Not exact matches
Re 346 ziarra — the flow of heat (between adjacent layers of material
via conduction, convection, or mass diffusion, or potentially across larger distances
via emission and absorption of photons) will be from hot to cold (or from higher to lower concentrations of a substance carrying heat, which might end up being from cold to hot in some conditions, such as a wet
surface cooling by
evaporation into warm dry air).
1) Can the IR radiated by CO2 to the
surface of the ocean that is captured as latent heat and transferred to the TOA
via evaporation, be released at different wavelengths??
On a water planet, most heat transferred from the
surface is removed
via evaporation, the heated air rising
via convection.
How much of the energy within the atmosphere is other then radiative, conducted from the
surface to convection currents, and or latent heat moved
via evaporation?
At the
surface, increased pressure from injecting water vapour into a parcel of air
via evaporation causes the parcel to rise so that
surface pressure below it falls.
The oceans control the background rate of energy flow from ocean to air
via The Hot Water Bottle Effect and it is the energy flow from ocean to air (supplemented to a miniscule extent by the greenhouse effect) that drives the rate of
evaporation by creating varying temperature differentials between sea
surface and air at the
surface.
(For the earth system as a whole, the only way it can lose heat is
via radiation, although heat can be transferred between different parts of the system, e.g.,
surface to atmosphere by convection and
evaporation / condensation.)
The
surface has a loss of energy
via convection and
evaporation as well.
The short and lazy answer to Matthew Marler's question about the column energetics that bring the system back to equilibrium is that GCMs do of course represent
evaporation, sensible heating, etc in ways that are undoubtedly imperfect (e.g.,
via «bulk formulas» that transfer energy down - gradient of temperature or humidity differences between the
surface and air aloft), but they are free to evolve in climate change scenarios in ways that are physically self - consistent.