Sentences with phrase «survey of the scientific study»

He concludes from his survey of the scientific study of man that subjective understanding plays an increasing role there.

Not exact matches

Cleveland draws from all sorts of sources — from Scot McKnight's A Community Called Atonement, to college football, to multiple scientific studies and surveys, many of which are quite colorful and fascinating.

«More so than for any other religious tradition, a person can become UU because of what he already believes rather than believing what he does because of becoming a UU,» said James Casebolt, coauthor of two papers on the regional survey read at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion annual meeting in October.

Andrew M. Greeley, «Religious Imagery as a Predictor Variable in the General Social Survey,» paper presented at a plenary session of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Chicago, 1984.

The study, published in Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the scientific journal of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) surveyed 1,000 pregnant women and 1,000 new moms.

The study, published in Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the scientific journal of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) surveyed 1,000 pregnant women and 1,000 new moms.

Although nearly three - quarters of women taking a recent survey had one or more risk factors for heart disease, a startlingly small proportion — just 16 percent — had actually been told by their doctors that these factors put them at risk for heart disease, according to a study scheduled for presentation at the American College of Cardiology's 65th Annual Scientific Session.

The findings come from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal - 3), the largest scientific study of sexual health and lifestyles in Britain.

We believe that the oceanographic studies will proceed as planned and do not anticipate an impact on the Nunavik Inuit Health Survey, says Dr. Louis Fortier, Scientific Director of the Amundsen and ArcticNet Science programs.

In addition, numerous studies that have surveyed the state of scientific agreement on the issue report that more than 97 percent of independent climate scientists agree that human - caused climate change is a reality.

Saturn's moon Enceladus also has a substantial reservoir of liquid water, but the U.S. scientific community, in its most recent decadal survey, prioritized studying Europa, which is nearer.

Worm and his 18 co-authors used data from catch reports, scientific surveys, stock assessments, modeling and other sources to try to get a clearer picture of the fisheries statuses than previous studies had achieved.

Soon is a leading skeptic of the widely accepted science surrounding climate change, In the International Journal of Public Opinion Research, a study titled «The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change» found that 97 percent of scientists surveyed believed global warming already is ongoing, with 84 percent of scientists surveyed believing human - produced greenhouse gases were the driving force behind the change.

The results of these studies, which are expected to be made public by the end of the year, can be seen as preparatory work, soliciting ideas from the scientific community for the next Planetary Science Decadal Survey that is due to come out in a few years.

It undertakes practical conservation projects, surveys and scientific studies, conducts annual monitoring of seabird populations, rescues wildlife in trouble, publishes guides and information on many aspects of the Falkland Islands environment, and involves islanders of all ages in its activities, including running a WATCH group for children.

For «Judging Cheaters,» a 2012 study published in the scientific journal Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Dodge and her colleagues surveyed about 1,200 men in their first year at a large university.

This study provides the first systematic review and meta - analysis of survey data on scientific misconduct.

This isn't news to top climate scientists around the world (see Hadley Center: «Catastrophic» 5 — 7 °C warming by 2100 on current emissions path) or even to top climate scientists in this country (see US Geological Survey stunner: Sea - level rise in 2100 will likely «substantially exceed» IPCC projections, SW faces «permanent drying») and certainly not to people who follow the scientific literature, like Climate Progress readers (see Study: Water - vapor feedback is «strong and positive,» so we face «warming of several degrees Celsius»).

Cassie strongly believes in the curative power of good relationships because she has seen it work in her own life — she also cites reputable scientific studies, like this Harvard survey, to support her position.

Much of this research has now been renounced and updated by Dr. David Mech, the expert and senior scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey who was largely responsible for the original scientific study.

two points for your consideration, are (A) the design of the Cook - 2013 study included a second part where the scientific paper authors were surveyed to discover their assessments of their own papers, regarding attribution... and this second part confirmed the accuracy of the first part

Phil, finding two errors in José's examples doesn't exactly an «epic fail», since the main point «The Cook et al 97 % paper included a bunch of psychology studies, marketing papers, and surveys of the general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change» remains valid.

The main point «The Cook et al 97 % paper included a bunch of psychology studies, marketing papers, and surveys of the general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change» remains valid.

The thrust of the argument is that the inclusion of «a bunch of psychology studies, marketing papers, and surveys of the general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change.»

Please study «confabulation «and how the scientific community avoids it via objectively verifiable surveys of the scientific literature, Rud Istvan!

The three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — reveal how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimaScientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climascientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Remember these people didn't just make this stuff up, it is a survey of the scientific literature, with references to hundreds of studies.

Hannam wrote «That is the finding of a University of Queensland - led study that surveyed the abstracts of almost 12,000 scientific papers from 1991 - 2011 and claims to be the largest peer - reviewed study of its kind.

97 % of the climate scientists surveyed believe «global average temps have increased» during the past century 84 % say they «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied the matter — IE: are NOT experts on the topic] human - induced warming is occurring, & 74 % agree that «currently available scientific evidence» substantiates its occurrence.

RE: The Over-whelming scientific Consensus on man - made CO2 caused Global - warming - 97 % of the climate scientists surveyed believe «global aver temps have increased» during the past century [So do I]-- Your quotes: How «significant it is that 84 % of climate scientists have reached a «consensus» that «human - induced warming is occurring» «--RCB- 84 % «personally believe» [implies they may NOT have actually studied this topic — IE: may NOT be experts on this particular matter] human - induced warming is occurring -LCB--... — «In 1991 only 41 % of climate scientists were very confident that industrial emissions of greenhouse gases were responsible for climate disruption.

First: «The Cook et al. (2013) 97 % paper included a bunch of psychology studies, marketing papers, and surveys of the general public as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change.»

Did Cook et al. (2013) include psychology studies, marketing papers, and surveys of the general public, as scientific endorsement of anthropogenic climate change?

A number of surveys and analyses independently found around 90 % to 100 % scientific agreement on human - caused global warming, with multiple studies converging on 97 % consensus.

We also examined the results of an NCHS simulation study using national survey data [22] to see if some scientific support could be found for a compromise.

The UMTRI / Toyota Teen Driver Distraction Study, the largest scientific survey of its kind, also found that texting while driving remains commonplace among teens, despite ongoing, nationwide efforts to educate drivers on the significant risks associated with these behaviors.

Collaboration Initial data analyses and publications on Middle Childhood Survey and linked data were generated primarily by the authors of this paper and other members of the Scientific Committee, named in the Acknowledgements section, who oversaw the New South Wales Child Development Study (NSW - CDS).

Based on surveys of nearly all the students available at a single high school, the U. study is the first to tackle the phenomenon with scientific rigor and to quantify teens» attitudes about sexting.