperature
measurements from 6,300 weather
stations, ship - and buoy - based observations of sea
surface temperatures, and temperature
measurements from Antarctic research
stations.
The field
measurements were carried out at the
station of the University of Helsinki in Hyytiäla in southern Finland, which is typical for boreal forests, which cover eight percent of the earth's
surface.
Surface temperature
measurements are collected from about 30,000
stations around the world (Rennie et al. 2014).
Again, Monckton must surely know full well that for the last 25 - 30 years satellite temperature
measurement of sea and land
surface have replaced terrestrial temperature
station measurements in many cases since these give a much greater coverage (70 % of the
surface of the Earth is water... it's difficult to put weather
stations on top of ice sheets etc.!)
These data are from the ARM Eddy Correlation Flux
Measurement system, the Energy Balance Bowen Ratio
station, the Soil Water and Temperature System, the
Surface Meteorological Observation Systems, and the Oklahoma Mesonet.
Yes, there are certainly temperature
stations that could be better designed, and yes, the observed
surface temperature record might change slightly if all temperature
stations were making precisely accurate
measurements.
Kenttärova and Lompolojänkkä are part of the same 42 - ha catchment, and the
surface water move nutrients within the catchment from Kenttärova to Lompolojänkkä and finally into the Lake Pallasjärvi (close to the flux
measurement station Pallaslompolonniemi).
The size of the temperature increase was calculated from thousands of
measurements from more than 6,000 weather
stations, ship - and buoy - based observations of sea
surface temperatures, and
measurements across Antarctic research
stations.
(1) In addition to the data of the near -
surface temperatures, which are composed of
measurements from weather
stations and sea
surface temperatures, there is also the microwave data from satellites, which can be used to estimate air temperatures in the troposphere in a few kilometers altitude.
There is good evidence that the answer to both these question is no: (The insensitivy of the results to methodology of selecting rural
stations, the Parker et al windy days study, and the fact that data from satellite skin
surface measurements, from sea
surface temperatures, deep ocean temps as we as tropospheric temps are all in good agreement).
How to avoid problems with most land - based temperature weather
stations: Use lighthouses as thermometers for accurate and unbiased
measurement of
surface air temperature.
In fact,
surface station measurements show a significant warming, while MSU
measurements do not.
Note that the entire 0.6 degC warming comes from
surface station measurements, not from satellite or radiosonde
measurements.
To conduct its analysis, GISS uses publicly available data from 6,300 meteorological
stations around the world; ship - and buoy - based observations of sea
surface temperature; and Antarctic research
station measurements.
Most interesting is that the about monthly variations correlate with the lunar phases (peak on full moon) The Helsinki Background
measurements 1935 The first background
measurements in history; sampling data in vertical profile every 50 - 100m up to 1,5 km; 364 ppm underthe clouds and above Haldane
measurements at the Scottish coast 370 ppmCO2 in winds from the sea; 355 ppm in air from the land Wattenberg
measurements in the southern Atlantic ocean 1925-1927 310 sampling
stations along the latitudes of the southern Atlantic oceans and parts of the northern; measuring all oceanographic data and CO2 in air over the sea; high ocean outgassing crossing the warm water currents north (> ~ 360 ppm) Buchs
measurements in the northern Atlantic ocean 1932 - 1936 sampling CO2 over sea
surface in northern Atlantic Ocean up to the polar circle (Greenland, Iceland, Spitsbergen, Barents Sea); measuring also high CO2 near Spitsbergen (Spitsbergen current, North Cape current) 364 ppm and CO2 over sea crossing the Atlantic from Kopenhagen to Newyork and back (Brements on a swedish island Lundegards CO2 sampling on swedish island (Kattegatt) in summer from 1920 - 1926; rising CO2 concentration (+7 ppm) in the 20s; ~ 328 ppm yearly average
To conduct its analysis, GISS uses publicly available data from three sources: weather data from more than a thousand meteorological
stations around the world; satellite observations of sea
surface temperature; and Antarctic research
station measurements.
Upgrade the
station and do day / night 360 degree infrared
measurements, grid surrounding
surfaces with actual
surface temperature
measurements in multiple samples per year etc... That might be worth 100K per
station.
The data presented here has been constructed from thousands of
surface station measurements from around the world, and tends to be a couple hours behind real - time.
The GISS team measured temperatures using records from land - based weather
stations, and ship and satellite
measurements of sea -
surface temperature.
These are created by combining ship - and buoy - based
measurements of ocean sea
surface temperatures with temperature readings of the
surface air temperature from weather
stations on land.
The temperature analysis produced at GISS is compiled from weather data from more than 1,000 meteorological
stations around the world, satellite observations of sea -
surface temperature, and Antarctic research
station measurements.
There are serious problems with all the current
measurements from
surface stations to satellites, but a major one is the contamination of the
surface readings by changes in the physical conditions around the weather
station.
These include the primary
surface temperature thermometer records (NASA GISS, NOAA, and HadCRUT); satellite
measurements of the lower troposphere temperature processed by Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and the University of Alabama - Huntsville (UAH); and 5 major reanalysis datasets which incorporate
station data, aircraft data, satellite data, radiosonde data, buoy and ship
measurements, and meteorological weather modeling.
«Since 1990,
surface ocean pH has directly been measured or calculated at several locations, with the average recent decrease estimated as 0.0019 pH units per year at the Hawaii Ocean Time - series (HOT; close to the site of long - term atmospheric CO2
measurements at Mauna Loa)[12]; 0.0017 per year based on transects in the North Pacific [13]; 0.0012 per year at the Bermuda Atlantic Time - Series (BATS)[14] and 0.0017 per year at the European
Station for Time - Series in the Ocean at the Canary Islands (ESTOC)[15].
Because the GISS analysis combines available sea
surface temperature records with meteorological
station measurements, we test alternative choices for the ocean data, showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where observations are limited.
Over land, NCDC
surface -
station measurements yield 0.309 degrees per decade for the same time period, while GISS land
stations yield 0.188 degrees per decade.
Impact: Replacing old ozone analyzers at existing
stations and adding new sites on the west and east coast of the U.S. would increase the reliability and scope of
surface ozone
measurements (which may be impacted by industrial activity in Asia).
The temperature analysis produced at GISS is compiled from weather data from more than 1,000 meteorological
stations around the world, satellite observations of sea
surface temperature and Antarctic research
station measurements.
I know that around the US there are coastal moorings and
stations in river mouths and harbours which report water
surface temperatures that aren't comparable to nearby open ocean temperature
measurements used in SST datasets.
The temperature
measurements collected by the Bureau are from thermometers — most recently electronic sensors as part of automatic weather
stations within Stevenson screens — and are what are referred to as
surface temperature
measurements.
Roy Spencer developed his own
surface temperature index for the USA 48, by using only the
stations which have a homogenous method of taking data over time (four
measurements per day) and which are hence completely free of any TOBS biases.
The answer is there are serious problems with all the current
measurements from
surface stations to satellites, but a major one is the contamination of the
surface readings by changes in the physical conditions around the weather
station.
These
surface networks have had so many changes over time that the number of
stations that have been moved, had their time of observation changed, had equipment changes, maintenance issues, or have been encroached upon by micro site biases and / or UHI using the raw data for all
stations on a national scale or even a global scale gives you a result that is no longer representative of the actual
measurements, there is simply too much polluted data.
While the Leroy (1999) system performs well for new
station siting evaluation, it does not take into account the
surface area of heat sinks and sources that may encroach upon a temperature
measurement station over its lifetime.
Similar to the Leroy (1999) system, it adds total
surface area (of heat sources and heat sinks) to the distance
measurement as an additional metric for determining
station site rating.
As I understand it, satellite
measurements are of the lower troposphere and
station measurements are
surface temperatures, at least the air temperature at a metre and a bit above the
surface.
NASA and Hadley rely on an overlapping set of
surface and ocean temperature
measurement stations and span the period from 1880 to present.
And you AGW - «Skeptics» are the ones who want that the
surface temperature analyses which use
measurements from meteorological
stations were all wrong, because of artefacts in the measured temperature raw data or because of artificially warming trends allegedly introduced by quality control and / or homogenizaton procedures.
I find that I keep being surprised by the nonsense that is published, and is supposedly derived from
surface station measurements by «scientists».
Since then, a growing number of
surface temperature
measurement stations worldwide, coupled with improved methods for correcting for biases induced through urban heat island effects and other
station siting and operational issues, have allowed for the development of accurate global temperature estimates.
Both mostly use the same network of
surface stations, but they differ in how they extrapolate temperature changes in areas with few
measurement stations.
In contrast to
surface data, these satellite data cover the whole Earth, are fully disclosed, and are not contaminated by poor maintenance and location of weather
stations, changes from mercury to electronic
measurement, and unexplained adjustments.
Urban sprawl has swallowed up many
surface temperature monitoring
stations causing increased temperature
measurements.
The temperature analysis conducted by NASA draws data from more than 1,000 meteorological
stations worldwide, satellite observations of temperatures at the
surface of the oceans, and
measurements taken by Antarctic research
stations.
Using
surface measurements of maximum and minimum temperatures from the Global Daily Climatological Network data set, we find evidence of a weekly cycle in diurnal temperature range (DTR) for many
stations in the United States, Mexico, Japan, and China.
The problem in the Antarctica is that the satellite and AWS temperature
measurements only go back to the early 1980s, as I recall, and prior to that only sparse temperature data was available from
surface stations.
Besides the fact
surface station measurements (not the models of
surface temps made from the
measurements) don't show any warming of Tmax.
Global average temperature The mean
surface temperature of the Earth measured from three main sources: satellites, monthly readings from a network of over 3,000
surface temperature observation
stations and sea
surface temperature
measurements taken mainly from the fleet of merchant ships, naval ships and data buoys.