Sentences with phrase «surveillance abuses by»

President Trump is reportedly expected to approve the release of a controversial memo, which alleges surveillance abuses by the FBI.

On Friday, the House Intelligence Committee, which is chaired by Republican Representative Devin Nunes, released a four - page memo alleging surveillance abuses by the FBI.

Trump did so again last month after the House Intelligence Committee released a controversial Republican memo purporting to show surveillance abuses by the FBI and the Department of Justice in seeking to monitor an adviser to the Trump campaign.

Not exact matches

The document alleges abuses of power by the FBI during its investigation into the Trump campaign's ties with Russia; it focuses almost entirely on FBI surveillance of the president's former adviser Carter Page and is thin on evidence of actual wrongdoing by the FBI.

The memo Duncan is referring to is a four - page memo written by Republican Rep. Devin Nunes (R - CA), which allegedly details abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that the FBI used to wiretap Carter Page, a foreign policy adviser for President Trump's presidential campaign.

The memo begins by making a grandiose claim: The FBI's use of surveillance power under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 campaign was «a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA prosurveillance power under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 campaign was «a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA proSurveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 campaign was «a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.»

There is no proof in the memo that the FBI is biased against Trump, no proof of abuse of surveillance powers by the FBI, and no proof that the investigation into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia is fundamentally flawed.

The House passed a renewal of a key foreign surveillance program, even though Trump sent mixed signals by complaining it was used to «badly surveil and abuse» his campaign and then reverting to his support for it.

Republicans on Capitol Hill welcomed the decision but acknowledged that it fell short of demands by three Republican committee chairmen that the Justice Department appoint a second special counsel to investigate the accusations of surveillance abuses.

President Trump cleared the way for the release of a secret memo written by Republican congressional staffers and said to accuse federal law enforcement officials of abusing their surveillance authorities.

He discovered the abuse of surveillance over everyday citizens rubberstamped by a FISA court meant to provide oversight.

With a Sarah Palin-esque President giving the military carte blanche to operate inside America using any means necessary to deal with «illegals» blamed for the zombie outbreaks, Dead Rising 3 scores point after point by attacking the concept of a surveillance state, pro-fascist propaganda, and especially the US's colonial abuses in Central America.

However, the abuse of the power of this type of technology is completely left out of the equation, and only by digging deeply enough into the brilliantly compiled linear notes on the exhibition's website detailing the history of surveillance from 1274 BC to 2016, written by Berit Gwendolyn Gilma and Hanno Hauenstei, can one even begin to realise the implications.

At the end of the day, once the principle of massive surveillance schemes based on data mining mechanisms is considered to be acceptable as such, the standard of the «reasonable suspicion» is overrun and has to be replaced by principles and other guarantees preventing any abuse, provided that this is possible.

By bringing together human rights defenders and journalists from four different continents, it serves to highlight the dangers mass surveillance pose to the vital work of countless organisations and to individuals who expose human rights abuses and defend those at risk.»

The NPRM would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information without individual authorization to: (1) A public health authority authorized by law to collect or receive such information for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability, including, but not limited to, the reporting of disease, injury, vital events such as birth or death, and the conduct of public health surveillance, public health investigations, and public health interventions; (2) a public health authority or other appropriate authority authorized by law to receive reports of child abuse or neglect; (3) a person or entity other than a governmental authority that could demonstrate or demonstrated that it was acting to comply with requirements or direction of a public health authority; or (4) a person who may have been exposed to a communicable disease or may otherwise be at risk of contracting or spreading a disease or condition and was authorized by law to be notified as necessary in the conduct of a public health intervention or investigation.

The absence of association with agency contact may reflect that the Early Start series was under regular surveillance by family support workers and thus would be expected to have greater agency contact for abuse and neglect concerns.